Agrarian conflict and split recognition: The middle way for recognition of the Mapur Bangka Tribe in Indonesia
Downloads
Since the New Order regime, access to tin mines has been a disaster for the Mapur Tribe. The desire to live in prosperity from tin mining led to a prolonged structural agrarian conflict and problems of political recognition. This study aims to analyze agrarian conflicts and the recognition debates that surround them and analyze the visibility of discourses on the recognition that is adaptive to the interests of indigenous peoples. Through qualitative research with case studies, this study found that structural agrarian conflict gave rise to social rupture and acts of mutual exclusion between groups. The counter-movement can unite the group and continue the resistance. After the agrarian conflict, indigenous peoples were faced with debates about the legal product of recognition through sectoral laws which gave rise to different interpretations at the Regional Apparatus Organization (OPD) level. This condition gave rise to the phenomenon of split recognition, due to the lack of political will to include the agenda for recognition of Indigenous Peoples (MHA) in regional planning policies. A comprehensive law with a general function is needed as a middle ground for the unification of arrangements regarding MHA.
Abdurrahman (2015) Draf laporan pengkajian hukum tentang mekanisme pengakuan masyarakat hukum adat. Jakarta: Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sistem Hukum Nasional Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia.
Arsyad I (2016) Analisis aktor dalam pembentukan kebijakan pengakuan masyarakat hukum adat pasca putusan MK 35. Studi kasus peran AMAN dan jaringannya dalam mendorong pengakuan MHA melalui UU Desa dan RUU PPMHA. Thesis, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.
Baggethun GE (2022) Is there a future for indigenous and local knowledge? The Journal of Peasant Studies 49 (6):1139-1157. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2021.1926994.
Bertrand J (2011) Indigenous peoples rights as a strategy of ethnic accommodation: Contrasting experiences of Cordillerans and Papuans in the Philippines and Indonesia. Journal Ethnic and Racial Studies 34 (5):850-869. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2010.537358.
Borras Jr MS (2023) La Via Campesina – transforming agrarian and knowledge politics, and coconstructing a field: A laudation. The Journal of Peasant Studies 50 (2):691-724. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2023.2176760.
Brent WZ (2015) Territorial restructuring and resistance in Argentina. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42 (3-4):671-694.
Cahyono E (2016) Konflik agraria dan hak masyarakat hukum adat di kawasan hutan. Sajogyo Institute dengan di dukung oleh RRI (Rights Resources Initiative). Policy Paper No. 01-PP SAINS 2016.
Calleros-Rodríguez H (2014) Land, conflict, and political process: The case of the Lacandon Community, Chiapas, Mexico (1972-2012). The Journal of Peasant Studies 41 (1):127-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2013.873891.
Cholillah J (2015) Orang Lom: Masalah sosial dan ancaman kearifan lokal dalam tinjauan sosiologi. Jurnal Society III (02):12-24.
Corntassel J (2012) Re-envisioning resurgence: Indigenous pathways to decolonization and sustainable self-determination. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 1 (1):86-101. http://hdl.handle.net/1828/12471.
Cosgrove L & Kliger B (1997) Planning with a difference: A reflection on planning and decision making with indigenous people in Broome, Western Australia. Urban Policy and Research 15 (3):211-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111149708551354.
Darmanto (2015) Kapitalisme pedalaman dan praktik politik etnografi. Jurnal Bhumi 1 (1):113-116.
Davidson SJ, Henley D, & Moniaga S (2010) Adat dalam Politik di Indonesia. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia dan KITLV Jakarta.
Delgado-P G (2015) The practice of autonomy by indigenous peoples. Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies 10 (1):146-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/17442222.2015.1034435.
Docker J (2015) A plethora of intentions: Genocide, settler colonialism and historical consciousness in Australia and Britain. The International Journal of Human Rights 19 (1):74-89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2014.987952.
Fache E (2014) Caring for country, a form of bureaucratic participation. Conservation, development, and neoliberalism in indigenous Australia. Anthropological Forum 24 (3):267-286. https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2014.939576.
Gilbert ED & Afrizal (2018) The land exclusion dilemma and Sumatra's agrarian reactionaries. The Journal of Peasant Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2017.1404990.
Gonda N, Flores S, Casolo JJ, & Nightingale JA (2023) Resilience and conflict: Rethinking climate resilience through Indigenous territorial struggles. The Journal of Peasant Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2161372.
Gonzales T & Gonzales M (2015) Introduction: Indigenous peoples and autonomy in Latin America. Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies 10 (1):1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/17442222.2015.1034437.
Henry R (2015) Double displacement: Indigenous Australians and artefacts of the wet tropics. Anthropological Forum 25 (4):370-383. https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2015.1071239.
Hidayat (2011) Politik agraria transformatif: Studi peluruhan kelembagaan lokal dan kegagalan politik tata kelola agraria pada komunitas petani di DAS Cidanau, Kabupaten Serang Provinsi Banten. Dissertation, Institut Pertanian Bogor, Bogor.
Hilson G & Laing T (2017) Gold mining, indigenous land claims and conflict in Guyana's Hinterland. Journal of Rural Studies 50: 172-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.01.004.
Hossain K & Maruyama H (2016) Japan's admission to the Arctic Council and commitment to the rights of its indigenous Ainu people. The Polar Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/2154896X.2016.1170998.
Karlsson (2014) Indigenous politics: Community formation and indigenous peoples' struggle for selfdetermination in Northeast India. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power 8 (1):7-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2001.9962683.
King JA, Brough M, & Knox M (2014) Negotiating disability and colonisation: The lived experience of indigenous Australians with a disability. Journal Disability & Society 29 (5):738-750. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2013.864257.
Kingstone L (2015) The destruction of identity: Cultural genocide and indigenous peoples. Journal of Human Rights 14 (1):63-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/14754835.2014.886951.
Koerner C (2015) White Australian identities and indigenous land rights. Social Identities 21 (2):87-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2014.1002391.
Komnas HAM (2016) Inkuiri Nasional Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia: Hak Masyarakat Adat Atas Wilayahnya di Kawasan Hutan. Jakarta: Komnas HAM.
Lüdert J (2013) Latin American states and the International Labour Organization: Circumscribing indigenous peoples as internal outsiders. Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies 8 (3):336-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/17442222.2013.841373.
Maddison S (2013) Indigenous identity, ‘authenticity' and the structural violence of settler colonialism. Identities: Global Studies in Culture and Power 20 (3):288-303. https://doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2013.806267.
Mato D (2016) Indigenous people in Latin America: Movements and universities. Achievements, challenges, and intercultural conflicts. Journal of Intercultural Studies 37 (3):211-233. https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.2016.1163536.
Mingorria S (2017) Violence and visibility in oil palm and sugarcane conflicts: The case of Polochic Valley, Guatemala. The Journal of Peasant Studies, https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2017.1293046.
Page A & Petray T (2016) Agency and structural constraints: Indigenous peoples and the Australian settler-state in North Queensland. Journal Settler Colonial Studies 6 (1):88-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/2201473X.2014.993057.
Permadi ST, Rachman B, & Zulkarnain I (2023) The power of exclusion indigenous people Mapur Bangka. Social Science Studies 3 (1):30-46. https://doi.org/10.47153/sss31.5482023.
Polanyi K (2001) The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Massachusetts (US): Beacon Press Books.
PT Timah Tbk (2018) IUP documents for PT Timah Tbk in Belinyu District.
Rachman FN & Siscawati M (2014) Masyarakat hukum adat adalah penyandang hak, subjek hukum, dan pemilik wilayah adatnya: Memahami secara kontekstual putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia atas perkara Nomor 35/PUU-X/2012. Wacana 33 (2):1-11.
Rachman FN (2013) Mengapa konflik-konflik agraria terus-menerus meletus disana-sini? Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan 41: 35-37.
Rahman B (2022) Kearifan Lokal dan Peradaban Kapitalisme di Indonesia. Kuningan: Edukati Inti Cemerlang.
Reed JP (2012) Indigenous land policies, culture and resistance in Latin America. Journal of Peasant Studies 31 (1):137-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/0306615031000169152.
Reyes-García V, Paneque-Gálvez J, Bottazzi P, Luz CA, Gueze M Macía JM, Orta-Martínez M & Pacheco P (2014) Indigenous land reconfiguration and fragmented institutions: A historical political ecology of Tsimane' lands (Bolivian Amazon). Journal of Rural Studies 34 (2014):282-291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.02.007.
Ritzer G (2012) Teori Sosiologi dari Sosiologi Klasik Sampai Perkembangan Terakhir Postmodern. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Roewiastoeti RM (2014) Dampak sosial politik putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi nomor 35/PUU-X/2012. Jurnal Wacana Nomor 33 (XVI):49-59.
Rogers JT & Bain S (2016) Genocide and frontier violence in Australia. Journal of Genocide Research 18 (1):83-100. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623528.2016.1120466.
Sampat P (2015) The ‘Goan Impasse': Land rights and resistance to SEZs in Goa, India. The Journal of Peasant Studies 42 (3-4):765-790.
Sanders W (2015) Indigenous politics in the Australian Journal of Political Science: A review. Australian Journal of Political Science 50 (4):679-694. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2015.1114561.
Savitri LA (2013) Land control and Ideological struggle: Competing articulations of "The owner of land”. Journal of Rural Indonesia 1 (1):35-54. http://ejournal.skpm.ipb.ac.id/index.php/ruralindonesia/article/view/4.
Savitri LA (2014) Rentang batas dari rekognisi hutan adat dalam kepengaturan neoliberal. Jurnal Wacana 33 (Tahun XVI):61-98.
Sekine Y (2021) Emerging ‘agrarian climate justice' struggles in Myanmar. The Journal of Peasant Studies 48 (3):517-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2020.1839054.
Smedal OH (2018) Resistance as a problem an ethnic minority and the state in the twenty-first century Indonesia. In: Bruce Kaffer (ed). State, Resistance, Transformation Anthropological Perspectives on the Dynamics of Power in Contemporary Global Realities. London: Sean Kingstone Publishing.
Sumardjono MSW (2019) Opini: Jalan tengah pengaturan hukum adat. In: Shohibuddin M, Luthfi AN, & Utami W. Meninjau Ulang Pengaturan Hak Adat. Yogyakarta: STPNPress dan Pusat Studi Agraria Institut Pertanian Bogor.
Suryani D (2016) Structural violation of indigenous human rights in Indonesia: A case study of Merauke Integrated Food and Energy Estate (MIFEE) in Papua. Jurnal Masyarakat & Budaya 18 (1):97-108. https://jmb.lipi.go.id/jmb/article/view/343.
Zulkarnain I & Franto (2014) Pemberdayaan masyarakat melalui pemetaan partisipatif untuk identifikasi dan pemetaan wilayah adat Suku Lom di Kecamatan Belinyu Kabupaten Bangka. Laporan Penelitian Universitas Bangka Belitung. Unpunished.
Zulkarnain I, Cholillah J, Nazriansyah A, & Rahmat J (2023) The Mapur Bangka Ethnic in between conflict dan politic of recognition in the postextractive era. Proceeding ICLSSE: 2-9.
Zulkarnain I, Soetarto E, Sunito S, & Adiwibowo S (2018) Pembungkaman suara politik pengakuan masyarakat adat dalam perspektif ekonomi politik (Studi kasus di Suku Mapur Lom Bangka Belitung). Sodality 6 (3):237-245.
Zulkarnain I, Soetarto E, Sunito S, & Adiwibowo S (2019) Tin mining and political territory of Lom indigenous people in Bangka Belitung, Indonesia. In: International Conference on Maritime and Archipelago (ICoMA 2018). Atlantis Press. 297-302. https://doi.org/10.2991/icoma-18.2019.63.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright of this journal is possession of Editorial Board and Journal Manager, by the knowledge of the author, while the moral right of the publication belongs to the author.
The formal legal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA), implies that publication can be used for non-commercial purposes in its original form (cannot be modified).
Every publication (printed/electronic) are open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.
