Flypaper effects of Central Transfers on the spending behaviour of Ghana's central region local governments: Does status matter?
Downloads
Fiscal system incentivises local government officials to depend on central government's transfers to fund their budgets. This paper examines whether district and municipal status local government officials exhibit the same spending behaviour when presented with central government's transfers. The paper uses the panel data model to estimate the flypaper effect on district and municipal status local governments in the Central Region of Ghana from 2008 to 2015. The result shows differences in spending behaviour between district and municipal status local governments, where the flypaper effect is more pronounced on municipal status local governments (52.6%) than district status local governments (44.8%). Though municipal local governments are financially better in raising own-source revenues compared to the district local governments, the design of the fiscal system tends to make municipal local governments more reliant on central transfers than on expenditure of own-source revenues. This reduces interest in raising own-source revenue and its expenditure, a situation which has an adverse long-term impact on decentralisation in terms of citizen empowerment and participation. The study recommends an optimal level of central transfers which will serve the purpose of correcting vertical and horizontal imbalances, as in theory, and at the same time promote the ideals of decentralisation (citizen empowerment and participation).
Acar Y (2019) Does flypaper effect exist? New evidence from Turkish municipalities. Sosyoekonomi 27 (39):55-68. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2019.01.03.
Ambrosiano MF & Bordignon M (2006) Normative Versus Positive Theories of Revenue Assignments in Federations. In: Brosio G & Ahmad E (ed). Handbook of Fiscal Federalism, chapter 12. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847201515.00021.
Banful AB (2007) Can Institutions Reduce Clientelism? A Study of the District Assemblies Common Fund in Ghana. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
Bergvall D, Charbit C, Kraan D, & Merk O (2006) Intergovernmental transfers and decentralised public spending. OECD Network on Fiscal Relations Across Levels of Government, Working Paper No 3.
Bossuyt J & Gould J (2007) Decentralisation and poverty reduction: Elaborating the linkages. European Centre for Development Policy Management. Policy Management Brief 12.
Bradford DF & Oates W (1971) Towards a predictive theory of intergovernmental grants. The American Economic Review 61 (2):440-448.
Brosio G & Ahmad E (2008) Local service provision in selected OECD countries: Do decentralized operations work better? IMF Working Paper No. 08/67. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1112209.
Canavire-Bacarreza G & Espinoza NGZ (2010) Fiscal transfers a curse or blessing? Evidence of their effect on tax effort for municipalities in Sinaloa, Mexico. International Studies Program Working Paper 10, Georgia State University, Atlanta.
Cárdenas OJ & Sharma A (2011) Mexican municipalities and the flypaper effect. Public Budgeting & Finance 31 (3):73-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5850.2011.00990.x.
Crook RC (2003) Decentralisation and poverty reduction in Africa: The politics of local–central relations. Public Administration and Development: The International Journal of Management Research and Practice 23 (1):77-88. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.261.
Dick-Sagoe C (2013) Performance and challenges of internally generated revenue mobilisation of the Abura-Asebu-Kwamankese district assembly for local level development. Dissertation, University of Cape Coast, Ghana.
Dick-Sagoe C (2017) Towards quality service delivery outcomes: What can local governments' ownsource revenue do? Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Public Administration and Development Alternatives in Gaborone, Botswana (26-28 July 2017). In: MP Sebola and JP Tsheola (ed). The Independence of African States in the Age of Globalisation. University of Limpopo publication, South Africa, pages 223-228.
Dick-Sagoe C (2020) Decentralization for improving the provision of public services in developing countries: A critical review. Cogent Economics & Finance 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2020.1804036.
Dick-Sagoe C, Asare-Nuamah P, & Dick-Sagoe AD (2021) Public choice and decentralised healthcare service delivery in Lesotho: Assessing improvement and efficiency in service delivery. Cogent Social Sciences 7 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1969737.
Dick-Sagoe C & Tingum EN (2021) Flypaper effect of intergovernmental transfers and incentives to improve own-source revenue mobilization of local governments in the central region of Ghana. Open Journal of Social Sciences 9 (8):434-447. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2021.98030.
Elhiraika AB (2007) Fiscal decentralisation and public service delivery in South Africa. ATPC Work in Progress No. 58. A paper was presented at a workshop on "Public expenditure and service delivery in Africa: Managing public expenditure to improve service quality and access” organized by ECA from 11-13 October 2006, Lusaka, Zambia.
Fiva JH (2006) New evidence on the effect of fiscal decentralization on the size and composition of government spending. FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis 62 (2):250-280.
Fumey A & Egwaikhide FO (2019) Redistributive politics: The case of fiscal transfers in Ghana. International Journal of Social Economics 46 (2):213-225. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-05-2017-0191.
Gamkhar S (2000) Is the response of state and local highway spending symmetric to increases and decreases in federal highway grants? Public Finance Review 28 (1):3-25. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F109114210002800101.
Gaster L (1991) Quality and decentralisation: Are the connected? Policy and Politics 19 (4):257-267. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557391782454142.
Government of Ghana (1992) The national constitution of the Republic of Ghana. Accra-Ghana.
Government of Ghana (1993) Local Government Act of 1993, Act 462. [Accessed 2 April 2022]. https://lgs.gov.gh/index.php/law-acts-legislative-instrument/.
Government of Ghana (2016) Local Governance Act, 2016, Act 936. [Accessed 2 April 2022]. https://lgs.gov.gh/index.php/law-acts-legislative-instrument/.
Greene WWH (2012) Econometric analysis 7th Ed. Hoboken: Prentice Hall.
Grisorio MJ & Prota F (2015) The impact of fiscal decentralization on the composition of public expenditure: Panel data evidence from Italy. Regional Studies 49 (12):1941-1956. https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.859665.
Hausman JA (2015) Specification tests in econometrics. Applied Econometrics 38 (2):112-134.
Hsiao C (2003) Analysis of panel data, second edition. In: Hsiao C (ed). Analysis of Panel Data, Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511754203.
Inanga EL & Osei-Wusu D (2004) Financial resource base of sub-national governments and fiscal decentralization in Ghana. African Development Review 16 (1):72-114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8268.2004.00085.x.
Jia J, Ding S, & Liu Y (2019) Decentralization, incentives, and local tax enforcement. Journal of Urban Economics 115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2019.103225.
Jin J & Zou H (2002) How does fiscal decentralization affect aggregate, national, and subnational government size? Journal of Urban Economics 52 (2):270-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/S00941190(02)00004-9.
Kang Y & Setyawan D (2012) Intergovernmental transfer and the flypaper effect–evidence from municipalities/regencies in Indonesia. KDI School of Pub Policy & Management Paper.
King R, Azeem VA, Abbey C, Boateng SK, & Mevuta D (2003) Tracking of the district assemblies common fund: A pilot study of four district assemblies.
Kyriacou AP, Muinelo-Gallo L, & Roca-Sagalés O (2015) Fiscal decentralization and regional disparities: The importance of good governance. Papers in Regional Science 94 (1): 89-107. https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12061.
Kyriacou AP, Muinelo-Gallo L, & Roca-Sagalés O (2017) Regional inequalities, fiscal decentralization and government quality. Regional Studies 51 (6):945-957. https://doi.org/10.10 80/00343404.2016. 11509 92.
Levaggi R & Smith PC (2003) Decentralization in Health Care: Lessons from Public Economics. In: Smith PC, Ginnelly L, & Sculpher M (ed). Health Policy and Economics: Opportunities and Challenges. Maidenhead, Berkshire: Open University Press. 223-247.
Martinez-Vazquez J & Yao M (2009) Fiscal decentralization and public sector employment: A Crosscountry analysis. Public Finance Review 37 (5):539-571. https://doi.org/10.1177/1091142109343176.
Min C (2019) Models for Panel Data. In: Min C (ed). Applied Econometrics: A Practical Guide. London: Routledge.
Mogues T & Benin S (2012) Do external grants to district government discourage own revenue generation? A look at local public finance dynamics in Ghana. World Development 40 (5):1054-1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.12.001.
Musau MV, Waititu AG, & Wanjoya AK (2015) Modelling panel data: Comparison of GLS estimation and robust covariance matrix estimation. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics 4 (3):185-191. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20150403.25.
Musgrave R (1959) Public Finance. New York: McGraw Hill.
Oates WE (1972) Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Oates WE (1999) An essay on Fiscal Federalism. Journal of Economic Literature 37 (3):1120-1149.
Oates WE (2005) Toward a second-generation theory of fiscal federalism. International Tax and Public Finance 12 (4):349-373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-005-1619-9.
Owusu-Amponsah V (2017) Effects of the District Assembly Common Fund (DACF) on socioeconomic development in Ghana: A case study of Tano-South District assembly in the Brong Ahafo Region of Ghana. Dissertation, University of Cape Coast, Cape Coast.
Panggabean FY & Dalimunthe MB (2017) Analysis of flypaper effect on the district and municipality government expenditures in North Sumatra province. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Accounting, Business & Economics, Yogyakarta, 26-27 October 2017.
Park J (2022) Fiscal decentralisation and composition of local government expenditure: Evidence from South Korea. Public Finance Review 50 (1):62-90. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F10911421221093142.
Park S & Kim S (2022) Does fiscal decentralization affect local governments' strategic behaviours? Evidence from South Korea. Pacific Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0106.12388.
Pöschl C & Weingast BR (2013) The Fiscal Interest Approach: The Design of Tax and Transfer systems. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.
Rao MG & Singh N (1998) Intergovernmental transfers: Rationale, design and indian experience. Department of Economics, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Robinson M (2007) Does decentralisation improve equity and efficiency in public service delivery provision? IDS Bulletin 38 (1):7-17.
Rodden J (2002) The dilemma of fiscal federalism: Grants and fiscal performance around the world. American Journal of Political Science 46 (3):670-687. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088407.
Rodden J (2016) Decentralized rule and revenue. Paper prepared for United States Agency for International Development (USAID) on the day of June 14, 2016. Stanford University. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5761e0e7d1758ead80bca408/t/576364c1f5e231826f0c96ae/1466131649937/jr_finance_FINAL.pdf.
Sagbas I & Saruc NT (2004) Intergovernmental Transfers and the Flypaper Effect in Turkey. Turkish Studies 5 (2):79-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/1468384042000228602.
Sarquah E (2008) Challenges of fiscal decentralization policy in the Akuapem South District of Ghana. Thesis, The University of Bergen, Bergen.
Schroeder L & Smoke P (2003) Intergovernmental fiscal transfers: Concepts, International practices and Policy Issues. In: Smoke P & Kim Y (ed). Intergovernmental fiscal transfers in Asia: Current practice and challenges for the future 20.
Setyawan D (2011) Intergovernmental transfer in Indonesia and the flypaper effect phenomenon. Thesis, KDI School, Sejong-Si.
Sirenko NM, Baryshevskaya IV, Poltorak AS, & Shyshpanova NO (2018) State and Tendencies of Intergovernmental Regulation in Ukraine in Conditions of Fiscal Decentralization. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice (2):157-164. https://doi.org/10.18 371/fcaptp.v2i25.136489.
SiwinÌska-Gorzelak J, Bukowska G, & Wójcik P (2020) The impact of revenue autonomy on the composition of local public spending: Evidence from Poland. Local Government Studies 46 (4):641-665. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2019.1635017.
Sour L (2013) The flypaper effect in Mexican local governments. Estudios Economicos Vol. 28 (1): 165-186.
Sow M & Razafimahefa IF (2015) Fiscal decentralization and the efficiency of public service delivery. International Monetary Fund.
Tiebout CM (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64 (5). https://doi.org/10.1086/257839.
Wallis JJ & Sylla RE (1994) The Interaction of Taxation and Regulation in Nineteenth-Century U.S. Banking. In The Regulated Economy: A Historical Approach to Political Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 121-144.
Weingast BR (2009) Second generation fiscal federalism: The implications of fiscal incentives. Journal of Urban Economics 65 (3):279-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2008.12.005.
Weingast BR (2014) Second generation fiscal federalism: Political aspects of decentralization and economic development. World Development 53: 14-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.w orlddev. 2013.01.003.
Zigiene G (2012) The importance of functions assignment for the intergovernmental fiscal relations. Journal of Business Management 5 (Special Edition):112-125.
Copyright (c) 2022 Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright of this journal is possession of Editorial Board and Journal Manager, by the knowledge of the author, while the moral right of the publication belongs to the author.
The formal legal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA), implies that publication can be used for non-commercial purposes in its original form (cannot be modified).
Every publication (printed/electronic) are open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.
