Police conduct toward complainants of crime: Cross-sectional study of Punjab Police
The continual debate about the purpose, role, and function of the police for making the well-known organization is of keen interest for scholars. The present study aimed to explore the role of police conduct and its relationship with the complainants of crime in Pakistan’s geographical area. The study utilized a quantitative research design to gather data from the field. A research instrument prepared to collect the data from respondents who have ever interacted with the police. The sample size of 385 respondents selected for the known population and multistage and proportionate random sampling techniques were applied to draw the sample. The study was limited to Gujrat District in Punjab Province, and respondents selected through this universe. The study revealed significant barriers that restrict the police department’s efficiency and gain public trust in them. Theoretically, it was beneficial for elevating Pakistani criminology on the subject and practice; the research provides insights for taking the appropriate measures for better police-public liaison. The study’s findings revealed that the complainants generally agreed that they have limited trust in the police and that political interference is one of the major causes of lack of public trust.
Abbas A, Eliyana A, Ekowati D, Saud M, Raza A, & Wardani R (2020) Data set on coping strategies in the digital age: The role of psychological well-being and social capital among university students in Java Timor, Surabaya, Indonesia. Data in Brief 30:105583. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.dib.2020.105583.
Abubakar DS, Othman ZB, & Mustaffa JB (2017) Community policing participation intention and the indirect effect of attitudes toward the police: A proposed model. International Journal of Management Research and Reviews 7 (3):225-236.
Akram MB, Bhutto NA, & Mahmood QK (2018) Job satisfaction among police officers in District Rawalpindi, Pakistan: Role of demographic, social and psychological factors. Journal of Grassroots 52 (1):188-199.
Albrecht JF (2017) Analyzing the application of competing theories of justice into American and Pakistani policing strategies. Pakistan Journal of Criminology 9 (3):1-23.
Alvi HA (2011) Winning Hearts and Minds: The “Rastoon” Deradicalization Program in Swat. Cambridge: John F. Kennedy School of Government.
Aman J, Akram MB, Mas’udah S, Saud M, & Manj YN (2019) Parental involvement for better education: The relationship between parental awareness, emotional support, and children’s academic achievement at secondary level. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik 32 (4):334-345. http://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.V32I42019.334-345.
Aulakh AMA & Khan RAR (2005) Crime & Criminology: A Comparative Study in the Context of Islamic Republic of Pakistan. Rawalpindi: Federal Law House.
Bradford B, Jackson J, & Stanko EA (2009) Contact and confidence: Revisiting the impact of public encounters with the police. Policing & society 19 (1):20-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10439460802457594.
De Schutter O (2019) International Human Rights Law. London: Cambridge University Press.
Frantzen D (2010) Canine sniffs and policing the drug war. Criminal Justice Review 35 (4):438-452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016810363785.
Gold F (2018) Investigating and Prosecuting Law Enforcement Sexual Misconduct Cases. United States Attorneys’ Bulletin 66:77-92.
Jackson J & Sunshine J (2007) Public confidence in policing: A neo-Durkheimian perspective. British Journal of Criminology 47 (2):214-233. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azl031.
Khan N & Khan S (2017) An analysis of policing and problems existing in policing of Pakistan: A content analysis approach. Journal of Sociology 1 (1):54-65.
Lai RY (2010) System and method for generating web service architecture using web services structured methodology. United States Patent No. 7,698,398.
O’Connor DJ (2005) Integrating human behavior factors into design: An examination of behaviors that increase or reduce harm from fires. Fire Protection Engineering 28:8-20.
Packman D (2010) National Police Misconduct Reporting System. Washington DC: Cato Institute.
Paoline III EA, Myers SM, & Worden RE (2000) Police culture, individualism, and community policing: Evidence from two police departments. Justice Quarterly 17 (3):575-605. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820000094671.
Sanders CB & Langan D (2019) New public management and the extension of police control: community safety and security networks in Canada. Policing and Society 29 (5):566-578. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2018.1427744.
Saud M, Ida R, & Mashud M (2020) Democratic practices and youth in political participation: A doctoral study. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth 25 (1):800-808. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2020.1746676.
Stoudt BG, Torre ME, Bartley P, Bissel E, Bracy F, Caldwell H, & Lizama S (2019) Researching at the community-university borderlands: Using public science to study policing in the South Bronx. Education Policy Analysis Archives 27 (56):3-41. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.27.2623.
Tankebe J & Asif M (2016) Police legitimacy and support for vigilante violence in Pakistan. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice 40 (4):343-362. https://doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2016.1217425.
Ullah F & Ibrar M (2019) Effectiveness of police public services mechanism in crime reduction in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Criminology 11 (1):131-140.
Waseem Z (2019) ‘Brothers in arms’? A police-paramilitary partnership in Karachi. Policing and Society 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2019.1705824.
Weitzer R & Tuch S (2002) Perception of racial profiling: Race, class, and personal experience. Criminology 40 (2):435-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00962.x.
Wu Y, Sun I, & Triplett R (2009) Race, class or neighborhood context: Which matters more in measuring satisfaction with police?. Justice Quarterly 26 (1):125-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820802119950.
Copyright of this journal is possession of Editorial Board and Journal Manager, by the knowledge of the author, while the moral right of the publication belongs to the author.
The formal legal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA), implies that publication can be used for non-commercial purposes in its original form (cannot be modified).
Every publication (printed/electronic) are open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.