Validation of the Jamaican version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) in adults: JAM-OHIP study
Downloads
Background: The Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) is a widely used tool for measuring the effects of oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). However, the validity of the OHIP-14 in the Jamaican context, referred to as the Jamaican Oral Health Impact Profile (JAM-OHIP), has yet to be established. Purpose: To determine the validity of the Jamaican language version of the OHIP in evaluating the OHRQoL of Jamaican adults. Methods: The original English version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) was translated into the Jamaican language using forward and backward translation. The JAM-OHIP was used to evaluate the OHRQoL of 236 individuals at the University of the West Indies Dental Polyclinic. The overall fit was checked using a chi-square test (p > 0.05), comparative fit index (CFI), Tucker–Lewis index (TLI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and standardized root mean square residual (SRMR). Results: More DMFT (p < 0.01) was associated with high JAM-OHIP scores, and the most impacted domain was physical pain. Cronbach’s alpha and the standardized item alpha for the JAM-OHIP were 0.82. The overall fitting results for the CFA were χ²(68) = 80.558, p = 0.142, and χ²/g.l. = 1.185. The CFI and TLI were 0.996 and 0.994, respectively. The SRMR was 0.072 and the RMSEA was 0.028 (CI95% = [0.000; 0.050]) p = 0.953. Conclusions: The JAM-OHIP instrument was shown to be reliable and valid for the assessment of OHRQoL in the Jamaican adult population.
Downloads
MacEntee MI, Brondani M. Cross‐cultural equivalence in translations of the oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2016; 44(2): 109–18. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12198
Cherian JM, Kurian N, Varghese KG, Thomas HA. World Health Organization’s global oral health status report: Paediatric dentistry in the spotlight. J Paediatr Child Health. 2023; 59(7): 925–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.16427
Soares GH, Santiago PHR, Werneck RI, Michel-Crosato E, Jamieson L. A psychometric network analysis of OHIP-14 across Australian and Brazilian populations. JDR Clin Transl Res. 2021; 6(3): 333–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/2380084420939931
Dobaria N, Aapaliya P, Choudhary G, Sanadhya S, Jain S, Sharma N. Assessment and comparison of clinical dental status and its impact on oral health-related quality of life among rural and urban adults of Udaipur, India: A cross-sectional study. J Basic Clin Pharm. 2015; 6(2): 50. doi: https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-0105.152091
Ulfa W, Amalia R, Santoso AS. The relationship between tooth loss and pre-elderly nutritional status and quality of life. Dent J. 2023; 56(2): 80–6. doi: https://doi.org/10.20473/j.djmkg.v56.i2.p80-86
Bramantoro T, Prabandari YS, Ismail D, Tedjosasongko U. The development of early childhood caries impact on quality of life-Indonesia instrument as assessment instrument of dental caries impact on quality of life of children aged 3-5 years based on Indonesian community characteristics. Dent J. 2015; 48(4): 197–203. doi: https://doi.org/10.20473/j.djmkg.v48.i4.p197-203
Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short‐form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1997; 25(4): 284–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00941.x
Reissmann DR. Methodological considerations when measuring oral health–related quality of life. J Oral Rehabil. 2021; 48(3): 233–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12983
Brown M, Lockhart C, Thomas B, Rech R. Oral health related quality of life in an adult Jamaican population. Caribb Med J. 2020; : 1–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.48107/CMJ.2020.12.009
A CUNY Academic Commons Site. Jamaican Creole in social context, literature, and music. Jamaican Creole at York College – A Resource Site. 2023. Available from: https://jamaicancreole.commons.gc.cuny.edu/jamaican-creole-in-social-context-literature-and-music/. Accessed 2023 Dec 18.
World Health Organization. Oral health surveys: basic methods. 5th ed. World Health Organization; 2013. p. 125. web: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241548649
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Version 4.0.0. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2020. Available from: https://www.r-project.org/
Allaire JJ. RStudio: Integrated development environment for R. Version 1.3.959. 2020. web: https://www.r-project.org/conferences/useR-2011/abstracts/180111-allairejj.pdf
Rosseel Y. lavaan : An R package for structural equation modeling. J Stat Softw. 2012; 48(2): 1–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
Steiner M, Grieder S. EFAtools: An R package with fast and flexible implementations of exploratory factor analysis tools. J Open Source Softw. 2020; 5(53): 2521. doi: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.02521
Epskamp S. semPlot: Path diagrams and visual analysis of various SEM packages’ output. R Package Version 1.1.6. 2022. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/semPlot/index.html
Revelle W. psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research. R Package Version 2.4.3. 2024. Available from: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/psych/index.html
de Souza AC, Alexandre NMC, de Brito Guirardello E. Psychometric properties in instruments evaluation of reliability and validity. Epidemiol e Serviços Saúde. 2017; 26(3): 649–59. doi: https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742017000300022
Sürücü L, Maslakçi A. Validity and reliability in quantitative research. Bus Manag Stud An Int J. 2020; 8(3): 2694–726. doi: https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v8i3.1540
Lorenzo-Seva U, Ferrando PJ. MSA: The forgotten index for identifying inappropriate items before computing exploratory item factor analysis. Methodology. 2021; 17(4): 296–306. doi: https://doi.org/10.5964/meth.7185
Taherdoost H, Sahibuddin S, Jalaliyoon N. Exploratory factor analysis; concepts and theory. Adv Appl Pure Math. 2022; 27: 375–82. web: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4178683
Osborne JW, Costello AB, Kellow JT. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis. In: Best Practices in Quantitative Methods. SAGE Publications, Inc.; 2011. p. 86–99. doi: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995627.d8
Schreiber JB. Issues and recommendations for exploratory factor analysis and principal component analysis. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2021; 17(5): 1004–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.07.027
Tavakol M, Wetzel A. Factor analysis: a means for theory and instrument development in support of construct validity. Int J Med Educ. 2020; 11: 245–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.5f96.0f4a
Lim MK, Lai PSM, Wong PS, Othman S, Mydin FHM. Validation of the psychometric properties of the Malay advance care planning questionnaire. BMC Palliat Care. 2021; 20(1): 109. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-021-00790-7
Matore MEEM, Zainal MA, Kamaruddin M, Matore ERM. Reassessing the construct of ISIS in measuring SQ among polytechnic students using exploratory factor analysis (EFA). In: Proceedings of Mechanical Engineering Research. 2020. p. 240–2. web: https://www3.utem.edu.my/care/proceedings/merd20/pdf/07_Engineering_Education/104-p240_242.pdf
Shrestha N. Factor analysis as a tool for survey analysis. Am J Appl Math Stat. 2021; 9(1): 4–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.12691/ajams-9-1-2
Emanuelsson T. Factor analysis of ordinal variables: Polychoric and pearson correlations in the exploratory approach. Lund University; 2021. p. 1–37. web: https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9036533
Thompson B. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis: Understanding concepts and applications. American Psychological Association. Washington: American Psychological Association; 2004. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/10694-000
Feng Y, Lu J-J, Ouyang Z-Y, Xue L-X, Li T, Chen Y, Gao Z-R, Zhang S-H, Zhao J, Zhao Y-Q, Ye Q, Hu J, Feng Y-Z, Guo Y. The Chinese version of the oral health impact profile-14 (OHIP-14) questionnaire among college students: factor structure and measurement invariance across genders. BMC Oral Health. 2022; 22(1): 405. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02441-6
Couto P, Pereira PA, Nunes M, Mendes RA. Validation of a Portuguese version of the oral health impact profile adapted to people with mild intellectual disabilities (OHIP-14-MID-PT). Milgrom PM, editor. PLoS One. 2018; 13(6): e0198840. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0198840
León S, Bravo-Cavicchioli D, Correa-Beltrán G, Giacaman RA. Validation of the Spanish version of the oral health impact profile (OHIP-14Sp) in elderly Chileans. BMC Oral Health. 2014; 14(1): 95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6831-14-95
Htun KCSS, Peltzer K. Oral health-related quality of life among community dwelling middle-aged and older adults in an urban area in Magway region, Myanmar. Nagoya J Med Sci. 2019; 81(1): 103–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.18999/nagjms.81.1.103
Drachev S, Brenn T, Trovik T. Oral health-related quality of life in young adults: A survey of Russian undergraduate students. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018; 15(4): 719. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15040719
Kenig N, Sotiroska Ivanoska K, Nikolovska J. Psychometric properties of the 14 items oral health impact profile questionnaire translated into the Macedonian language. Acta Stomatol Croat. 2023; 57(2): 145–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.15644/asc57/2/5
Hair JF, Babin BJ, Black WC, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. 8th ed. Cengage; 2019. p. 813. web: https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Multivariate_Data_Analysis.html?id=0R9ZswEACAAJ&redir_esc=y
Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model A Multidiscip J. 1999; 6(1): 1–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Nye CD, Drasgow F. Assessing goodness of fit: simple rules of thumb simply do not work. Organ Res Methods. 2011; 14(3): 548–70. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110368562
Zhao Y. The performance of model fit measures by robust weighted least squares estimators in confirmatory factor analysis. The Pennsylvania State University; 2015. web: https://etda.libraries.psu.edu/catalog/24901
Riva F, Seoane M, Reichenheim ME, Tsakos G, Celeste RK. Adult oral health‐related quality of life instruments: A systematic review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2022; 50(5): 333–8. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdoe.12689
Copyright (c) 2024 Dental Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
- Every manuscript submitted to must observe the policy and terms set by the Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi).
- Publication rights to manuscript content published by the Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) is owned by the journal with the consent and approval of the author(s) concerned.
- Full texts of electronically published manuscripts can be accessed free of charge and used according to the license shown below.
- The Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
