Exploring the roots of local government corruption practices in rural Java: An anthropological analysis
Downloads
Corruption is a crucial issue in Indonesia, including in the administration of village government. This article aims to explain the roots of corruption seen from an anthropological analysis of corruption. This article describes the factors causing corruption practices in rural Java, i.e., local values in village governance practices. The research was conducted in several villages in Bojonegoro Regency-East Java. The data were collected through a series of participatory observations, in-depth interviews, and searching archives. The informants were divided into three groups, i.e., the village officials, the elite groups who were against the village head, and the neutral group. The findings of this study indicate that the root of corruption in the village is caused by strong local values such as loyalty to the village head from his followers, solid harmony, and the ability for the village head to manifest himself as an ideal leadership. Such values make relational models that are full of pleasantries for the sake of themselves and their groups to perpetuate power. This study concludes that non-values factors that further complicate the financial administration system in the form of supralocal interventions had a wider impact on the worsening of the deviation in budget usage.
Agustina E (2019) The role of community empowerment carried out by village government in the regional autonomy era. UNIFIKASI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 6 (1):34. https://doi.org/10.25134/unifikasi.v6i1.1483.
Ainillah SR (2016) Elite politik dalam kontenstasi di desa dengan menggunakan studi peran blater dalam pilkades di Desa Banjar, Galis, Bangkalan Madura. Jurnal Politik Muda 5 (3):282-290.
Anggariani D (2013) Politik kekerabatan. Jurnal Politik Profetik 2 (2):1-8.
Aniago E (2017) Polemics of Nigeria's socio-political realities and Chinua Achebe's the trouble with Nigeria. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities 9 (4):25-36. https://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v9n4.04.
Antlöv H (2003) Village government and rural development in Indonesia: The new democratic framework. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 39 (2):193-214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074910302013.
Antlöv H, Wetterberg A, & Dharmawan L (2016) Village governance, community life, and the 2014 village law in Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 52 (2):161-183. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2015.1129047.
Baez-Camargo C, Bukuluki P, Sambaiga R, Gatwa T, Kassa S, & Stahl C (2020) Petty corruption in the public sector: A comparative study of three East African countries through a behavioural lens. African Studies 79 (2):232-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/00020184.2020.1803729.
Bebbington A, Dharmawan L, Fahmi E, & Guggenheim S (2006) Local capacity, village governance, and the political economy of rural development in Indonesia. World Development 34 (11):1958-1976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2005.11.025.
Bourdieu P & Nice R (ed) (1977) Structures, Habitus, Power: Basis for a Theory of Symbolic Power. In: Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511812507.006.
Cahyono H (2015) Konflik elite politik di pedesaan: Relasi antara Badan Perwakilan Desa dan pemerintah desa. Jurnal Penelitian Politik Jurnal Penelitian Politik 2 (1):73-84.
Chalik A (2017) Pertarungan Elite dalam Politik Lokal. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Chasanah IN (2014) Migrasi simbolik wacana kuasa tubuh: Menguak wacana tubuh dalam Ode untuk Leopold Von Sacher-Masoch karya Dinar Rahayu. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik 27 (4):184-194. https://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.v27i42014.184-194.
Closser S (2020) The corruption game: Health systems, international agencies, and the state in South Asia. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 34 (2):268-285. https://doi.org/10.1111/maq.12549.
Corbridge S & Kumar S (2002) Community, corruption, landscape: Tales from the tree trade. Political Geography 21 (6):765-788. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(02)00029-X.
Danso S & Asmorowati S (2020) The shift towards democratic governance: System change versus regime change analysis in The Gambia 2017-2019. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik 33 (4):339-351. https://doi.org/10.20473/mkp.v33i42020.339-351.
Dobel JP (1978) The corruption of a state. American Political Science Review 72 (3):958-973.
Dwiyanto A (2006) Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Pelayanan Publik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Emara AM (2020) The impact of corruption on human development in Egypt. Asian Economic and Financial Review 10 (5):574-589. https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.aefr.2020.105.574.589.
Gabriel FO (2008) A culture of corruption: Everyday deception and popular discontent in Nigeria by Daniel Jordan Smith. American Anthropologist 110 (1):145-146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1433.2008.00018_72.x.
Granovetter M & Swedberg R (ed) (2018) The Sociology of Economic Life (3rd ed). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494338.
Graycar A & Jancsics D (2017) Gift giving and corruption. International Journal of Public Administration 40 (12):1013-1023. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2016.1177833.
Guritno T (2021) ICW: Perangkat desa dominasi terdakwa kasus korupsi, dana desa perlu diawasi ketat. Kompas.com, 22 March. [Accessed 21 August 2021]. https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2021/03/22/18093371/icw-perangkat-desa-dominasi-terdakwa-kasus-korupsi-dana-desa-perlu-diawasi?page=all.
Harrison E (2006) Unpacking the anti-corruption agenda: Dilemmas for anthropologists. Oxford Development Studies 34 (1):15–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810500495915.
Haryanto (2017) Elit, Massa, dan Kekuasaan: Suatu Bahasan Pengantar. Yogyakarta: PolGov. https://polgov.fisipol.ugm.ac.id/f/810/elit-massa-dan-kekuasaan-haryanto.
Henderson JV & Kuncoro A (2004) Corruption in Indonesia. In NBER Working Paper Series 10764 (August).
Hidayat N & Maros A (2019) Hambatan dan upaya Badan Permusyawaratan Desa dalam menyalurkan aspirasi masyarakat melalui penyusunan rencana kerja pemerintah desa (studi pada Dusun Teluk Panjang, Kecamatan Bathin III, Kabupaten Bungo). Seminar Nasional Sains, Teknologi, dan Sosial Humaniora UIT 2019.
Hofstede G (1980) Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
ICW (2000) Controlling Corruption: A Parliamentarian's Handbook. Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW).
Ito T (2006) The dynamics of local governance reform in decentralizing Indonesia: Participatory planning and village empowerment in Bandung, West Java. Asian and African Area Studies 5 (2):137-183.
Kurrohman T (2015) Accountability of planning on village fund allocation in Osing community in Banyuwangi. International Conference on Accounting Studies (ICAS) (August), 319-324.
Latief MS (2000) Persaingan Calon Kepala Desa di Jawa. Yogyakarta: Media Pressindo.
Lewis BD (2015) Decentralising to villages in Indonesia: Money (and other) mistakes. Public Administration and Development 35 (December):347-359. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.1741.
Lucas A (2016) Elite capture and corruption in two villages in Bengkulu Province, Sumatra. Human Ecology 44 (3):287-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-016-9837-6.
Mulyono SP (2014) Sinergitas penyelenggaraan pemerintahan desa pasca pemberlakuan UU No. 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa. Masalah-Masalah Hukum 43 (3):438-444.
Nordholt NS (1987) Kepemimpinan Lokal dalam Pembangunan Pedesaan. Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan.
Nuraini S (2010) Hubungan kekuasaan elit pemerintahan desa. Jurnal Kybernan 1 (1):1-13.
Olken BA (2006) Corruption and the costs of redistribution: Micro evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Public Economics 90 (4-5):853-870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.05.004.
Peluso D (2018) Traversing the margins of corruption amidst informal economies in Amazonia. Culture, Theory and Critique 59 (4):400-418. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2018.1499433.
Pertiwi K & Ainsworth S (2020) Democracy is the cure? Evolving constructions of corruption in Indonesia 1994–2014. Journal of Business Ethics 2005:1995-2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04560-y.
Phahlevy RR (2016) The concept of village autonomy in Indonesia (Indonesian constitution perspective). Rechtsidee 3 (1):27-40. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v3i1.151.
Phahlevy RR & Multazam MT (2018) The shifting of village autonomy concept in Indonesia. Opcion 34 (85):2865-2885.
Platteau JP & Gaspart F (2003) The risk of resource misappropriation in community-driven development. World Development 31 (10):1687-1703. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00138-4.
Prabowo HY & Cooper K (2016) Re-understanding corruption in the Indonesian public sector through three behavioral lenses. Journal of Financial Crime 23 (4):1028-1062. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-08-2015-0039.
Prasetyo PS (2005) Democracy in the Indonesian Village Society: The Impact of Local Autonomy Policy and the Role of Local Culture Toward Democratization in Village Society. UK and USA: Transaction Publishers.
PSKK UGM (2016) Penyusunan Peta Perubahan Sosial di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta: UGM.
Puspasari N (2016) Fraud Theory Evolution and its relevance to fraud prevention in the village government in Indonesia. Asia Pacific Fraud Journal 1 (2):177-188. https://doi.org/10.21532/apfj.001.16.01.02.15.
Rinaldi T, Purnomo M, & Damayanti D (2007) Fighting corruption in decentralised Indonesia: Case studies on handling local government corruption. [Accessed 01 August 2021]. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.573.7836&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Romli O & Nurlia E (2017) Lemahnya Badan Permusyawaratan Desa (BPD) dalam melaksanakan fungsi pemerintahan desa (studi Desa Tegalwangi Kecamatan Menes Kabupaten Pandeglang). CosmoGov 3 (1):36-54. https://doi.org/10.24198/cosmogov.v3i1.12635.
Roth DF & Wilson FL (1980) The Comparative Study of Politics. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Rose-Ackerman S (1999) Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Saputri M (2018) Jokowi perintahkan laporan dana desa harus ringkas tapi bisa dicek. Tirto.id, 23 November. [Accessed 01 August 2021]. https://tirto.id/jokowi-perintahkan-laporan-dana-desa-harus-ringkas-tapi-bisa-dicek-danY.
Sembiring R, Herlinda E, & Ningsih S (2017) Implementation of autonomy area through the implementation of village authority. International Journal of Economic Perspectives 11 (3):5-11.
Å kolník M (2020) The effects of corruption on various forms of political participation in Colombia. Latin American Policy 11 (1):88-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/lamp.12180.
SlijepÄević S, Rajh E, & Budak J (2020) Determinants of corruption pressures on local government in the E.U. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istrazivanja 33 (1):3492-3508. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2020.1774793.
Smith TM (1971) Corruption, tradition and change. Indonesia 11 (11):21-40.
Soeharjono HI (2011) Pengaruh budaya birokrasi "ewuh pakewuh” terhadap efektivitas sistem pengendalian intern. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi 8 (3):243-260.
Suacana IWG, Rukmawati D, & Wiratmaja N (2016) Democracy and autornomy transformation in the governance of Mengwi Village, Province Bali Indonesia in the transition era. Academic Research International 7 (1):241-258.
To PX, Mahanty S, & Dressler W (2014) Social networks of corruption in the Vietnamese and Lao cross-border timber trade. Anthropological Forum 24 (2):154-174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2014.893505.
Torsello D (ed) (2016) Introduction: The Anthropology of Corruption. In Corruption in Public Administration: An Ethnographic Approach. Cheltenham, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing. 1-22. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781785362590.
Tunggal IS & Tunggal AW (2000) Audit Kecurangan dan Akuntansi Forensik. Jakarta: Harvarindo.
Tyson A (2011) Being special, becoming indigenous: Dilemmas of special adat rights in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Social Science 39 (5):652-673. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853111X608339.
Ulfah I, Afala LO, & Rahman F (2019) Corruption and problem of public accountability in village governance. BSPACE, 26-28 November, Malang, East Java, Indonesia. Malang: Proceedings of the First Brawijaya International Conference on Social and Political Sciences. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.26-11-2019.2295150.
Urinboyev R & Svensson M (2013) Living law, legal pluralism, and corruption in Post-Soviet Uzbekistan. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 45 (3):372-390. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2014.867752.
Vel JAC & Bedner AW (2015) Decentralisation and village governance in Indonesia: The return to the nagari and the 2014 village law. Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 47 (3):493-507. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2015.1109379.
Wahyudi A, Sartika D, Wismono FH, Ramdhani, LE, Rosalina L, Kusumaningrum M, & Zakiyah S (2020) Investigating organizational and human resource capacity of village government: A case study in Kutai Kartanegara Regency. Policy & Governance Review 4 (2):99-115. https://doi.org/10.30589/pgr.v4i2.267.
Wahyudi I (2007) Memahami Kebijakan Publik & Strategi Advokasi Sebuah Panduan Praktis. Malang: In-TRANS Publishing.
Wang Y (2020) A network-exchange approach to corruption: Brokers and institution spanning in a Chinese corruption network. Deviant Behavior 41 (12):1636-1649. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2019.1640525.
Widagdo AK, Widodo A, & Ismail M (2016) Sistem akuntansi pengelolaan dana desa. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis 19 (2):323-340. https://doi.org/10.24914/jeb.v19i2.336.
Wirasandi (2018) Konflik kontestasi aktor intra desa: Buah demokrasi minus transformasi. Jurnal Ilmiah Rinjani 6 (1):45-55.
Woodhouse AF (2005) Village Corruption in Indonesia: Fighting Corruption in the World Bank's Development Program. Indonesian Social Development Paper No. 6. Jakarta: World Bank Office.
Copyright of this journal is possession of Editorial Board and Journal Manager, by the knowledge of the author, while the moral right of the publication belongs to the author.
The formal legal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA), implies that publication can be used for non-commercial purposes in its original form (cannot be modified).
Every publication (printed/electronic) are open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.
