Penguatan identitas lokal dan penolakan vigilantisme atas nama agama
Downloads
After the reformation, the strengthening of local identity has sprung up in several regions in Indonesia. The movement produced the revitalization of adat. These movements underlining the effort from communities which affiliated with a particular ethnic identity to gain claims of management of the natural and political-economic resources in their region. Contestation between the indigenous Dayak community and ‘Front Pembela Islam” (FPI) that occurred in Palangkaraya was a phenomenon that shows how indigenous people were able to assert its right to manage security and morality in their own society. The discourse of FPI's establishment which often associated with vigilantism brought resistance and the refusal from Dayak community in Central Kalimantan. Through demonstrations, DAD and the indigenous Dayak community was able to exclude FPI from Palangkaraya. Thus, this research aims to analyze (1) the history of ethnic and religious identity movements in Indonesia after the reformation and (2) how the contestation between indigenous Dayak community and FPI occurred in the local context according to identity recognition and legitimation. This research used qualitative approach; data gathered through field observation and unstrucutred interviews. The research concludes that there is an awareness in the community to negotiate their position as an opposition to the occurence of a group with particular ideology, which has become the research highlight. This was proven by the case in Palangkaraya that vigilantism on the name of religion is not supposed to be maintain because it violates the right of other group.
Abuza Z (2007) Political Islam and Violence In Indonesia. New York: Routledge.
Antara (2012) Lima pernyataan sikap terhadap penolakan fpi. [Diakses 13 Juni 2016]. http://www.antarajateng.com/detail/-lima-pernyataan-sikap-terhadap-penolakan-fpi.html.
BBC (2012) Aksi unjuk rasa Indonesia tanpa FPI di Jakarta. [Diakses pada 13 Juni 2016]. http://www.bbc.com/indonesia/berita_indonesia/2012/02/120214_antifpi.shtml.
Benda-Beckmann F & Benda-Beckmann K (2011) Myths and stereotypes about adat law: Areassessment of Van Vollenhoven in the light of current struggles over adat law in Indonesia. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde 167 (2/3):167-195.
Davidson & Henley (eds) (2007) The Revival of Tradition in Indonesian Politics: The Deployment of Adat from Colonialism to Indigenism. New York: Routledge.
Diansyah A (2011) Eksistensi damang sebagai hakim perdamaian adat pada masyarakat Suku Dayak di Palangkaraya. Tesis, Universitas Udayana, Bali (tidak diterbitkan).
Denzin NK & Lincoln YS (2005) Introduction: The Dicipline and Practice of Qualitative Research.
Dalam: NK Denzin & YS Lincoln (ed). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research Third Edition. California: Sage Publications.
Holston J & Appadurai A (1996) Cities and citizenship. Public Culture (8):187-204.
Holton J (2008) Insurgent Citizenship: Disjunctions of Democracy and Modernity in Brazil. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Kompas (2008) Habib Rizieq 12 Jam Tanpa Surat Penahanan. [Diakses 13 Juni 2016]. http://lipsus.kompas.com/grammyawards/read/2008/08/20/22311928/Habib.Rizieq.12.Jam.Tanpa.Surat.Penahanan.
Kompas (2013) Mendagri: FPI adalah Aset Bangsa. [Diakses pada 13 Juni 2016] dari http://nasional.kompas.com/read/2013/10/24/1757390/Mendagri.FPI.adalah.Aset.Bangsa.
Klinken Gerry Van (2001) Indonesia's New Ethnic Elites. Dalam Workshop Indonesia in Transition, Yogyakarta, 22 Agustus 2001. [Diakses pada 14 Mei 2016]. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1127117
Klinken Gerry Van (2007) Perang Kota Kecil: Kekerasan Komunal dan Demokratisasi di Indonesia (terjemahan). Jakarta : Yayasan Obor Indonesia.
Kymlicka W (1995) Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. New York: Oxford University Press.
Peraturan Daerah Propinsi Daerah Tingkat I Kalimantan Tengah Nomor 14 Tahun 1998 tentang Kademangan di Propinsi Daerah Tingkat I Kalimantan Tengah.
Peraturan Daerah No.18 tahun 2008 mengenai Kelembagaan Adat Dayak di Kalimantan Tengah.
Rosenbaum HJ & Sederberg PC (1974) Vigilantism: An analysis of establishment violence. Comparative Politics 6(4):541-570.
Tempo (2012) Kronologi penolakan FPI Kalimantan Tengah. [Diakses 13 Juni 2016]. https://m.tempo.co/read/news/2012/02/14/078383860/kronologi-penolakan-fpi-kalimantan-tengah.
Wahid A (ed) (2009) Pengantar Editor. Dalam Ilusi Negara Islam: Ekspansi Gerakan Islam Transnasional di Indonesia. Jakarta: The Wahid Institute. Diunduh pada http://libgen.io/ads.php?md5=FBC80CC8EE88E31F2EAB7619B7B0E062.
Voa-Islam (2012) MUI, NU dan Muhammadiyah Kecam Perusakan Rumah Anggota FPI. [Diakses 13 Juni 2016]. http://www.voa-islam.com/read/indonesiana/2012/02/15/17744/muinumuhammadiyah-kecam-perusakan-rumah-anggota-fpi-palangkaraya/#sthash.rnuBavM6.
dpuf.
Wilson ID (2006) Continuity and change the changing contours of organized violence in post–new order Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies 38:2:265-297.
Copyright of this journal is possession of Editorial Board and Journal Manager, by the knowledge of the author, while the moral right of the publication belongs to the author.
The formal legal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA), implies that publication can be used for non-commercial purposes in its original form (cannot be modified).
Every publication (printed/electronic) are open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.