Contrasting perceptions of male and female dental students regarding smile aesthetics based on their gingival display

Yessy Josephine Sijabat, C. Christnawati, Dyah Karunia

= http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/j.djmkg.v51.i4.p200-204
Abstract views = 189 times | views = 105 times

Abstract


Background: Perception consists of personal opinion in relation to an object. In terms of aesthetics, perception normally differs from one individual to another based on several factors such as gender. When expressing emotion, a smile is the most important facial expression whose aesthetics are constructed from a number of components, including gingival display. Purpose: This study aimed to establish the comparative perceptions of the smile aesthetics of male and female dental students based on their gingival display. Methods: 36 dental students, divided equally according to gender, were enrolled in this study. Photographic images of the smile of each subject were taken from a frontal direction with a Canon EOS 700D digital camera and subsequently printed. Assessments were conducted by comparing the photographs of subjects from the perspective of smile references based on the gingival display, followed by subject scoring on the basis of smile classification. Assessments were conducted twice within a two-week period to confirm test reliability. The data collected was analyzed by means of kappa statistic and U-Mann Whitney tests. Results: The test results indicated that all subjects demonstrated a coincidence in their analysis (κ=0.84). Statistical analysis showed that a score of 0.902 (p>0.05) had been produced by a U-Mann Whitney test. Conclusion: It can be concluded that no difference exists between male and female students in the perception of smile aesthetics based on the gingival display.

Keywords


gingival display; perception of aesthetic; smile aesthetics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Badran SA, Mustafa M. Perception of smile attractiveness by Laypeople – influence of profession and treatment experience. Br J Med Med Res. 2014; 4(20): 3777–86.

Câmara CA. Aesthetics in orthodontics: six horizontal smile lines. Dental Press J Orthod. 2010; 15(1): 118–31.

Avriliyanti F, Suparwitri S, Alhasyimi AA. Rinsing effect of 60% bay leaf (Syzygium polyanthum wight) aqueous decoction in inhibiting the accumulation of dental plaque during fixed orthodontic treatment. Dent J (Maj Ked Gigi). 2017; 50(1): 1–5.

Prabhu S, Divya M, Sneha K V, Veena N. Prevalence of malocclusion, aesthetic self-perception and their correlation among 18 to 24 years old college students in Chennai. J Oral Hyg Heal. 2017; 5(2): 1–4.

Musskopf ML, Rocha JM da, Rosing CK. Perception of smile esthetics varies between patients and dental professionals when recession defects are present. Braz Dent J. 2013; 24(4): 385–90.

Silva GC, Castilhos ED, Masotti AS, Junior SAR. Dental esthetic self-perception of brazilian dental students. RSBO. 2012; 9(4): 375–81.

Nurfitrah A, Christnawati C, Alhasyimi AA. Comparison of esthetic smile perceptions among male and female Indonesian dental students relating to the buccal corridors of a smile. Dent J (Maj Ked Gigi). 2017; 50(3): 127–30.

Abidia RF, Azam A, El –Hejazi AA, Al-Mugbel K. K, Haider MS, Al-Owaid NM. Female dental student’s perception of their dental aesthetics and desired dental treatment. Eur Sci J. 2017; 13(3): 171–81.

Ioi H, Nakata S, Counts AL. Effects of buccal corridors on smile esthetics in Japanese. Angle Orthod. 2009; 79(4): 628–33.

Gaddale R, Desai SR, Mudda JA, Karthikeyan I. Lip repositioning. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2014; 18(2): 254–8.

Schabel BJ, Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara JA. Clinical photography vs digital video clips for the assessment of smile esthetics. Angle Orthod. 2010; 80(4): 678–84.

Sepolia S, Sepolia G, Kaur R, Gautam DK, Jindal V, Gupta SC. Visibility of gingiva - an important determinant for an esthetic smile. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2014; 18(4): 488–92.

España P, Tarazona B, Paredes V. Smile esthetics from odontology students’ perspectives. Angle Orthod. 2014; 84(2): 214–24.

Omar H, Tai Y. Perception of smile esthetics among dental and nondental students. J Educ Ethics Dent. 2014; 4(2): 54–60.

Ioi H, Nakata S, Counts AL. Influence of gingival display on smile aesthetics in Japanese. Eur J Orthod. 2010; 32(6): 633–7.

Prasanti AA, Santosa O. Perbedaan indeks periodontal dan skor pembesaran gingiva kelompok pemakai dan bukan pemakai pesawat ortodonti cekat. J Kedokt Diponegoro. 2016; 5(1): 1–8.

Kiani H, Bahir U, Durrani OK, Zulfiqar K. Comparison of difference in perception between orthodontists and laypersons in terms of variations in buccal corridor space using visual analogue scale. POJ. 2013; 5(2): 67–72.

Bilal R. Self perception and satisfaction with dental esthetics in dental students of Qassim region of Saudi Arabia. Pakistan oral Dent J. 2016; 36(3): 399–403.

Handayani S, Hardjajani T, Yuliadi I. Perbedaan perilaku seksual mahasiswa laki-laki UNS yang tinggl di kos dan tidak tinggal di kos ditinjau dari interaksi dengan teman sebaya. J Ilm Psikol Candrajiwa. 2013; 2(4): 70–82.

An S-M, Choi S-Y, Chung Y-W, Jang T-H, Kang K-H. Comparing esthetic smile perceptions among laypersons with and without orthodontic treatment experience and dentists. Korean J Orthod. 2014; 44(6): 294–303.

Suzuki L, Machado AW, Bittencourt MAV. An evaluation of the influence of gingival display level in the smile esthetics. Dental Press J Orthod. 2011; 16(5): 1–10.

Zawawi KH, Malki GA, Al-Zahrani MS, Alkhiary YM. Effect of lip position and gingival display on smile and esthetics as perceived by college students with different educational backgrounds. Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2013; 5: 77–80.

Kallidass P, Srinivas S, Charles A, Davis D, Sushil Charravarthi NC. Smile characteristics in orthodontics: a concept review. Int J Orofac Res. 2017; 2(1): 1–4.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats