The phenomenon of bubu tradition in the cycle of time: Portrait of reciprocity in rural Madura
Downloads
Bubu is a form of reciprocity that occurs in Madura generally and Langkap Village particularly. Generally, the exchange is made by the community as a form of "donations” to the celebration host. The host hopes for a return in the future. The reciprocal incident that occurred in Madura was not just a hope but more of an "obligation” to pay the "donation” or bubu that had been given on the previous occasion. This study seeks to describe the form and meaning of the bubu as well as to explain the changes that occur in the bubu phenomenon which used to be only in the form of voluntary donations into various forms of bubu with their meanings. The research design used was an ethnographic study with a moderate method where the researcher was occasionally directly involved in the tradition. The results of this study reveal several forms of bubu that occur in Langkap Village with different ways and meanings with the same motivation. The bubu given is a transaction of accounts payable and investment with the hope of a return in the future. More than that, there are social sanctions that will await if the bubu that have been given are not returned with the same value.
Antropedia (2018) Antropologi ekonomi (resiprositas). Antropedia Kawan Undip. 01 August [Accessed 21 April 2020]. https://antropediakawanundip.wordpress.com/2018/08/01/antropologi-ekonomi-resiprositas/.
Bakhri S (2018) Resiprositas dalam sunat poci dan mantu poci masyarakat Tegal. Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi 7 (1):94-109.
Belshaw CS (1981) Tukar Menukar Tradisional dan Pasar Modern. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.
Beresnaviciute V (2003) Dimension of social integration: Appraisal of theoritical approach. Etnicity Studies Journal 96-108.
Burke M, Hooper D, Khusida B, Lyon P, Mynard J, Sampson R, & Taw P (2018) Observing a social learning space: A summary of an ethnographic project in progress. Relay Journal 1 (1):209-220.
Creswell JW (2012) Research Design Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Davies G, Whelan S, Foley A, & Walsh MM (2010) Gifts and gifting. International Journal of Management Reviews 12 (4):413-434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00271.x.
Gunawijaya R (2017) Kebutuhan manusia dalam pandangan ekonomi kapitalis dan ekonomi Islam.Al-Maslahah 13 (1):131-150.
Hann C (2006) The gift and reciprocity: Perspectives from economic antropology. In: Kolm S & Ythier JM (eds). Handbook on the Economics of Giving, Reciprocity, and Altruism 1 (4):207-223.
Hasan M & Azis M (2018) Pembangunan Ekonomi dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat: Strategi Pembangunan Manusia dalam Perspektif Ekonomi Lokal. Makassar: CV Nur Lina & Pustaka Taman Ilmu.
Heins VM, Unrau C, & Avram K (2018) Gift-giving and reciprocity in global society: Introducing Marcel Mauss in International studies. Journal of International Political Theory 14 (2):126-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1755088218757807.
Hudayana B (1991) Konsep resiprositas dalam antropologi ekonomi. Jurnal Humaniora 3:20-34.
Kamarusdiana (2019) Studi etnografi dalam kerangka masyarakat dan budaya (community and culture framework in etnographic studies). Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i 6 (2):113-128. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v6i2.10975.
Kartono K (1992) Psikologi Wanita: Mengenal Manita sebagai Ibu dan Nenek. Bandung: CV Mandar Maju.
KBBIonline (2020) Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Online 2012-2019 Versi 2.8. Hak Cipta Pusat Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa (Pusat Bahasa). [Accessed 05 October 2020]. https://kbbi.web.id/sawer.
Koeswinarno (2015) Memahami etnografi ala Spradley. Jurnal SMaRT 1 (2):257-265.
Lestari S (2014) The tradition to donate among woman in Javanese rural areas: Reciprocity, food exchange and monetization. Journal International of Sociology and Anthropology 6 (7):205-213.
Lestari S, Sumarti T, Pandjaitan NK, & Tjondronegoro SMP (2012) Potret resiprositas dalam "tradisi nyumbang” di pedesaan Jawa di tengah monetasi desa. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik 25 (4):271-281.
Malinowski B (1922) Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagos of Melanesian New Guinea. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Mauss M (1990) The Gitf; Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. London: Routledge.
Mauss M (1992) Pemberian: Bentuk dan Fungsi Pertukaran di Masyarakat Kuno (Terjemahan). Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Meera S & Kumar DC (2015) Reciprocity, exchange, and social solidarity. International Research Journal and Social Science 4 (5):84-88.
Miller JG, Goyal N, & Wice M (2017) A cultural psychology of agency: Morality, motivation, and reciprocity. Association for Psychological Science 12 (5):867-875.
Mohlis (2019) Tradisi "Bubuh”; membalas amplop nikahan di Madura. Mata Madura: Media Pencerah Mengedepankan Solusi. [Accessed 06 October 2020]. https://matamaduranews.com/tradisi-bubuh-membalas-amplop-nikahan-di-madura/.
Mughal MAZ (2018) Exchange relationship and social change in rural Pakistan: Rituals and ceremonies of childbirth, marriage and death. South Asia Research 38 (2):177-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0262728018768137.
Niederle A & Radomsky GFW (2008) Social actors, markets and reciprocity: Convergences between the new economic sociology and the "paradigm of the gift”. Teoria & Sociedade 15 (1):146-177.
Rachmahani H (2015) Gift-giving behavior pada generasi millennials di Indonesia, perspektif pembawa hadiah. Thesis, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya.
Rahadiyan I (2019) Pemaknaan dan penerapan prinsip resiprositas berdasarkan ASEAN Banking Integration Framework. IUS Quia Iustum Law Journal of Islamic University of Indonesia 26 (3):545-564.
Rochana T (2012) Orang Madura, suatu tinjauan antropologis. Jurnal Humanus 11 (1):46-51. https://doi.org/10.24036/jh.v11i1.622.
Sari SW (2016) Perkembangan pemikiran uang dari masa ke masa. Jurnal An-Nisbah 3 (1):39-58. https://doi.org/10.21274/an.2016.3.1.39-58.
Setiawan R (2013) Solidaritas mekanik ke solidaritas organik (suatu ulasan singkat pemikiran Emile Durkheim). Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji 259-266.
Shaw A, Barakzai A, & Keysar B (2019) When and why people evaluate negative reciprocity as more fair than positive reciprocity. Cognitive Science A Multidicipline Journal 43 (8):1-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12773.
Shonhaji (2017) Keterlibatan perempuan dalam mewujudkan keserasian sosial pada masyarakat multiteknik di Lampung. Jurnal TAPIs 14 (1):17-44. https://dx.doi.org/10.24042/tps.v13i1.1397.
Utami IWP (2015) Monetasi dan perubahan sosial ekonomi masyarakat Jawa abad XIX. Jurnal Sejarah dan Budaya 9 (1):51-63.
Wahidmurni (2017) Pemaparan metode penelitian kualitatif. Metodologi Penelitian, Jurusan Pendidikan Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, Semester Ganjil 2017/2018. (Unpublished) [Accessed 27 December 2020]. http://repository.uin-malang.ac.id/1984/2/1984.pdf.
Widhyharto DS (2015) Perempuan sebagai agen sosial-ekonomi masyarakat pesisir sekitar PLTH (Pembangkit Listrik Tenaga Hybrid) Pantai Baru, Kabupaten Bantul, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Indonesian Journal of Community Engagement 1 (1):156-171.
Wulandari P & Irwansyah I (2020) Warga Madura di Kota Makassar: Studi antara solidaritas sosial mekanik dan solidaritas sosial organik warga Madura dalam wadah PERKIM Kota Makassar. Jurnal Predestination: Journal of Society and Culture 1 (1):9-14. https://doi.org/10.26858/prd.v1i1.14984.
Copyright of this journal is possession of Editorial Board and Journal Manager, by the knowledge of the author, while the moral right of the publication belongs to the author.
The formal legal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA), implies that publication can be used for non-commercial purposes in its original form (cannot be modified).
Every publication (printed/electronic) are open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.