Illegal trading in the cross-border of Indonesia and Enclave Oecusse, Timor Leste
Downloads
Cross-border trade wrapped in kinship is the hallmark of residents of the borders of Indonesia and Timor Leste. This study aims to analyze the cross-border trade activities of district Timor Tengah Utara Republic of Indonesia and District Enclave Oecusse, Republik Demokrasi Timor Leste. Research on illegal trade was carried out from January 2019 to December 2021. Throughout the study, the authorities were aware of the illegal trade but there was omission because the profits earned were greater than the legal transactions. The types of illegal trade include: subsidized fuel household furniture clothing, cigarettes, and groceries. A qualitative approach is used to explore the context of the border area and the main phenomena. Opinions, perceptions, and feelings of participants regarding the activities of trade area known as the mouse paths (Jalan Tikus) were obtained through field work and indepth interviews. The results of this study indicate several factors, from an economic perspective, such that it provides many benefits because the currency transactions used are US$; security supervision at the border is not yet tight and maximal; geographical conditions close to residential areas make it easier to smuggle goods into Timor Leste. This study concludes that there is a need to improve supervision of exit gates, entry of people and goods passing through the border entrance and the management of cross-border markets that have been built in support of bilateral cooperation.
Ang CK, Embi MA, & Yunus MM (2016) Enhancing the quality of the findings of a longitudinal case study: Reviewing trustworthiness via ATLAS.ti. The Qualitative Report 21 (10):1855-1867. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol21/iss10/7.
Arslan Z, Can Åž, & Wilson TM (2020) Do border walls work?: Security, insecurity and everyday economy in the Turkish-Syrian borderlands. Turkish Studies 22 (5):744-772. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2020.1841642.
Bovensiepen JM (2015) The Land of Gold: Post-Conflict Recovery and Cultural Revival in Independent Timor Leste. SEAP.
Cohen JH (2011) Problems in the field: Participant observation and the assumption of neutrality. In: Atkinson P & Delamont S (ed). Sage Qualitative Research Methods Volume I: Sage Benchmarks in Social Research Methods. New York: Sage. 273-290.
Creswell JW & Creswell JD (2018) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed). New York: Sage.
Creswell JW & Poth CN (2018) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed). New York: Sage.
Cummins D (2018). Local Governance in Timor-Leste: Lessons in postcolonial state-building. London: Routledge.
DITC (2019) Number of border market traders. Annual Report.
Dzawanda B, Nicolau MD, Matsa M, & Kusena W (2021) Livelihood outcomes of informal cross border traders prior to the rise of the virtual cash economy in Gweru, Zimbabwe. Journal of Borderlands Studies 38 (1):75-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2020.1865187.
Elsing S (2019) Navigating small-scale trade across Thai-Lao border checkpoints: Legitimacy, social relations and money. Journal of Contemporary Asia 49 (2):216-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2018.1551559.
Fadahunsi A & Rosa P (2002) Entrepreneurship and illegality: Insights from the Nigerian crossborder trade. Journal of Business Venturing 17 (5):397-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00073-8.
Flick U (2014) Mapping the field. In: Flick U (ed). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis (1st ed, 5). New York: Sage.
Ghosh S (2019) Chor, police and cattle: The political economies of bovine value in the India–Bangladesh borderlands. South Asia: Journal of South Asia Studies 42 (6):1108-1124. https://doi.org/10.1080/00856401.2019.1672926.
Grillot C (2016) Trust facilitates business, but may also ruin it: The hazardous facets of SinoVietnamese border trade. Asian Anthropology 15 (2):169-185. https://doi.org/10.1080/1683478X.2016.1216281.
Hale G (2019) Borders Near and Far: The Economic, Geographic and Regulatory Contexts for Trade and Border-Related Issues in Landlocked Alberta. Journal of Borderlands Studies 34 (2):157-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2017.1315609.
Hutchison R (2019) Exploring an early cross-border trade system: Norwegian copper in the 18th century. Scandinavian Journal of History 44 (3):261-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/03468755.2018.1509805.
Jorgensen DL (2015) Participant observation. In: Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Hoboken: Wiley. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0247.
Khondoker R (2019) Regulation and Contraband Trade in the Bangladeshi Borderland: Whose Weapons? Journal of Borderlands Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2019.1685400.
Krainara C & Routray JK (2015) Cross-border trades and commerce between Thailand and neighboring countries: Policy implications for establishing special border economic zones. Journal of Borderlands Studies 30 (3):345-363. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2015.1068209.
Leach M (2017) Nation-Building and National Identity in Timor-Leste. London: Routledge.
Little PD, Tiki W, & Debsu DN (2015) Formal or informal, legal or illegal: The ambiguous nature of cross-border livestock trade in the horn of Africa. Journal of Borderlands Studies 30 (3):405-421. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2015.1068206.
Lundahl M & Sjöholm F (2008) The oil resources of Timor-Leste: Curse or blessing? Pacific Review 21 (1):67-86. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512740701868898.
McWilliam A (2020) Post-conflict social and economic recovery in Timor-Leste. In: PostConflict Social and Economic Recovery in Timor-Leste. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429347948.
Medina MC & Ardila Calderón G (2015) The Colombia–ecuador border region: Between informal dynamics and illegal practices. Journal of Borderlands Studies 30 (4):519-535. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2016.1179208.
Miles MB, Huberman AM, & Saldaña J (2018) Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (4th ed). New York: Sage.
Molnar AK (2010) Timor Leste: Politics, History, and Culture. London: Routledge.
í˜degaard CV (2016) Border multiplicities: At the cross-roads between improvisation and regulation in the Andes. Journal of Borderlands Studies 31 (1):23-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2015.1115733.
Patton MQ (2017) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (4th ed). New York: Sage.
Paulus T, Woods M, Atkins DP, & Macklin R (2017). The discourse of QDAS: reporting practices of ATLAS.ti and NVivo users with implications for best practices. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 20 (1):35-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2015.1102454.
Polner M (2015) Customs and illegal trade: Old game - new rules. Journal of Borderlands Studies 30 (3):329-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2015.1066702.
RI-RDTL (2003) Arrangement between the government of the Republic of Indonesia and the government of the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste on traditional border crossings and regulated market. Embassy of the Republic of Indonesia in Dili, Republik Demokrasi Timor Leste. https://kemlu.go.id/dili/id/pages/kekonsuleranpas_lintas_batas_/1762/etc-menu.
Rolandsen í˜H (2019) Trade, peace-building and hybrid governance in the Sudan-South Sudan borderlands. Conflict, Security and Development 19 (1):79-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/14678802.2019.1561628.
Rubin A & Babbie ER (2016) Research Methods for Social Work (9th ed). Boston, Massachusetts: Cengage Learning.
Schofield C & Andi Arsana IM (2019) Settling Timor-Leste's international limits and boundaries. In: Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Timor-Leste. London: Routledge. 283-302. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623177-21.
Scott JW (2019) Border regions. In: The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Urban and Regional Studies. Hoboken: Wiley. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118568446.eurs0027.
Shahriar S (2020) India's Economic Relations with Myanmar: A Study of Border Trade. Journal of Borderlands Studies 37 (3):599-621. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2020.1816202.
Strating R (2014) The Indonesia-Timor-Leste commission of truth and friendship: Enhancing bilateral relations at the expense of justice. Contemporary Southeast Asia 36 (2):232-261. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs36-2c.
Togral Koca B (2019) Local bordering practices, refugees, and civil society: The case of Berlin. Geographical Review 109 (4):544-561. https://doi.org/10.1111/gere.12351.
TOI (2019) Number of State Border Crossers per Month at PLBN in TTU Regency. Annual Report.
UNDP (2020) Human development report 2020. In: The Next Frontier: Human Development and the Anthropocene. http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-report-2020.
van den Boogaard V, Prichard W, & Jibao S (2018) Norms, networks, power and control: Understanding informal payments and brokerage in cross-border trade in Sierra Leone. Journal of Borderlands Studies 36 (10):77-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/08865655.2018.1510333.
Wallis J (2019) Timor-Leste is a rich country, but also a poor one. In: Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Timor-Leste. London: Routledge. 124-135. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315623177-9.
WorldBank (2020) April 2020 Timor-Leste economic report: A nation under pressure. In Timor Leste. The World Bank, 15 May. [Accessed 15 January 2022]. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/timor-leste/publication/april-2020-timor-leste-economic-report-a-nation-under-pressure.
Yoder LSM (2018) Reconceptualizing land and territory in Oecusse Ambeno enclave's special economic zone. In: Viegas S de M & Feijó RG (ed). Transformations in Independent Timor-Leste. London: Routledge. 142-155. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315535012-8.
Copyright (c) 2023 Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright of this journal is possession of Editorial Board and Journal Manager, by the knowledge of the author, while the moral right of the publication belongs to the author.
The formal legal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA), implies that publication can be used for non-commercial purposes in its original form (cannot be modified).
Every publication (printed/electronic) are open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.
