Comparison of esthetic smile perceptions among male and female Indonesian dental students relating to the buccal corridors of a smile

Astriana Nurfitrah, C. Christnawati, Ananto Ali Alhasyimi

= http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/j.djmkg.v50.i3.p127-130
Abstract views = 966 times | downloads = 529 times

Abstract


Background: A smile constitutes a form of measurement as to whether or not an orthodontic treatment has proved successful. A smile is said to be ideal if a balance exists between the shape of the face and teeth. One benchmark used to assess the quality of an ideal smile is that of buccal corridors. These are formed of the black space between the lateral edge of maxillary posterior teeth and the corner of the lip which appears during the action of smiling. Evaluating the contrasting perceptions of male and female smiles based on buccal corridor aspects is considered important to identifying the specific qualities an ideal smile. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the difference between the perceptions of an ideal smile held by Indonesian dental students of both genders based on buccal corridors. Methods: A total of 36 dental students, equally divided between male and female students and ranging in age from 18-21 years old, were enrolled in this study. The smiles of all subjects were photographed from the front for later assessment by the subjects themselves. Assessment was undertaken twice, with a two-week interval between the first and second, by comparing subjects’ photographs with reference pictures of buccal corridors. Data gathered were analyzed by using kappa-statistic and U-Mann Whitney. Results: The results indicated that all the subjects showed a good level of coincidence in their analysis (κ=0.76). Statistical analysis showed that the score of 0.123 (p>0.05) was shown in U-Mann Whitney. Conclusion: Indonesian male and female dental students have the same perception of an aesthetic smile with regard to its buccal corridor.

Keywords


buccal corridors; ideal smile; perception

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alhasyimi AA, Sunarintyas S, Soesatyo MH. Pengaruh implantasi subkutan logam kobalt kromium sebagai bahan alternatif mini screw orthodontics terhadap reaksi jaringan kelinci albino. Maj Ked Gigi Ind. 2015; 1(1): 94-101.

Avriliyanti F, Suparwitri S, Alhasyimi AA. Rinsing effect of 60% bay leaf (Syzygium polyanthum wight) aqueous decoction in inhibiting the accumulation of dental plaque during fixed orthodontic treatment. Dent J (Maj Ked Gigi). 2017; 50(1): 1–5.

Monica GA. Gambaran senyum pasien pasca perawatan ortodonsia (kajian foto frontal). Indonesia J Dent. 2007; 14(2): 136–45.

Davis NC. Smile design. Dent Clin North Am. 2007; 51: 299–318.

Ioi H, Nakata S, Counts AL. Effects of buccal corridors on smile esthetics in Japanese. Angle Orthod. 2009; 79(4): 628–33.

Branco NCC, Janson G, de Freitas MR, Morais J. Width of buccal and posterior corridors: differences between cases treated with asymmetric and symmetric extractions. Dental Press J Orthod. 2012; 17(5): 138–44.

Nascimento DC, dos Santos ÊR, Machado AWL, Bittencourt MAV. Influence of buccal corridor dimension on smile esthetics. Dental Press J Orthod. 2012; 17(5): 145–50.

Janson G, Branco NC, Fernandes TMF, Sathler R, Garib D, Lauris JRP. Influence of orthodontic treatment, midline position, buccal corridor and smile arc on smile attractiveness. Angle Orthod. 2011; 81(1): 153–61.

Zaib F, Waheed-ul-Hameed. Effect of buccal corridors width on smile esthetics. Pak Orthod J. 2009: 1–5.

Cardoso-Leite P, Gorea A. On the perceptual/motor dissociation: a review of concepts, theory, experimental paradigms and data interpretations. Seeing Perceiving. 2010; 23(2): 89–151.

da Silva GC, de Castilhos ED, Masotti AS, Rodrigues-Junior AR. Dental esthetic self-perception of Brazilian dental students. RSBO. 2012; 9(4): 375–81.

Samorodnitzky-Naveh GR, Geiger SB, Levin L. Patients’ satisfaction with dental esthetics. J Am Dent Assoc. 2007; 138: 805–8.

Ring P, Neyse L, David-Barett T, Schmidt U. Gender differences in performance predictions: evidence from the cognitive reflection test. Front Psychol. 2016; 7: 1–7.

Tortopodis D, Hatzikyriakos A, Kokoti M, Menexes G, Tsiggos N. Evaluation of the relationship between subjects’ perception and professional assessment of esthetic treatment needs. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2007; 19:154–163.

Kristjánsson Á, Campana G. Where perception meets memory: a review of repetition priming in visual search tasks. Atten, Percept, Psychophys. 2010; 72(1): 5–18.

Tikku T, Khanna R, Maurya R, Ahmad N. Role of buccal corridor in smile esthetics and its correlation with underlying skeletal and dental structures. Indian J Dent Res. 2012; 23: 187–94.

Martin AJ, Buschang PH, Boley JC, Taylor RW, McKinney TW. The impact of buccal corridors on smile attractiveness. Eur J Orthod. 2007; 29: 530–7.

Oshagh M, Zarif NH, Bahramnia F. Evaluation of the effect of buccal corridor size on smile attractiveness. Eur J Esthet Dent. 2010; 5(4): 370–80.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats