Gray area between policy success and failure: Assessing the degree of success of Law Number 7 of 2016 in the salt industrialization program in West Nusa Tenggara Province
Downloads
Salt problems in Indonesia are quite complex and persistent, including reliance on imports, low quality, poor trade administration, and high costs. The central government has issued a policy that protects salt farmers, regulates salt imports, and implements the PUGaR program. The NTB Provincial Government as the fourth largest contributor to salt production in Indonesia has a Salt Industrialization Program policy. This article analyzed the existing policies for overcoming the problems and achieving the expected results. Using a descriptive qualitative research method with Policy Success theory proposed by Allan McConnell as its analytical tool, this article examines the success/failure of salt policy from the process, program, and political dimensions, as well as the level of success using the degree of policy success/failure. The results of the study showed that the criterion for maintaining policy objectives/instruments and policy legitimacy on the process dimension is included in tolerable failure because there is still a failure to maintain objectives and legitimacy even though it is not significant. The criterion for building a sustainable coalition is included in conflicted failures because it has not involved all stakeholders in policy formulation. In the program dimension, the criteria for implementation that is aligned with objectives, achieving the expected outcomes, and providing benefits for the target group are included in the conflicted failure category because there are balanced conditions between success and failure. Meanwhile, the political dimension cannot be measured because it still receives minimal public attention.
Abdullah A & Shalihati F (2020) The effectiveness of the salt policy in Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen & Agribisnis 17 (3):315-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.17358/jma.17.3.315.
Ansell C, Doberstein C, Henderson H, Siddiki S, & Hart P (2020) Understanding inclusion in collaborative governance: A mixed methods approach. Policy and Society 39 (4):570-591. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1785726.
Ansell C, Sí¸rensen E, & Torfing J (2017) Improving policy implementation throug collaborative policymaking. Policy & Politics 45 (3): 467-486. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557317X14972799760260.
Ansell C & Gash A (2008) Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4):543-571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032.
Badan Pusat Statistik (2022) Statistik Indonesia 2022. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik.
Bovens M & ‘t Hart P (2016) Revisiting the study of policy failure. Journal of European Public Policy 23 (5):653-666. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1127273.
Fellows CJ & Dollery B (2021) Australian government failure and the VET FEE-HELP loan programme. International Journal of Educational Management 35 (1):271-281.
Figueroa Huencho V (2021) Why do indigenous public policies fail? Policy Studies 43 (2):125-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2021.1954608.
Hammond J, Bailey S, Gore O, Checkland K, Darley S, Mcdonald R, & Blakeman T (2021) The Problem of Success and Failure in Public-private Innovation Partnerships. Journal of Social Policy 51 (4):771-791. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279421000192.
Helmi A & Sasaoka M (2018) Dealing with socioeconomic and climate-related uncertainty in smallscale salt producers in rural Sampang, Indonesia. Journal of rural studies 59: 88-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.02.005.
Hidayat R & Raman A (2020) The dark side of regulatory economics: Evidence from the salt import policy in Post-Soeharto Indonesia. International Journal of Demos 2 (1):1-20.
Hudson B, Hunter D, & Peckham S (2019) Policy failure and the policy-implementation gap: Can policy support programs help?. Policy Design and Practice 2 (1):1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2018.1540378.
Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan (2019) Peraturan Menteri Kelautan dan Perikanan nomor 17/PERMEN-KP/2020 tentang rencana strategis kementerian kelautan dan perikanan tahun 2020-2024. Jakarta.
Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan (2022a) Laporan kinerja Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan 2021. Jakarta.
Kementerian Kelautan dan Perikanan (2022b) Analisis indikator kinerja utama sektor kelautan dan perikanan kurun waktu 2017-2021. Jakarta.
Komariyah S, Yuliati L, Mustofa M, & Supeni N (2021) Pricing strategy at the local salt industry institutional structure of East Java, Indonesia. Jurnal Perspektif Pembiayaan dan Pembangunan Daerah 9 (3):257-278. https://doi.org/10.22437/ppd.v9i3.11698.
Mahasin MZ, Rochwulaningsih Y, & Sulistiyono ST (2021) The persistence of Chinese monopoly in Indonesia's salt business and marginalisation of local salt farmers. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2021.1955514.
McConnell A (2010a) Policy success, policy failure and gray areas in-between. Journal of International Public Policy 30 (3):345-362. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X10000152.
McConnell A (2010b) Understanding Policy Success: Rethinking Public Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
McConnell A (2015) What is policy failure? A primer to help navigate the maze. Public Policy and Administration 30 (3-4):221-242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076714565416.
Ohlhorst SD, Slavin M, Bhide JM, & Bugusu B (2012) Use of iodized salt in processed foods in select countries around the world and the role of food processors. Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety 11 (2):233-284. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2011.00182.x.
Olavarría-Gambi M (2018) Policy failure revisited: Conceptual implications from the Chilean case of Transantiago. Administration & Society 52 (5):690-717.
Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Timur (2021) Laporan kinerja garam di Provinsi Jawa Timur. Dinas Perdagangan dan Perindustrian Provinsi Jawa Timur.
Pemerintah Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat (2019a) Peraturan Gubernur NTB nomor 44 Tahun 2019 tentang program strategis dan unggulan daerah dalam pencapaian indikator kinerja utama Pemerintah Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat Tahun 2019-2023. Nusa Tenggara Barat.
Pemerintah Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat (2019b) Roadmap usaha garam rakyat 2020-2024 Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat.
Pemerintah Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat (2021) Peraturan Daerah Provinsi NTB nomor 2 Tahun 2021 tentang perubahan perda nomor 1 tahun 2019 tentang RPJMD Provinsi NTB tahun 2019-2023. Nusa Tenggara Barat.
Pemerintah Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Barat (2022) Peraturan Daerah nomor 3 Tahun 2022 tentang perlindungan dan pemberdayaan petambak garam. Nusa Tenggara Barat.
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia (2016) Undang-Undang nomor 7 Tahun 2016 tentang perlindungan dan pemberdayaan nelayan, pembudi daya ikan dan petambak garam. Jakarta.
Sokołowski J & Bouzarovski S (2022) Decarbonisation of the Polish residential sector between the 1990s and 2021: A case study of policy failures. Energy Policy 163: 112848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112848.
Sudaryana B & Pramesti P (2018) The strategy of welfare improvement for salt farmers in Indonesia. In: MATEC Web of Conferences 150, 23 February, Malaysia. EDP Sciences. Les Ulis: MATEC Web of Conferences. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815005062.
Sumarto M (2021) Welfare and conflict: Policy failure in the Indonesian cash transfer. Journal of Social Policy 50 (3):533-551. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279420000252.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright of this journal is possession of Editorial Board and Journal Manager, by the knowledge of the author, while the moral right of the publication belongs to the author.
The formal legal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA), implies that publication can be used for non-commercial purposes in its original form (cannot be modified).
Every publication (printed/electronic) are open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.