Interest as a mode of reality: Answering the crisis of digital society
Downloads
Currently, society is entering a new crisis in the historical phase of society namely post-truth reality. The crisis arises when the mixing of real and fake information is reproduced through social media by the digital actors. It has put new problems of social analysis particularly to understand the meaning and direction of social actions. This article aims at answering the crisis of the digital society with the elaboration of theoretical discourse of interest. Social scientists from various schools have placed interest as the basic concept to analyze social life. However, the sociological elaboration of the theory of interest stops among the great edifices of all schools of social theory. Therefore, this article is a proposal for developing a theory of interest to track the mode of reality, particularly in the digital society. The research method of this study is an eclectic literature review of interest theories and participative observation in Indonesia's digital society during 2019-2021. This study finds that digital actors produce and reproduce symbolic language on social media by confounding true and false information or post-truth in the dynamics of the COVID-19 pandemic policy. The symbolic language of digital actors does not only mean violating the rules in a digital society, but also expresses certain social interests including certain needs or aspirations.
Arifin NF & Fuad AJ (2020) Dampak post-truth di media sosial. Jurnal Intelektual: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Studi Keislaman 10 (3):376-378. https://doi.org/10.33367/ji.v10i3.1430.
Baggini J (2017) A Short History of Truth: Consolations for a Post-Truth World. London: Quercus Editions.
Ball J (2017) Post-Truth: How Bullshit Conquered the World. Marina: Biteback Publishing.
Barbalet J (2012) Self Interest and theory of action. The British Journal of Sociology 63 (3):412-429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2012.01417.x.
Baudrillard J (1990) Seduction. Canada: New World Perspective.
Berger PL & Luckman T (1991) Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise to Sociology of Knowledge. London: Penguin Books.
Bourdieu P (1992) An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Campbell T (1994) Tujuh Teori Sosial. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Castells M (2010) The Rise of the Network Society. West Sussex: Blackwell Publissing.
Chinn CA, Barzilai S, & Duncan RG (2021) Education for a "Post-Truth” World: New Directions for Research and Practice. Educational Researcher 50 (1) 51-60. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20940683.
Chun WHK (2005) Introduction: Did Somebody Say New Media? In: Chun WHK, Fisher AW, & Keenan T (ed). New Media Old Media: A History and Theory Reader. New York: Routledge.
Coleman J (1990) The Foundation of Social Theory. London: Harvard University Press.
Coser L (1956) The Social Functions of Conflict. New York: Free Press.
Dahrendorf R (1959) Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society. London: Routledge.
Das R & Ahmed W (2022) Rethinking fake news: Disinformation and ideology during the time of COVID-19 global pandemic. IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review 11 (1):146-159. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F22779752211027382.
Etymonline [Diakses 3 Juli 2021]. https://www.etymonline.com/word/interest.
Foucault M (1980) Power/Knowledge: Selected Interview and Other Writings 1972-1977. New York: Pantheon Books.
Giddens A (1971) Capitalism & Modern Social Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Giddens A (1984) The Constitution of Society: Outline of The Structuration Theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas J (1984) Theory of Communicative Action, Volume One: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston: Beacon Press.
Harackiewicz JM & Knogler M (2017) Interest: Theory and Application. In: Elliot AJ, Dweck CS & Yeager DS (ed). Handbook of Competence and Motivation: Theory and Application. New York: The Guilford Press.
Hardiman BF (2009) Kritik Ideologi: Menyingkap Pertautan Pengetahuan dan Kepentingan Bersama. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Herman E & Chomsky N (2008) Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of Media. London: The Bodley Head.
Keyes R (2004) The Post-Truth Era: Dishonesty and Deception in Contemporary Life. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Kominfo.go.id (2019) Kominfo temukan 3.356 hoaks, terbanyak saat Pemilu 2019. Kominfo, 10 January. [Accessed 3 July 2021]. https://kominfo.go.id/content/detail/21876/kominfo-temukan-3356-hoaks-terbanyak-saat-pemilu-2019/0/berita_satker.
Langton N, Robbins SP & Judge TA (2016) Organizational Behaviour: Concept, Controversies, Application. Toronto: Pearson.
Lim XJ, Radzol AM, Cheah J, & Wong MW (2019) The impact of social media influencers on purchase intention and the mediation effect of customer attitude. Asian Journal of Business Research 7 (2):19-36. https://doi.org/10.14707/ajbr.170035.
Lupton D (2015) Digital Sociology. New York: Routlegde.
Malcolm D (2021) Post-truth society? An eliasian sociological knowledge in the 21st century. Sociology 55 (6):1063-1079. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0038038521994039.
Manheim K (1955) Ideology and Utopia: An Introduction to the Sociology of Knowledge. Wirth L & Shils E (Trans). New York: Harcourt, Brace.
Mcintyre L (2018) Post-Truth. Massachusetts: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Mofferz MW (2020) Meretas makna post-truth: Analisis kontekstual hoaks, emosi sosial, dan populisme agama. Societas Dei: Jurnal Agama Dan Masyarakat 7 (1):3-34. https://doi.org/10.33550/sd.v7i1.141.
Muqsith MA & Pratomo RR (2021) The development of fake news in the post-truth age. Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i 8 (5):1391-1406.
Ramsbotham O, Miall H, & Woodhouse T (2011) Contemporary Conflict Resolution. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Ritzer G (2008) Sociological Theory. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies.
Rokom (2021) Survei tunjukkan mayoritas masyarakat Indonesia bersedia menerima vaksin COVID-19. Berita 11 November. Kemenkes.go.id, 19 January. [Accessed 7 Jule 2021]. https://sehatnegeriku.kemkes.go.id/baca/umum/20201117/4935712/survei-tunjukkan-mayoritas-masyarakat-indonesia-bersedia-menerima-vaksin-covid-19-2/.
Rules JB (1992) Theories of Civil Violence. California: University of California Press.
Salim HJ (2021) Video hoaks sepekan: Kejang akibat disuntik vaksin COVID-19 hingga apel persiapan lockdown Jakarta. Liputan 6, 28 June [Accessed 2 July 2021]. https://www.liputan6.com/cek-fakta/read/4593536/video-hoaks-sepekan-kejang-akibat-disuntik-vaksin-covid-19-hingga-apel-persiapan-lockdown-jakarta.
Salman, Saputra DH, & Wardana RW (2019) Media sosial dan masyarakat baru di post truth era. Kalbisocio: Jurnal Bisnis dan Komunikasi 6 (2):136-140.
Shelton T (2020) A post-truth pandemic? Big Data & Society 7 (2). https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2053951720965612.
Sumarti T (2007) Sosiologi kepentingan (Interest) dalam tindakan ekonomi. Sodality: Jurnal Transdisiplin Sosiologi, Komunikasi, dan Ekologi Manusia Agustus 1 (2):283-293. https://doi.org/10.22500/sodality.v1i2.5925.
Susan N (2019) Sosiologi Konflik: Teori-Teori dan Analisis. Jakarta: Penerbit Kencana.
Swedberg R (2005a) Interest. New York: Open.up.uk.
Swedberg R (2005b) Can there be a sociological concept of interest? Theory and society 34 (4):359-390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-005-1986-3.
Weber M (1978) Economy and Society: An Outline to Interpretive Sociology. London: University of California Press.
Wielki J (2020) Analysis of the role of digital influencers and their impact on the functioning of the contemporary on-line promotional system and its sustainable development. Sustainability 12 (17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177138.
Yusuf (2020) Kominfo temukan 1.401 sebaran isu hoaks terkait COVID-19. Kominfo, 7 May. [Accessed 5 July 2021]. https://aptika.kominfo.go.id/2020/05/kominfo-temukan-1-401-sebaran-isu-hoaks-terkait-covid-19/.
Copyright (c) 2023 Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright of this journal is possession of Editorial Board and Journal Manager, by the knowledge of the author, while the moral right of the publication belongs to the author.
The formal legal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA), implies that publication can be used for non-commercial purposes in its original form (cannot be modified).
Every publication (printed/electronic) are open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.