The difference in microleakage levels of nanohybrid composite resin using eighth-generation ethanol and isopropanol solvent bonding materials under moist and dry conditions (in vitro study)
Downloads
Background: Microleakage during restoration causes secondary caries. The shrinkage of nanohybrid composite resin can occur during the polymerization process, affected by both the selection of bonding materials featuring different solvents, such as ethanol and isopropanol, as well as contrasting conditions such as moist and dry. Purpose: This study aimed to determine and analyze the differences of microleakage level of nanohybrid composite resin using the eighth-generation bonding materials made from ethanol and isopropanol solvents under moist and dry conditions. Methods: This research constituted an experimental laboratory study. The samples were divided into four groups. Group I used a bonding material produced from ethanol under dry conditions. Group II used a bonding material produced from ethanol under moist conditions. Group III used a bonding material produced from isopropanol under dry conditions. Group IV used a bonding material produced from isopropanol under moist conditions. The levels of microleakage were subsequently tested using a stereo microscope. Results: Microleakage examination was performed by means of a stereo microscope to observe the methylene blue color penetration with assessment subsequently being performed on a scale of 0 to 3. The statistical results of a Kruskal-Wallis test showed that no significant differences occurred in any of the treatment groups (sig = 0.141, p<0.05). Conclusion: There was no difference in the microleakage levels of nanohybrid composite resin using eighth-generation bonding materials produced from ethanol and isopropanol solvents under moist and dry conditions.
Downloads
Hanabusa M, Mine A, Kuboki T, Momoi Y, Van Ende A, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J. Bonding effectiveness of a new ‘multi-mode' adhesive to enamel and dentine. J Dent. 2012; 40(6): 475–84.
dos Santos LGP, Felippe WT, Teixeira CS, Bortoluzzi EA, Felippe MCS. Endodontic re-instrumentation enhances hydroxyl ion diffusion through radicular dentine. Int Endod J. 2014; 47(8): 776–83.
Ayar MK, Yildirim T, Yesilyurt C. Nanoleakage within adhesive-dentin interfaces made with simplified ethanol-wet bonding. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2016; 30(22): 2511–21.
Al Qahtani MQ, Al Shethri SE. Shear bond strength of one-step self-etch adhesives with different co-solvent ingredients to dry or moist dentin. Saudi Dent J. 2010; 22(4): 171–5.
Hatrick CD, Eakle WS. Dental materials: clinical applications for dental assistants and dental hygienists. 3rd ed. St. Louise: Elsevier Saunders; 2015. p. 65–9.
Ferooz M, Basri F, Negahdari K, Bagheri R. Fracture toughness evaluation of hybrid and nano-hybrid resin composites after ageing under acidic environment. J Dent Biomater. 2015; 2(1): 18–23.
Jain N, Wadkar A. Effect of nanofiller technology on surface properties of nanofilled and nanohybrid composites. Int J Dent Oral Heal. 2015; 1(1): 1–5.
Sakaguchi RL, Powers JM. Craig's restorative dental materials. 13th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby; 2012. p. 73, 83, 117–8, 164–7.
Sooraparaju SG, Kanumuru PK, Nujella SK, Konda KR, Reddy KBK, Penigalapati S. A comparative evaluation of microleakage in class v composite restorations. Int J Dent. 2014; 2014: 1–4.
Costa DM, Somacal DC, Borges GA, Spohr AM. Bond capability of universal adhesive systems to dentin in self-etch mode after short-term storage and cyclic loading. Open Dent J. 2017; 11: 276–83.
Syafri M, Nugraheni T, Untara TE. Perbedaan kebocoran mikro resin komposit bulkfill vibrasi sonic dan resin komposit nanohibrid pada kavitas kelas I. J Kedokt Gigi. 2014; 5(2): 158–68.
Ekambaram M, Yiu CKY, Matinlinna JP. An overview of solvents in resin-dentin bonding. Int J Adhes Adhes. 2015; 57: 22–33.
Fleming PS, Johal A, Pandis N. Self-etch primers and conventional acid-etch technique for orthodontic bonding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2012; 142: 83–94.
Ritter A V., Boushell LW, Walter R, Sturdevant CM. Sturdevant's art and science of operative dentistry. 7th ed. St. Louise: Elsevier Mosby; 2018. p. 149–50.
Usha C, Ramarao S, John BM, Rajesh P, Swatha S. Evaluation of the shear bond strength of composite resin to wet and dry enamel using dentin bonding agents containing various solvents. J Clin Diagnostic Res. 2017; 11: ZC41–4.
Choi A-N, Lee J-H, Son S-A, Jung K-H, Kwon Y, Park J-K. Effect of dentin wetness on the bond strength of universal adhesives. Mater. 2017; 10(11): 1–13.
Monteiro TS, Kastytis P, Gonçalves LM, Minas G, Cardoso S. Dynamic wet etching of silicon through isopropanol alcohol evaporation. Micromachines. 2015; 6(10): 1534–45.
Nair M, Paul J, Kumar S, Chakravarthy Y, Krishna V, Shivaprasad. Comparative evaluation of the bonding efficacy of sixth and seventh generation bonding agents: an in-vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2014; 17: 27–30.
- Every manuscript submitted to must observe the policy and terms set by the Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi).
- Publication rights to manuscript content published by the Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) is owned by the journal with the consent and approval of the author(s) concerned.
- Full texts of electronically published manuscripts can be accessed free of charge and used according to the license shown below.
- The Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
