Counter-hegemony of the East Java Biennale art community against the domination of hoax content reproduction

Jokhanan Kristiyono, Rachmah Ida, Musta'in Mashud

= http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/mkp.V33I12020.26-35
Abstract views = 320 times | downloads = 228 times

Abstract


This research analyses and describes in detail how the digital biennale activities that are a part of the Indonesian Digital art community has become a form of criticism and silent resistance to the social hegemony. It refers to the ideology, norms, rules, and myths that exist in modern society in Indonesia, especially the reproduction of hoax content. Hoax refers to the logic people who live in a world of cyber media with all of its social implications. This phenomenon is a problem, and it is at the heart of the exploration of the art community in East Java Biennale. The critical social theory perspective of Gramsci’s theory forms the basis of this research analysis. The qualitative research approach used a digital ethnomethodology research method focused on the online and offline social movements in the Biennale Art Community. The data collection techniques used were observation and non-active participation in the process of reproduction-related to the exhibition of Indonesian Biennale digital artworks. It was then analyzed using Gramsci’s hegemony theory. The purpose of this study was to describe the process of social movements in a digital format conducted by the Indonesian Biennale when reproducing works of art to counteract the dominance and hegemony of the Hoax phenomenon in Indonesia. The benefit of this research was that it obtained a preposition of Gramsci’s hegemony theory in the world of digital art as created by contemporary Indonesian Biennale artists. Digital technology has had a tremendous effect on the media industry, government, trade, informal industry sector, human resources, urban planning, services, disaster relief, health, education, religion, artistic and cultural expression, in addition to various other fields. The conclusion obtained from this research is that there is a formation of a new hegemony, a digital hegemony. This new hegemony is of particular concern for the digital artists in East Java Biennale. Through the digital format works, the artists also try to communicate their art as a form of silent resistance, protest, and criticism of the hegemony that occurs in society, referring to the ideology, norms, and myths. It can be called a digital counter-hegemony.s


Keywords


East Java Biennale; art communities; social hegemony; hoax; counter-hegemony

Full Text:

PDF

References


Achmad ZA & Ida R (2019) The shifting role of the listeners in the mediamorphosis process of culture radio: A case study of Jodhipati 106.1 FM. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik 32 (3):240-250. http://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.V32I32019.240-250.

Ahmad A, Mahmood QK, Saud M, & Mas’udah S (2019) Women in democracy: The political participation of women. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik 32 (2):114-122. http://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.V32I22019.114-122.

Bruhn KL (2013) Art and Youth Culture of the Post-Reformasi Era: Social Engagement, Alternative Expression, and the Public Sphere in Yogyakarta. Ohio University.

Bruhn K (2015). Art and social engagement in Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Ketjilber moving and the legacy of rice canines. Seismopolite Journal of Art & Politics 13.

Carroll WK (2010) Crisis, movements, counter-hegemony: In search of the new. Interface 2 (2):168-198.

Castells M (2010) The power of identity. The Information Age Economy Society and Culture. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444318234.

Chalmers I (2006) Indonesia: An Introduction to Contemporary Traditions. Oxford: University Press Oxford.

Cohen MI (2016) Inventing the Performing Arts: Modernity and Tradition in Colonial Indonesia. University of Hawai’i Press.

Djatiprambudi D (2005) Pembentukan seni rupa modern di Asia Tenggara. Jurnal Seni Rupa FBS Unimed 2 (01):15-26.

Hepp A (2013) The communicative figurations of mediatized worlds: Mediatization research in times of the ‘mediation of everything. European Journal of Communication 28 (6):615-629. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323113501148.

Ida R (2015) Imagining community in contemporary Surabaya. In: Hatley B (eds). Performing Contemporary Indonesia. Celebrating Identity, Constructing Community. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill. 83-97. https://doi.org/10.1163/ 9789004284937.

Jurriëns E (2017) Digital art: Hacktivism and Social Engagement. In: Jurriens E & Tapsell R (eds). Digital Indonesia: Connectivity and Divergence. Singapore: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute. 207-224.

Jurriëns E & Tapsell R (2018) Challenges and Opportunities of the Digital ‘Revolution’ in Indonesia. In: Jurriens E (ed). Digital Indonesia. Connectivity and Divergence. Singapore: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute Singapore. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1355/9789814786003.

Kumar S (2011) The exercise of hegemony in contemporary culture and media, and the need for a counter-hegemony initiative. Social Scientist 39 (11/12):33. www.jstor.org/stable/23076330.

McCafferty D (2011) Activism vs slacktivism. Communications of the ACM 54 (12):17-19. https://doi.org/10.1145/2043174.2043182.

Murray S (2006) New Media Anxiety: Art History and the Problem of Modern Technology. Dissertation, Cornell University Graduate School.

Naz A, Khan W, Daraz U, & Hussain M (2012) The crises of identity: Globalization and its impacts on socio-cultural and psychological identity among Pakhtuns of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 1 (1).

Niemojewski R (2010) The Rise of the Contemporary Biennial 1984-2009. London: Royal College of Art.

Niemojewski R (2013). Turning the tide: The oppositional past and uncertain future of the contemporary Biennial. Seismopolite Journal of Art & Politics 6.

Niemojewski R (2018) Contemporary art Biennials: Decline or resurgence? Cultural politics 14 (1).

Pink S, Horst H, Postill J, Hjorth L, Lewis T, & Tacchi J (2015) Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practices. Los Angeles, United States: Sage Publications Limited.

Tufekci Z (2014) Social movements and governments in the digital age: Evaluating a complex landscape. Journal of International Affairs, 68 (1).


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik

Indexing by:

     

     

       

View MKP Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License