Penguatan Kelembagaan Kelurahan Pasca Implementasi UU No. 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah
Downloads
The reduction of kelurahan (Sub-District Government) authority has decreased its duties and functions after the implementation of the Law No. 23/2014 on Local Governance. This policy stimulates several kelurahan at Wonosobo Region to propose their villages' status changing from kelurahan into desa (Rural Government). Based on this case, this research aims to analyze the actual performance of kelurahan, and the motives of the village status changing. This research uses descriptive qualitative approach to answer those objectives.
Observation, in-depth interview and focus group discussion are used to obtain data from informants who represent kelurahan, local government, non-government organizations and community leaders. Technique of
data analysis of this research uses interactive data analysis including collecting, condensing, and describing data which is ended by conclusion. Results of study show that although the main function and tasks of kelurahan has decreased significantly, in general, the performance in service area still satisfies the public. However, services for development of public facilities are still far from public expectation. Furthermore, this research also found that there are 4 aspects encouraging the kelurahan to change into desa, namely economic, political, geographical and community profile motives. Implication of this research leads to the need of strengthening of kelurahan particularly in developing physical facilities provision service. It is intended to anticipate the possibility of kelurahan which will be left behind by desa.
Anonim (2015) Demo, warga minta desa dikembalikan. http://www.radarkedu.com/wonosobo/ demo-warga-minta-desa-dikembalikan.
Abdullah MT (2013) Desentralisasi dan efektivitas pemerintahan daerah kabupaten maros. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik 26 (2):108-118.
Boasiako KBA (2010) Public administration: Local government and decentralization in Ghana. Journal of African Studies and Development 2 (7): 166-175.
Ezcurra R (2015) Fiscal Decentralization and Internal Conflict: An Empirical Investigation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 33 (3):580-600.
Garcia VR, Vincent V, Jorge A, Tomas H & Pamela J (2010) The uneven reach of decentralization: a case study among indigenous peoples in the Bolivian Amazon. International Political Science Review 31 (2):229-243.
Lessmann C (2009) Fiscal decentralization and regional disparity: evidence from cross-section and panel data. Environment and Planning A 41 (10): 2455-2473.
Milles BM, Huberman AM & Saldana J (2014) Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methode Sourcebook. USA: Sage Publication. Inc.
Ribot J (2002) Democratic Decentralization of Natural Resources: Institutionalizing popular participation. World Resource Institute.
Sanginga P, Kamugisha R & Martin A (2010) Strengthening social capital for adaptive governance of natural resources: a participatory learning and action research for bylaws reforms in Uganda. Society and Natural Resources 23 (8): 695-710.
Selle AD (2006) The Paradox of Local Empowerment: Decentralization and Democratic Governance in Mexico. University of Maryland, College Park, ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Tang M & Nuhe N (2015) The variant effect of decentralization on trust in national and local governments in Asia. Political Studies 64(1):216-234.
Van Zyil J, Barbosa T, Parker AN & Sonn L (1995) Decentralized Rural Development and Enhanced Community Participation. Policy Working Paper No. 1498, World Bank, Washington, DC.
Copyright of this journal is possession of Editorial Board and Journal Manager, by the knowledge of the author, while the moral right of the publication belongs to the author.
The formal legal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA), implies that publication can be used for non-commercial purposes in its original form (cannot be modified).
Every publication (printed/electronic) are open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.