Sikap Inggris terhadap Indonesia menjelang pertempuran Surabaya 1945
Downloads
This article discusses the difference of British Government decision maker's behavior towards Indonesia since Indonesian independence until the battle of Surabaya, 10 November 1945. There are two assumptions underlying this paper: (1) that behavioural differences are frequently happened and create crises and problems, and (2) that the differences rise were based on interests and each party's capacity that measured by the law of A=f-I&C (Attitude is the function of Interest & Capability). Based on that assumptions, this article proposes two hypotheses: (1) that the Battle of Surabaya was initialized with differences of attitudes taken by the British decision makers. and (2) that the differences were shaped by the realities they were dealing with. This paper focuses on attitudes toward: (1) the task of the British force in the Netherlands East Indies, and (2) the need to confer with the Indonesian leaders. The findings are; not only decision maker's behaviour were different, they also dynamic depending on how they defined circumstances and development of events in Indonesia, in Netherlands, and international affairs.
Acheson D (1945) Memorandum of Conversation by Under Secretary of State. 10 October. [Diakses pada 18 Novemver 2016] https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1945. 1163-1164.
Cumming HS (1945) Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Northern European Affairs, Washington, October 8, 1945. [Diakses pada 18 November 2016] https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1945. 1158-1163.
David FR (2004) Manajemen Strategis: Konsep-konsep. Jakarta: PT Indeks Kelompok Gramedia.
Kahin AR & Kahin G Mct (1977) Subversi sebagai Politik Luar Negeri: Menyingkap Keterlibatan CIA di Indonesia. Penerjemah Dr. R.Z. Leirissa. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
Kroemer KH & Kromer HJ (1997) Engineering Physiology: Bases of Human Factors/Ergonomics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
McMillan R (2005) The British Occupation of Indonesia, 1945-1946: Britain, the Netherlands And the Indonesian Revolution. Royal Asiatic Society Books. New York, NY: Routledge.
Moffat AL (1945a) Memorandum of conversation by the chief of the Division of Southeast Asian Affairs, Washington, October 18, pp. 1165-1167. [Diakses 18 November 2016]
https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1945.
Moffat AL (1945b) Memorandum of Conversation by the Chief of the Division of Southeast Asian Affairs, Washington, November 8, pp. 1170-1172. [Diakses 18 November 2016] https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1945.
Padmodiwiryo S (1995) Memoar Hario Kecik: Autobiografi Seorang Mahasiswa Prajurit. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Roem M (1989) Diplomasi: Ujung Tombak Perjuangan RI. Mochtar K (ed). Jakarta: Penerbit PT Gramedia.
Sularto St & Yunarti DR (2010) Konflik di Balik Proklamasi: BPUPKI, PPKI, Dan Kemerdekaan., Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas.
Susilo IB (2006a) Who Actually Killed Mallaby? The Jakarta Post
Susilo IB (2006b) Who actually killed Mallaby? The Asian Age.
Vrenken M (2014) A common approach? The British and Dutch in the Netherlands East Indies, 1945-1946. Research Papers No. 5. London: King's College London.
Winant (1945) The Ambassador in the United Kingdom to the Secretary of State. Telegram 7 November, 1168-1169. [Diakses 18 November 2016]. https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1945.
Yahaya N (2006) Book Review. Itnerario/Volume 30/Issue 02/July 2006, pp. 220-222. [Diakses 16 Januari 2017]. http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S016511530001442X.
Copyright of this journal is possession of Editorial Board and Journal Manager, by the knowledge of the author, while the moral right of the publication belongs to the author.
The formal legal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA), implies that publication can be used for non-commercial purposes in its original form (cannot be modified).
Every publication (printed/electronic) are open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.