Gender representation and language politeness in speech acts: A pragmatic study
Downloads
Language affects society because linguistic forms treat men and women discriminatively as a reflection of the strong influence of language on the culture or habits of the speaking community. This study aimed to describe the representation of gender in speech and language politeness of senior high school and vocational school students in Samarinda City and Kutai Kertanegara Regency. The method used in this research was descriptive qualitative. The results of this study showed first, for the speech form by female students towards female teachers, they dominantly used the following forms: positive speech, expressive speech, and assertive speech. Second, for the speech form of female students towards male teachers, they preferred the form: expressive speech and assertive speech. Third, for the speech form of male students towards female teachers, they used the following forms: positive speech, commissive speech, and assertive speech. Fourth, the speech form of male students towards male teachers was expressive. Fifth, gender representation in student's language politeness showed that female students were more likely to comply and male students were more likely to deviate from the principles of linguistic politeness. This study concludes female students followed the principle of language politeness towards female teachers. Male students expressed more deviations towards male teachers.
Adzawla W, Azumah SB, Anani PY, & Donkoh SA (2019) Gender perspectives of climate change adaptation in two selected districts of Ghana. Heliyon 5 (11):e02854. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02854.
Al-Ghamdi NA, Almansoob NT, & Alrefaee Y (2019) Pragmatic failure in the realization of the speech act of responding to compliments among yemeni EFL undergraduates. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature 25 (4):227-240. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2019-2504-14.
Andreoli F & Olivera J (2020) Preferences for redistribution and exposure to tax-benefit schemes in Europe. European Journal of Political Economy 63 (March):101880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101880.
Buyle A & De Smet H (2018) Meaning in a changing paradigm: The semantics of you and the pragmatics of thou. Language Sciences 68: 42-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2017.12.004.
Crible L, Abuczki Á, BurkÅ¡aitienÄ— N, Furkó P, Nedoluzhko A, RackeviÄienÄ— S, & Zikánová Å (2019) Functions and translations of discourse markers in TED talks: A parallel corpus study of underspecification in five languages. Journal of Pragmatics 142: 139-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.012.
Culpeper J & Gillings M (2019) Pragmatics: Data trends. Journal of Pragmatics 145: 4-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.004.
Dwipayana IKA, Sudiana IN, & Sutama IM (2014) Kesantunan tuturan dalam pilihan kode bahasa siswa di komunitas SMAN 1 Ubud ditinjau dari perspektif gender: Sebuah kajian sosiopragmatik. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia 3 (1):1-10.
Dwiyono Y, Mulawarman WG, Panji OP, Salaim NA, Ikhsan M (2021) Implementation of national examination based on computer based test at Vocational School 1 North Sangatta. Cypriot Journal of Educational 16 (1):86-95. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i1.5510.
Febriadina ZF (2018) Kesantunan berbahasa dalam interaksi pembelajaran bahasa Indonesia di kelas XI SMK Negeri 1 Plupuh Sragen. Thesis, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta.
Freed AF (1996) Language and Gender Research in An Experimental Setting 1. London: Routledge.
Haavik TK, Antonsen S, Rosness R, & Hale A (2019) HRO and RE: A pragmatic perspective. Safety Science 117: 479-489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.08.010.
Jones L (2016) Language and Gender Identities. London: Routledge.
Latifa A (2021) Language varieties of woman's conversation in yutube channel of Emma Watson in HeForShe program: A conversation analysis study. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation 4 (1):221-227. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2021.4.1.22.
Leech GN (2014a) A Linguistic Guide to English Poetry (Vol. 4). London: Routledge.
Leech GN (2014b) The Pragmatics of Politeness. USA: Oxford University Press.
Marques I, Remington T, & Bazavliuk V (2020) Encouraging skill development: Evidence from public-private partnerships in education in Russia's regions. European Journal of Political Economy 63 (May 2019):101888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101888.
Matthews D, Biney H, & Abbot-Smith K (2018) Individual differences in children's pragmatic ability: A review of associations with formal language, social cognition, and executive functions. Language Learning and Development 14 (3):186-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2018.1455584.
Mavisakalyan A (2015) Gender in language and gender in employment. Oxford Development Studies 43 (4):403-424.
Mugford G (2020) Mexican politeness: An empirical study on the reasons underlying/motivating practices to construct local interpersonal relationships. Russian Journal of Linguistics 24 (1):31-55. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-2020-24-1-31-55.
Musyawir M (2017) Penyimpangan prinsip kesantunan berbahasa dalam interaksi belajar-mengajar Bahasa Indonesia siswa kelas XI SMA Negeri 2 Panca Rijang Sidenreng Rappang. Thesis, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar.
O'Connor C & Joffe H (2020) Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: Debates and practical Guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 19: 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220.
Papavlasopoulou S, Sharma K, & Giannakos MN (2020) Coding activities for children: Coupling eye-tracking with qualitative data to investigate gender differences. Computers in Human Behavior 105: 105939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.003.
Pinto M, Sales D, & Fernández-Pascual R (2019) Gender perspective on information literacy: An interdisciplinary and multidimensional analysis within higher education settings. Library and Information Science Research 41 (4):100979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2019.100979.
Rasyid R (2018) Analisis kesantunan berbahasa berbasis gender dalam interaksi pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di SMA Negeri 6 Sidenreng Rappang. Thesis, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar.
Ruggiano N & Perry TE (2019) Conducting secondary analysis of qualitative data: Should we, can we, and how? Qualitative Social Work 18 (1):81-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325017700701.
Sakip SRM, Akhir NM, & Omar SS (2015) Determinant factors of successful public parks in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 170: 422-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.003.
Soutar I & Mitchell C (2018) Towards pragmatic narratives of societal engagement in the UK energy system. Energy Research and Social Science 35 (October 2017):132-139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.10.041.
Steege R, Taegtmeyer M, McCollum R, Hawkins K, Ormel H, Kok M, & Theobald S (2018) How do gender relations affect the working lives of close to community health service providers? Empirical research, a review and conceptual framework. Social Science and Medicine 209 (November 2017):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.05.002.
Thomann E & Maggetti M (2020) Designing research with qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): Approaches, challenges, and tools. Sociological Methods and Research 49 (2):356-386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117729700.
Traugott EC (2019) Whither historical pragmatics? A cognitively-oriented perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 145: 25-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.006.
Copyright of this journal is possession of Editorial Board and Journal Manager, by the knowledge of the author, while the moral right of the publication belongs to the author.
The formal legal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA), implies that publication can be used for non-commercial purposes in its original form (cannot be modified).
Every publication (printed/electronic) are open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.