Challenges and problems in the recruitment of ad hoc workers of election management body at the local level: Evidence from Banyumas
The prevailing national regulation on the recruitment of PPK, PPS, and KPPS staff sets forth that those temporary officers can be of service for only two periods of general election and cannot be involved afterwards. This regulation actually has positive aspect, but is not easy in its implementation. This article aims at examining the challenges and problems faced by the election management body at local level (Regency KPU) in preparing the human resource of ad hoc staff for the 2019 general election in Indonesia. This article was based on a qualitative research conducted in 2020 in Banyumas Regency, Central Java. This article shows that challenges that had to be faced by Regency KPU in the recruitment of ad hoc employees were the duration of screening and the way village leaders socialized the information regarding the recruitment. Whereas, the involvement of young generation and women as general election ad hoc workers in Banyumas was still low because of a number of factors, from know-how of general election to having lack information of the recruitment. This study concludes that actor’s action choice is limited by a number of matters, such as the path previously taken, rules regulating the agency, and social-political context.
Aspinall E (2010) Indonesia: the irony of success. Journal of Democracy 21 (2):20-34.
Aspinall E (2015) Oligarchic populism: Prabowo Subianto’s challenge to Indonesian democracy. Indonesia (99):1-28. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5728/indonesia.99.0001.
Aspinall E & Mietzner M (2019) Southeast Asia’s troubling elections: Nondemocratic pluralism in Indonesia. Journal of Democracy 30 (4):104-118. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0055.
Aspinall E, Fossati D, Muhtadi B, & Warburton E (2020) Elites, masses, and democratic decline in Indonesia. Democratization 27 (4):505-526. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2019.1680971.
Bland G, Green A, & Moore T (2013) Measuring the quality of election administration. Democratization 20 (2): 358-377. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.651352.
Dahl RA (1998) On democracy. New Haven & London: Yale university press.
Fealy G (2011) Indonesian politics in 2011: democratic regression and Yudhoyono’s regal incumbency. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 47 (3):333-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2011.619050.
Hadiz VR (2017) Indonesia’s year of democratic setbacks: Towards a new phase of deepening illiberalism?. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 53 (3):261-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2017.1410311.
Hadiz VR & Robison R (2017) Competing populisms in post-authoritarian Indonesia. International Political Science Review 38 (4):488-502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512117697475.
Hadiz VR (2018) Imagine all the people? Mobilising Islamic populism for right-wing politics in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia 48 (4):566-583. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2018.1433225.
International IDEA (2012) Manajemen Kepemiluan Selama Masa Transisi. Tantangan dan Peluang [Election Management during the Transition Time, Challenges and Opportunities]. Stromsborg: International IDEA.
James TS (2019) Better workers, better elections? Electoral management body workforces and electoral integrity worldwide. International Political Science Review 40 (3):370-390. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512119829516.
James TS, Garnett HA, Loeber L, & Van Ham C (2019) Electoral management and the organisational determinants of electoral integrity: Introduction. International Political Science Review 40 (3):295-312. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512119828206.
Kimball DC & Kropf M (2006) The Street‐Level Bureaucrats of Elections: Selection Methods for Local Election Officials. Review of Policy Research 23 (6):1257-1268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00258.x.
Liddle RW & Mujani S (2013) Indonesian Democracy: From Transition to Consolidation. In: Künkler M & Stepan A (ed). Democracy and Islam in Indonesia. New York: Columbia University Press.
Linz JJ & Stepan A (1996) Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. Baltimore: JHU Press.
López-Pintor R (2000) Electoral management bodies as institutions of governance. New York: Bureau for Development Policy UNDP.
Lowndes V & Roberts M (2013) Why institutions matter: The new institutionalism in political science. Macmillan International Higher Education. New Delhi: Red Globe Press.
Mietzner M (2012) Indonesia’s democratic stagnation: anti-reformist elites and resilient civil society. Democratization 19 (2):209-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2011.572620.
Mietzner M (2018) Fighting illiberalism with illiberalism: Islamist populism and democratic deconsolidation in Indonesia. Pacific Affairs 91 (2):261-282. https://doi.org/10.5509/2018912261.
Mietzner M (2020) Rival populisms and the democratic crisis in Indonesia: chauvinists, Islamists and technocrats. Australian Journal of International Affairs 74 (4):1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2020.1725426.
Miles MB, Huberman AM, & Saldaña J (2014) Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. 3rd. London: Sage publication.
Norris P (2019) Conclusions: The new research agenda on electoral management. International Political Science Review 40 (3):391-403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512119829869.
Perdana A, Silitonga BM, Liando FDM, Rizkiyansyah FK, Nugroho K, Sukmajati M, Tanthowi PU, & Anggraini T (2019) Tata Kelola Pemilu di Indonesia. Jakarta: Komisi Pemilihan Umum Republik Indonesia.
Pastor RA (1999) The role of electoral administration in democratic transitions: Implications for policy and research. Democratization 6 (4):1-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510349908403630.
Power T & Warburton E (ed) (2020) Democracy in Indonesia: From Stagnation to Regression? Heng Mui Keng Terrace: ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.
Rakhmani I & Saraswati MS (2021) Authoritarian Populism in Indonesia: The Role of the Political Campaign Industry in Engineering Consent and Coercion. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 40 (3):436-460. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034211027885.
Sulastri E & Handayani N (2017) Pola Rekrutmen Penyelenggara Pemilu Tingkat PPS Dan KPPS Untuk Pemilu Yang Berintegritas. KAJIAN 28 (1):1-11.
Wall A, Ellis A, Ayoub A, Dundas CW, Rukambe J, & Staino S (2016) Desain Penyelenggara Pemilu: Buku Pedoman Internasional IDEA. Stromsborg: Internasional IDEA.
Warburton E & Aspinall E (2019) Explaining Indonesia’s democratic regression. Contemporary Southeast Asia 41 (2):255-285. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs41-2k.
Copyright (c) 2022 Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright of this journal is possession of Editorial Board and Journal Manager, by the knowledge of the author, while the moral right of the publication belongs to the author.
The formal legal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA), implies that publication can be used for non-commercial purposes in its original form (cannot be modified).
Every publication (printed/electronic) are open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.