Empowering Innovation: The Role of Digital Leadership in Shaping Gen Z and Gen Y Performance with Creativity as a Moderator
Downloads
Objective: This study develops a quantitative model that integrates digital leadership, innovative work behavior, and employee performance, while also examining the moderating effect of creativity from the perspective of Upper Echelons Theory.
Design/Methods/Approach: This study employs PLS-SEM to examine the relationships among variables, using data collected from full-time Gen Z and Gen Y employees across various industries.
Findings: The study shows that digital leadership positively and significantly influences innovative work behavior, which also exerts a positive and significant effect on employee performance. In addition, digital leadership directly enhances employee performance. The results further indicate that innovative work behavior partially mediates the effect of digital leadership on employee performance. Finally, the moderating analysis suggests that high levels of employee creativity weaken the relationship between digital leadership and employee performance.
Originality/Value: This study contributes to existing literature on the field of leadership in the perspective of Upper Echelons Theory, especially that focus on the field of digital leadership.
Practical/Policy implication: Theoretical aspects of the study advance our understanding of digital leadership and its mechanisms. For practice, the results provide actionable guidance for top management, particularly in organizations that employ Gen Z and Gen Y workers.
Aabo, T., & Rønnow, S. K. (2024). Female CEOs with a squeeze of narcissism: A perfect cocktail for corporate performance? Finance Research Letters, 64, 105469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105469
Agnihotri, A., & Bhattacharya, S. (2025). Generalist versus specialist CEO and R&D commitment: evidence from an emerging market. Journal of Management & Organization, 31(4), 1837–1853. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2021.7
Al Wali, J., Muthuveloo, R., Teoh, A. P., & Al Wali, W. (2023). Disentangling the relationship between employees’ dynamic capabilities, innovative work behavior and job performance in public hospitals. International Journal of Innovation Science, 15(2), 368–384. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJIS-01-2022-0012
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 123–167.
Amabile, T. M., & Kramer, S. J. (2007). Inner work life. Harvard Business Review, 85(5), 72–83.
Ayoobzadeh, M., Schweitzer, L., Lyons, S., & Ng, E. (2024). A tale of two generations: A time-lag study of career expectations. Personnel Review, 53(7), 1649–1665. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2022-0101
Baer, M., & Oldham, G. R. (2006). The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 963–970. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.963
Bălan, S., & Vreja, L. O. (2018, November). Gen Z: Challenges for management and leadership. In Proceedings of the 12th International Management Conference: Management Perspectives in the Digital Era (pp. 1–2). Bucharest, Romania.
Benitez, J., Arenas, A., Castillo, A., & Esteves, J. (2022). Impact of digital leadership capability on innovation performance: The role of platform digitization capability. Information & Management, 59(2), 103590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2022.103590
Büyükbeşe, T., Dikbaş, T., Klein, M., & Ünlü, S. B. (2022). A study on digital leadership scale (DLS) development. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 19(2), 740–760. https://doi.org/10.33437/ksusbd.1135540
Chin, W. W., Gopal, A., & Salisbury, W. D. (1997). Advancing the theory of adaptive structuration: The development of a scale to measure faithfulness of appropriation. Information Systems Research, 8(4), 342–367. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.8.4.342
Colquitt, J. A., Lepine, J. A., & Wesson, M. J. (2018). Organizational behavior: Improving performance and commitment in the workplace (6th ed.). McGraw Hill Education.
Databoks. (2021, May 24). Proporsi populasi Generasi Z dan Milenial terbesar di Indonesia. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2021/05/24/proporsi-populasi-generasi-z-dan-milenial-terbesar-di-indonesia
De Jong, J. P., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2008). Innovative work behavior: Measurement and validation. EIM Business and Policy Research, 8(1), 1–27.
De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x
Deloitte. (2019). Millennials in Industry 4.0: A gift or a threat to Indonesian human resources? https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/id/Documents/about-deloitte/id-about-dip-edition-1-chapter-2-en-sep2019.pdf
Erhan, T., Uzunbacak, H. H., & Aydin, E. (2022). From conventional to digital leadership: Exploring digitalization of leadership and innovative work behavior. Management Research Review, 45(11), 1524–1543. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-05-2021-0338
Evdokimov, E., Hanlon, D., & Lim, E. K. (2022). Do generalist CEOs magnify boardroom backscratching? Journal of Business Ethics, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04895-0
Fadhilah, I., & Aruan, D. T. H. (2023). Understanding consumer adoption and actual usage of digital payment instruments: Comparison between Gen Y and Gen Z. International Journal of Electronic Marketing and Retailing, 14(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEMR.2023.127272
Fiernaningsih, N., Herijanto, P., & Trivena, S. M. (2022). How to improve employee performance based on transglobal leadership? Problems and Perspectives in Management, 20(3), 400–410. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(3).2022.32
Figueiredo, P., & Rodrigues, R. (2024). Digital leadership and virtual performance. In New research on leadership styles and performance (pp. 187–202). Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
Frye, M. B., & Pham, D. T. (2018). CEO gender and corporate board structures. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 69, 110–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2017.12.002
Fulcrum. (2022, March 3). The state of Indonesia’s digital economy in 2022. https://fulcrum.sg/the-state-of-indonesias-digital-economy-in-2022
Gandasari, D., Tjahjana, D., Dwidienawati, D., & Ichsan, M. (2024). How to attract talents? The role of CSR, employer brand, benefits and career development. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2323774. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2323774
García-Meca, E. (2016). The impact of corporate governance on firm performance: Evidence from Spain. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 16(4), 615–627.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24345254
Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4277628
Harymawan, I., Nasih, M., Putra, F. K. G., Taylor, G., & Amran, A. (2025). Military experience and sustainable development goal disclosure. Research in International Business and Finance, 103022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2025.103022
Indriani, Y., Wahyuningsih, S. H., & Qamari, I. N. (2024). The role of innovative work behavior as an intervening variable in the relationship between transformational leadership and information sharing on employee performance. Asian Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting, 24(5), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajeba/2024/v24i51309
Iqbal, N., Anwar, S., & Haider, N. (2015). Effect of leadership style on employee performance. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review, 5(146), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.4172/2223-5833.1000146
Jameson, J., Rumyantseva, N., Cai, M., Markowski, M., Essex, R., & McNay, I. (2022). A systematic review, textual narrative synthesis and framework for digital leadership research maturity in higher education. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100115
Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort–reward fairness and innovative work behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287–302. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317900167038
Jong, J. P. J. (2007). Individual innovation: The connection between leadership and employees' innovative work behavior. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: EIM.
Kabir, M., & Rashid, H. (2024). Do generalist CEOs engage in more tax avoidance than specialist CEOs? Accounting and Business Research, 54(5), 525–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2023.2183486
Karakose, T., & Tülübaş, T. (2023). Digital leadership and sustainable school improvement—A conceptual analysis and implications for future research. Educational Process: International Journal, 12(1), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2023.121.1
Klein, M. (2020). Leadership characteristics in the era of digital transformation. Business and Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(2), 883–902. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i1.1441
Kmieciak, R. (2021). Trust, knowledge sharing, and innovative work behavior: Empirical evidence from Poland. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(5), 1832–1859. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2020-0134
Krystyniak, K., & Staneva, V. (2024). Executive gender and capital structure: New evidence from rebalancing events. Finance Research Letters, 65, 105520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.105520
Licata, J. W., Mowen, J. C., Harris, E. G., & Brown, T. J. (2003). On the trait antecedents and outcomes of service worker job resourcefulness: A hierarchical model approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(3), 256–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070303031003004
Lim, H. S., & Gilson, L. L. (2013). The curvilinear effect of creativity on performance: A moderating effect of team creativity. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2013(1), 13245. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2013.13245abstract
Link, A. N., & Siegel, D. S. (2007). Innovation, entrepreneurship, and technological change. Oxford University Press.
Madjar, N., Oldham, G. R., & Pratt, M. G. (2002). There’s no place like home? The contributions of work and nonwork creativity support to employees’ creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 757–767. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069309
Memon, A. H., & Rahman, I. A. (2013). Analysis of cost overrun factors for small scale construction projects in Malaysia using PLS-SEM method. Modern Applied Science, 7(8), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.5539/mas.v7n8p78
Minichilli, A., Corbetta, G., & MacMillan, I. C. (2010). Top management teams in family-controlled companies: ‘Familiness’, ‘faultlines’, and their impact on financial performance. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00888.x
Nielsen, S. (2010). Top management team diversity: A review of theories and methodologies. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(3), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00263.x
Oberer, B., & Erkollar, A. (2018). Leadership 4.0: Digital leaders in the age of Industry 4.0. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 7(4), 404–412. https://doi.org/10.33844/ijol.2018.60332
Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607–634. https://doi.org/10.2307/256657
Öngel, V., Günsel, A., Gençer Çelik, G., Altındağ, E., & Tatlı, H. S. (2023). Digital leadership’s influence on individual creativity and employee performance: A view through the generational lens. Behavioral Sciences, 14(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14010003
Patel, P. C., & Cooper, D. (2014). Structural power equality between family and non-family TMT members and the performance of family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1624–1649. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0681
Perry-Smith, J. E., & Mannucci, P. V. (2017). From creativity to innovation: The social network drivers of the four phases of the idea journey. Academy of Management Review, 42(1), 53–79. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0462
Putri, N., & Meria, L. (2022). The effect of transformational leadership on employee performance through job satisfaction and organizational commitment. IAIC Transactions on Sustainable Digital Innovation (ITSDI), 4(1), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.34306/itsdi.v4i1.565
Robert Half. (2023). Examining the multigenerational workforce. https://content.roberthalfonline.com/US/files/multigenworkforce-ebook-0623-us-en.pdf
Rumengan, J., Satriawan, B., Yanti, S., Fahizah, A., & Dewi, N. P. (2021). The influence of transformational leadership, personal value and organizational commitment to the performance of millennial employees in digital era in companies’ internet services provider (ISP) in Batam with motivation as an intervening variable. IAIC International Conference Series, 3(1), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.34306/conferenceseries.v3i2.470
Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.007
Sheninger, E. (2014). Pillars of digital leadership. International Center for Leadership in Education.
Shin, J., Mollah, M. A., & Choi, J. (2023). Sustainability and organizational performance in South Korea: The effect of digital leadership on digital culture and employees’ digital capabilities. Sustainability, 15(3), 2027. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032027
Sigala, M., & Kyriakidou, O. (2015). Creativity and innovation in the service sector. The Service Industries Journal, 35(6), 297–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2015.1010159
Silletto, C. (2023, July 12). Why do employees leave when they do? A timeline of employee turnover. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/why-do-employees-leave-when-timeline-employee-cara-silletto-mba-csp
Song, J. M., & Chung, C. Y. (2023). Female CEOs and investment efficiency in the Vietnamese market. Finance Research Letters, 58, 104362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104362
Su, Y.-Y., Paradis, K., & Kuo, Y.-K. (2023). Indonesian Gen Z embrace digital payments for convenience and discounts. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Business and Technology (ICBT 2023) (pp. 671–683). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-052-7_73
Sun, Z., Anderson, H., & Chi, J. (2023). Managerial foreign experience and corporate risk-taking: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 86, 102525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102525
Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
Tigre, F. B., Curado, C., & Henriques, P. L. (2023). Digital leadership: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 30(1), 40–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051822112313
Ting, I. W. K., Azizan, N. A. B., & Kweh, Q. L. (2015). Upper echelon theory revisited: The relationship between CEO personal characteristics and financial leverage decision. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 686–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.341
Turyadi, I., Zulkifli, Z., Tawil, M. R., Ali, H., & Sadikin, A. (2023). The role of digital leadership in organizations to improve employee performance and business success. Jurnal Ekonomi, 12(3), 1671–1677.
Ullah, I., Mirza, B., & Jamil, A. (2021). The influence of ethical leadership on innovative performance: Modeling the mediating role of intellectual capital. Journal of Management Development, 40(4), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMD-08-2020-0277
Vang, J., & Zellner, C. (2005). Introduction: Innovation in services. Industry & Innovation, 12(2), 147–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710500087875
Wokurka, G., Banschbach, Y., Houlder, D., & Jolly, R. (2017). Digital culture: Why strategy and culture should eat breakfast together. In G. Oswald & M. Kleinemeier (Eds.), Shaping the digital enterprise (pp. 85–98). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40967-2_5
Wu, A. (2024). Do female political leaders make the environment greener? Evidence from the United States. Kybernetes, 54(8), 4382–4402. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-09-2023-1932
Yameen, M., Bharadwaj, S., & Ahmad, I. (2021). University brand as an employer: demystifying employee attraction and retention. Vilakshan-XIMB Journal of Management, 18(1), 26–41. https://doi.org/10.1108/XJM-08-2020-0061
Ye, Q. (2025). Digital leadership enhances organizational resilience by fostering job crafting: The moderating role of organizational culture. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 24640. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-09144-2
Zeike, S., Bradbury, K., Lindert, L., & Pfaff, H. (2019). Digital leadership skills and associations with psychological well-being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(14), 2628. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16142628
Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). Research on employee creativity: A critical review and directions for future research. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 22, 165–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-7301(03)22004-1
Zhu, J., Zhang, B., Xie, M., & Cao, Q. (2022). Digital leadership and employee creativity: The role of employee job crafting and person–organization fit. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 827057. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.827057
Zreen, A., Farrukh, M., & Kanwal, N. (2021). Do HR practices facilitate innovative work behavior? Empirical evidence from higher education institutes. Human Systems Management, 40(5), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.3233/HSM-201001
Zuriati, H., Wahyuningsih, S., & Asri, R. W. P. (2024). The conceptual structure and thematic evolution of the digital leadership knowledge base. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(4), e2024073. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2024073
Copyright (c) 2025 Harris Prasetya Rahmandika, Yusuf Akbar Santoso, Dilla Imani, Nuri Herachwati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
1. The author(s) hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The author(s) retain publishing rights without restrictions
3. The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY).
