Particularity and universality: The role of religious and nationality values in the formation of political values of university students
Downloads
The discourse of Islamism in Indonesia in the last ten years has been closely associated with the term radical Islam. In previous studies among students, this term has been often contrasted with nationality values concerning democracy, tolerance, and support for the Unitary State of Indonesian Republic (Known as NKRI). This study aimed to find the particularity and universality of individual political values among university students. This research argued that religious and nationality values become part of individual political values. This research used a quantitative method involving 208 respondents of university students at a state university. The data were analysed using cluster and discriminant analysis to identify the discursive conditions of university students. This research generated three clusters. Cluster 1 is the political tolerant, social media savvy of politics, financially unsatisfied. Cluster 2 is the non-political religious. Cluster 3 is the political religious enthusiast, social media savvy of politics. The three clusters have diversities in terms of interest in politics, the use of social media for political issues and activities, and religious values. However, the three clusters have similarities in nationality values. This research also shows that there is a relationship between political values and the faculty; a correlation between political values with political figures and political parties.
Adorno TW, Frenkel-Brunswik E, Levinson DJ, & Sanford RN (1950) The authoritarian personality. studies in prejudice series. In: Horkheimer M & Flowerman SH (ed). Studies in Prejudice (Issue III).
AF AG (2013) Pemetaan problem radikalisme di SMU Negeri di 4 daerah. Menghalau radikalisme kaum muda: Gagasan dan aksi. Maarif: Arus Pemikiran Islam dan Sosial 8 (1):174-191.
Ajzen I (2005) Attitude, Personality and Behaviour (Second). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Almond GA & Powell Jr B (1966) Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach. Boston, Massachusetts: Little, Brown and Company.
Anderson B (2006) Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (Revised). New York: Verso Books.
Bar-Tal D (1997) The monopolization of patriotism. In: Bar-Tal D & Staub E (ed). Patriotism in The Lives of Individuals and Nations. Boston, Massachusetts: Nelson-Hall. 246-270.
BBC Indonesia (2018) Pelajar SMA di Padang, Sukabumi, dan Solo dianggap paling rentan terpapar radikalisme. BBC Indonesia, 28 January. [Accessed 15 September 2022]. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/indonesia-42832938.
Blank T & Schmidt P (2003) National identity in a United Germany: Nationalism or patriotism? An empirical test with representative data. Political Psychology 24 (2 SPEC):289-312. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895x.00329.
Bloom PBN & Arikan G (2013a) Priming religious belief and religious social behavior affects support for democracy. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 25 (3):368-382. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/eds030.
Bloom PBN & Arikan G (2013b) Religion and support for democracy: A cross-national test of the mediating mechanisms. British Journal of Political Science 43 (2):375-397. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123412000427.
Breznau N, Lykes VA, Kelley J, & Evans MDR (2011) A clash of civilizations? Preferences for religious political leaders in 86 nations. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 50 (4):671-691. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2011.01605.x.
Cottam ML, Mastors E, Preston T, & Dietz-Uhler B (2016) Introduction to Political Psychology (3rd ed). London: Routledge.
Darraz MA (2013) Radikalisme dan lemahnya peran pendidikan kewargaan. Maarif: Arus Pemikiran Islam dan Sosial 8(1):154-173.
De Cleen B & Stavrakakis Y (2017) Distinctions and articulations: A discourse theoretical framework for the study of populism and nationalism. Javnost 24 (4):301-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2017.1330083.
Delanty G & Kumar K (ed) (2016) The Sage Handbook of Nation and Nationalism. California: Sage Publication.
Enjolras B, Steen-Johnsen K, & Wollebí¦k D (2013) Social media and mobilization to offline demonstrations: Transcending participatory divides? New Media and Society 15 (6):890-908. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812462844.
Evans RI (1952) Personal values as factors in anti-Semitism. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 47 (4):749-756. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0058084.
Everitt BS & Dunn G (2001) Applied Multivariate Data Analysis (Second). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fanani AF (2013) Fenomena radikalisme di kalangan kaum muda. Maarif: Arus Pemikirian Islam dan Sosial 8 (1):4-13. https://www.academia.edu/35645483/Fenomena_Radikalisme_di_Kalangan_Anak_Muda.
Fox J (2018) An Introduction to Religion and Politics. In: Haynes J (ed). 2nd (ed). London: Routledge.
Gil de Zúñiga H, Jung N, & Valenzuela S (2012) Social media use for news and individuals' social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17 (3):319-336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x.
Hechter M (2003) Containing Nationalism. Oxford: OUP Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/019924751x.001.0001.
Ibrahim (2010) Agama, negara, dan ruang publik menurut Habermas (Catatan penting untukpluralisme agama di Indonesia). Badati II (3):1-10.
IDN Research Institute (2019) Indonesia millennial report.
Isnanto BA (2019) Sekolah Berpaham radikal dipantau, gubernur jateng: Akan ditertibkan. Detik News, 28 June. [Accessed 15 September 2022]. https://news.detik.com/berita-jawa-tengah/d-4604001/sekolah-berpaham-radikal-dipantau-gubernur-jateng-akan-ditertibkan.
Jolliffe IT (2002) Principal Component Analysis (2nd ed). Heidelberg: Springer.
Jorgensen M & Philips LJ (2002) Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. California: Sage.
Kosterman R & Feshbach S (1989) Toward a Measure of Patriotic and Nationalistic Attitudes. Political Psychology 10 (2):257-274. https://doi.org/10.2307/3791647.
Laclau E (2005) On Populist Reason (1st ed). New York: Verso Books.
Laclau E & Mouffe C (2001) Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics (2nd ed). New York: Verso Books. 198.
Lestari S (2016) Anak-anak muda Indonesia makin radikal? BBC News Indonesia, 16 February. [Accessed 15 September 2022]. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/berita_indonesia/2016/02/160218_indonesia_radikalisme_anak_muda.
Lim M (2013) Many clicks but little sticks: Social media activism in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia 43 (4):636-657. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2013.769386.
Meloen JD (2000) The political culture of state authoritarianism. In: Renshon SA & Duckitt J (ed). Political Psychology: Cultural and Cross-Cultural Perspectives. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 108-127.
Muhammad A & Hiariej E (2021) Deradicalization program in Indonesia radicalizing the radicals. Cogent Social Sciences 7 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1905219.
Nielsen (2016) 2016 working group report. http://multimedia.olympic.org/pdf/en_report_1317.pdf.
Ornstein N, Kohut A, & McCarthy L (1988) The People, The Press & Politics. Boston: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
Phillips LG, Ritchie J, & Perales F (2019) Surveying support for child and youth political participation in Australia and New Zealand. Citizenship Studies 23 (5):460-485. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2019.1620687.
PPIM UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta (2018) Api dalam sekam. Keberagamaan Muslim Gen-Z (Survei nasional tentang keberagamaan di sekolah dan universitas di Indonesia). (PPIM) UIN Jakarta. https://drive.google.com/file/d/15OdGkMWZ5QrV4mZqy6jedKvNzgAxhYY8/view.
Qodir Z (2016) Kaum muda, intoleransi, dan radikalisme agama. Jurnal Studi Pemuda 5 (1):429-445. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22146/studipemudaugm.37127.
Rokeach M (1973) The Nature of Human Values (1st ed). New York: The Free Press.
Saifuddin (2011) Radikalisme Islam di kalangan mahasiswa (Sebuah metamorfosa baru). Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 11 (1):17-32. http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/analisis/article/view/605.
Schatz RT, Staub E, & Lavine H (1999) On the varieties of national attachment: Blind verus constructive patriotism. Political Psychology 20 (1):151-174. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00140.
Sen A (2006) Identity and Violence. The Illusion of Destiny (First). London: Penguin Group.
Shiraishi T (1997) Zaman bergerak. In: Pertiwi EN (ed). Radikalisme Rakyat di Jawa 1912 -1926 (1st ed). Jakarta: PT Pustaka Utama Grafiti.
Sugiyama K & Andree T (2011) The Dentsu Way (1st ed). New York: McGraw Hill.
Tajfel H (2017) The formation of national attitudes: A social-psychological perspectives. In: Sherif M & Sherif CW (ed). Interdisciplinary Relationships in The Social Sciences. London: Routledge. 137-176.
Toft MD, Philpott D, & Shah TS (2011) God's Century. Resurgent Religion and Global Politics. (1st ed). New York: WW Norton & Company.
Valenzuela S (2013) Unpacking the use of social media for protest behavior: The roles of information, opinion expression, and activism. American Behavioral Scientist 57 (7):920-942. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764213479375.
Verba S & Nie NH (1972) Participation in America. Political Democracy and Social Equality (1st ed). New York: Harper & Row.
Wahab AJ (2019) Membaca fenomena baru gerakan salafi di Solo. Dialog 42 (2):225-240. https://doi.org/10.47655/dialog.v42i2.335.
Wahid Institute (2018) Intoleransi kaum muda di tengah kebangkitan kelas menengah Muslim di perkotaan.
Widiyanto D (2019) Waspada paham radikalisme diduga sudah masuk sekolah. Krjogja.com, 23 June. [Accessed 15 September 2022]. https://www.krjogja.com/berita-lokal/read/407440/waspadapahamradikalisme-diduga-sudah-masuk-sekolah.
Yusar Y (2016) The youth, the sciences students, and religious radicalism. Al-Ulum 16 (2):330-347. https://doi.org/10.30603/au.v16i2.154.
Zakiyuddin B (2018) Dinamika radikalisme dan konflik bersentimen keagamaan di Surakarta. Ri'ayah: Jurnal Sosial dan Keagamaan 3 (2):44-68. http://e-journal.metrouniv.ac.id/index.php/riayah/article/view/1319.
Zanna MP & Rempel JK (2009) Attitudes: A new look at an old concept. In: Bar-Tal D & Kruglanski AW (ed). The Social Psychology of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 315-334.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright of this journal is possession of Editorial Board and Journal Manager, by the knowledge of the author, while the moral right of the publication belongs to the author.
The formal legal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA), implies that publication can be used for non-commercial purposes in its original form (cannot be modified).
Every publication (printed/electronic) are open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.