Electoral volatility of the 2019 presidential election: A study in Jakarta and Depok, Indonesia

Aryo Wasisto

= http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/mkp.V34I32021.281-292
Abstract views = 650 times | downloads = 264 times


In democratic countries around the world, electoral volatility is a challenge for political actors. Because one vote is significant, political parties and candidates are increasingly difficult to predict the preferences of citizens. This study aimed to analyze motivational factors that make voters change their choice of votes. This study employed a quantitative method and proposed three variables, including political sophistication, candidate evaluation, and exposure to media campaigns. The results of the logistic regression show that voters who positively evaluate candidates become loyal voters (p-value £ 0.001). Meanwhile, voters who consume political information from social media and the internet intensively, as well as those who are interested in politics are non-volatile voters (p-value £ 0.001 and p-value £ 0.01, respectively). These findings contrast with studies in parliamentary countries where interest in politics motivates voters to change their votes. In these analyzes, this study focuses on examining the inter-election volatility of 2014-2019 in the context of the presidential election in Indonesia. The data were obtained from a post-2019 election survey (non-probability sampling), for respondents in South Jakarta, East Jakarta, and Depok City, who had elected the president in the 2014 and 2019 elections.


electoral volatility; exposure to media; political sophistication; presidential election; switched voters

Full Text:



Aspinall E & Berenschot W (2019) Democracy for Sale Elections, Clientalism, And the State in Indonesia. English: Cornell University Press.

Berger D (2017) Introduction to binary logistic regression and propensity score analysis. [Accessed 20 April 2020]. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/320505159_Introduction_to_Binary_Logistic_Regression_and_Propensity_Score_Analysis/link/59e8cbb80f7e9bc89b5cb6f2/download.

Blais A (2004) How many voters change their minds in the month preceding an election? PS - Political Science and Politics 37 (4):801-803. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096504045184.

Converse P (1966) Information Flow and the Stability of Partisan Attitudes. In: Campbell A, Converse PE, Miller, WE & Donald E. (ed.). Elections and the political order. New York: John Wiley.

Dalton RJ (2007) Partisan mobilization, cognitive mobilization and the changing American electorate. Electoral Studies 26 (2):274-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2006.04.009.

Dalton RJ & Wattenberg MP (2000) Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. London: Oxford Scholarship Online. http://doi.org/10.1093/0199253099.001.0001.

Dassonneville R (2012) Electoral volatility, political sophistication, trust and efficacy: A study on changes in voter preferences during the Belgian regional elections of 2009. Acta Politica 47 (1):18-41. https://doi.org/10.1057/ap.2011.19.

Dassonneville R (2014) Political sophistication and vote intention switching: The timing of electoral volatility in the 2009 German election campaign. German Politics 23 (3):174-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644008.2014.949682.

Dassonneville R (2018) Electoral volatility and parties’ ideological responsiveness. European Journal of Political Research 57 (4):808-828. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12262.

Dassonneville R, Blais A, & Dejaeghere Y (2015) Staying with the party, switching or exiting? A comparative analysis of determinants of party switching and abstaining. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 25 (3):387-405. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2015.1016528.

Dewitt JR (2013) Political sophistication and presidential candidate considerations: Disentangling the effects of knowledge, interest, and media exposure. The American Review of Politics 33:271-293.

Fossati D (2019) The resurgence of ideology in Indonesia: Political islam, aliran and political behaviour. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 38 (2):119-148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1868103419868400.

Geers S & Bos L (2017) Priming issues, party visibility, and party evaluations: The impact on vote switching. Political Communication 34 (3):344-366. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2016.1201179.

Geers S, Bos L, & De Vreese CH (2017) Informed switchers? How the impact of election news exposure on vote change depends on political information efficacy. International Journal of Communication 11:1857-1878.

Geers S & Strömbäck J (2018) Patterns of intra-election volatility: The impact of political knowledge. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties 29 (3):1-20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2018.1531010.

Gherghina S (2015) Party organization and electoral volatility in central and eastern Europe: Enhancing voter loyalty (Vol. 1). London: Routledge.

Granberg D & Holmberg S (1990) The berelson paradox reconsidered intention-behavior changers in U.S. and Swedish election campaigns. The Public Opinion Quarterly 54 (4):530-550. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2749339.

Herrnson P (2004) Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington. Washington DC: CQ Press.

Kruikemeier S, Gattermann K, & Vliegenthart R (2018) Understanding the dynamics of politicians’ visibility in traditional and social media. Information Society 34 (4):215-228. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2018.1463334.

Kuhn U (2009) Stability and change in party preference Ursina. Swiss Political Science Review 15:463-494. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511499876.

Lachat R (2007) A Heterogeneous Electorate: Political Sophistication, Predispostion Strength, and the Voting Decision Process. Nomos Verlag.: Baden-Baden.

Lawson C, Lenz GS, Baker A, & Myers M (2010) Looking like a winner: Candidate appearance and electoral success in new democracies. World Politics 62 (4):561-593. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887110000195.

Lazarsfeld PF, Berelson B, & Gaudet H (1949) The people’s choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.

Linek L (2016) Legitimacy, political disaffection and discontent with (democratic) politics in the Czech Republic. Acta Politologica 8 (2):51-73.

Luskin RC (1990) Explaining political sophistication. Political Behavior 12 (4):331-361. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992793.

Macdonald SE, Rabinowitz G, & Listhaug O (1995) Political sophistication and models of issue voting. British Journal of Political Science 25 (4):453-483. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400007316.

Mainwaring S (1998) Electoral volatility in Brazil. Party Politics 4 (4):523-545. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068898004004006.

Mainwaring S, Gervasoni C, & España-Najera A (2017) Extra- and within-system electoral volatility. Party Politics 23 (6):623-635. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068815625229.

McAlister I & Farrell DM (2006) Voter satisfaction and electoral systems: Does preferential voting in candidate-centered systems make a difference permalink. European Journal of Political Research 45:723-749. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/3vs886v9.pdf.

Mietzner M (2013) Money, Power, and Ideology: Political Parties in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia. Singapore: NUS Press.

Miller WE (1991) Party identification, realignment, and party voting: Back to the basics. American Political Science Review 85 (2):557-568. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963175.

Saragih HP (2019) Real count KPU 68%, Jokowi unggul 13 juta suara atas Prabowo. CNBC Indonesia, 6 May. [Acceesed 12 June 2021]. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20190506090207-4-70623/real-count-kpu-68-jokowi-unggul-13-juta-suara-atas-prabowo.

Stiers D (2015) The effect of political sophistication on the intended turnout in first- and second-order elections in Belgium. [Accessed 20 April 2020]. https://limo.libis.be/primo-explore/fulldisplay?docid=LIRIAS1861877&context=L&vid=Lirias&search_scope=Lirias&tab=default_tab〈=en_US&fromSitemap=1.

Suzuki M (1994) Evolutionary voter sophistication and political business cycles. Public Choice 81:241-261. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01053232.

Tapsell R (2013) Media Power in Indonesia: Oligarchs, Citizens and the Digital Revolution. New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.

Torcal M & Montero JR (2006) Political Disaffection in Contemporary Democracies: Social Capital, Institutions and Politics. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203086186.

Van der Meer TW, Van Elsas RL, & Van der Brug W (2015) Are volatile voters erratic, whimsical or seriously picky? A panel study of 58 waves into the nature of electoral volatility (The Netherlands 2006-2010). Party Politics 21 (2):100-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068812472570.

Winters JA (2013) Oligarchy and democracy in Indonesia. Indonesia (96 Special Issue):11-33. https://doi.org/10.5728/indonesia.96.0099.

Zaller JR (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. London: Cambridge University Press.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik

Indexing by:




View MKP Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License