Vietnam in the democratization process: Dynamics from the process of international integration and the development of information-communication technology
Downloads
This article delves into the complex dynamics of Vietnam’s democratization process, highlighting the simultaneous influences of international integration and advancements in science and technology. This study investigates the impact of Vietnam’s increasing involvement in the global economy and international community, as well as its adoption of technological advancements, on the country’s path toward democratization. The study utilizes a mixed approach, blending qualitative analysis of scientific documents, Vietnamese government policies, and quantitative data on the democracy index from international organizations. It identifies international integration as a doubleedged sword: on one hand, it boosts economic growth and development, driving the democratic transition process forward; on the other hand, it also leads to economic dependence and inequality, potentially impeding democratic reform. The findings of this study show that the rapid progress of science and technology, especially information and communication technology, presents both opportunities and difficulties for Vietnam’s democratic process. It provides unparalleled opportunities for widespread involvement in political activities and the spread of democratic principles, but it also carries the risk of social unrest and the potential for the authoritarian state to control and manipulate information.
Acemoğlu D & Robinson JA (2005) Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511510809.
Agartan K (2014) Globalization and the question of social justice. Sociology Compass 8 (6):903-915. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12162.
Ananyev M & Petrova M (2017) Information and communication technologies, protests, and censorship. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2978549.
Ball B (2021) Defeating fake news: On journalism, knowledge, and democracy. Moral Philosophy and Politics 8 (1):5-26. https://doi.org/10.1515/mopp-2019-0033.
Bolton P, Roland G, & Spolaore E (1996) Economic theories of the break-up and integration of nations. European Economic Review 40 (3-5):697-705. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(95)00081-X.
Boothroyd P & Phạm XN (ed) (2000) Socioeconomic Renovation in Viet Nam: The Origin, Evolution, and Impact of Doi Moi.
Bowen GA (2009) Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9 (2):27-40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027.
Brou D & Ruta M (2011) Economic integration, political integration or both? Journal of the European Economic Association 9 (6):1143-1167. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01037.x.
Bui NS (2020) The integration model. In: Constitutional Change in the Contemporary Socialist World. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 209-243. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198851349.003.0006
Bui TH (2016) The influence of social media in Vietnam’s elite politics. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 35 (2):89-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341603500204.
Colmer M (1994) Information technology and politics. The Australian Library Journal 43 (2):118-131. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049670.1994.10755678.
Communist Party of Vietnam (2021) Documents of the 13th National Congress. Hanoi: Publishing House National Politics Truth.
Dahlander L & Gann DM (2010) How open is innovation? Research Policy 39 (6):699-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.013.
Data Reportal (2023) Digital 2023: Vietnam. Data Reportal, 13 February 2023. [Accessed 9 November 2023]. https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023-vietnam.
Davydov VN, Nguyen TA, & Zotkina AL (2022) Social networks as a challenge to Vietnam’s political stability. RUDN Journal of Public Administration 9 (4):438-455. https://doi.org/10.22363/2312-8313-2022-9-4-438-455.
Department of Information and Communications of Son La province (2022) It is impossible to deny Vietnam’s democratic and human rights values. Department of Information and Communications of Son La province, 29 July. [Accessed 8 November 2023]. https://sotttt.sonla.gov.vn/1229/27531/81967/647243/xay-dung-dang-va-bao-ve-nen-tang-tu-tuong/khong-the-phunhan-gia-tri-dan-chu-nhan-quyen-cua-viet-nam.
Dharmaraj S (2019) Vietnam creates policies for Industry 4.0. OpenGov Asia, 2 October. [Accessed 7 November 2023]. https://opengovasia.com/vietnam-creates-policies-for-industry-4-0/.
Do TT (2022) Vietnam’s emergence as a middle power in Asia: Unfolding the power–knowledge nexus. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 41 (2):279-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034221081146.
Eun Y-S, Acharya A, & na Thalang C (2022) Unpacking the dynamics of weak states’ agency. The Pacific Review 35 (2):229-244. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2021.1998200.
Freedom House (2021) Cuba: Freedom in the world 2021 country report. Freedom House. [Accessed 20 February 2024]. https://freedomhouse.org/country/cuba/freedom-world/2021.
Freedom House (2023) Vietnam: Freedom on the net 2023 country report. Freedom House. [Accessed 8 November 2023]. https://freedomhouse.org/country/vietnam/freedom-net/2023.
Freeman JR & Quinn DP (2012) The economic origins of democracy reconsidered. American Political Science Review 106 (1):58-80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000505.
Friis C, Reenberg A, Heinimann A, & Schönweger O (2016) Changing local land systems: Implications of a Chinese rubber plantation in Nambak District, Lao PDR. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 37 (1):25-42. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjtg.12137.
General Statistics Office of Vietnam (2023) Hanoi leads the country in attracting foreign investment first 6 months of 2023. General Statistics Office of Vietnam, 7 July. [Accessed 8 November 2023]. https://www.gso.gov.vn/en/data-and-statistics/2023/07/hanoi-leads-the-country-in-attractingforeign-investment-first-6-months-of-2023/.
Gibler DM & Wolford S (2006) Alliances, then democracy. Journal of Conflict Resolution 50 (1):129-153. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002705281360.
Goldin I & Vogel T (2010) Global governance and systemic risk in the 21st century: Lessons from the financial crisis. Global Policy 1 (1):4-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5899.2009.00011.x.
Gürcan EC (2014) Cuban agriculture and food sovereignty. Latin American Perspectives 41 (4):129-146. https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X13518750.
Hai & Thu (2018) More than 85% of national assembly deputies agreed to roll back the law on special zones. VnExpress, 11 June. [Accessed 9 November 2023]. https://vnexpress.net/hon-85-dai-bieuquoc-hoi-dong-y-lui-luat-dac-khu-3761712.html.
Hardi P (1980) Why do communist parties advocate pluralism? World Politics 32 (4):531-552. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010056.
Hoa LQ (2022) The impact of the 4th industrial revolution on organizational innovation and operating methods of the Communist Party of Vietnam. Communist magazine, 29 August. [Accessed 7 November 2023]. https://tapchicongsan.org.vn/web/guest/the-gioi-van-de-su-kien/-/2018/825809/tac-dong-cua-cuoccach-mang-cong-nghiep-lan-thu-tu-den-the-gioi%2C-khu-vuc-va-viet-nam.aspx.
Hong HTM (2002) Media and civil society in support of good governance and democracy in Vietnam. Media Asia 29 (1):24-29. https://doi.org/10.1080/01296612.2002.11726659.
Howard PN, Agarwal SD, & Hussain MM (2011) When do states disconnect their digital networks? Regime responses to the political uses of social media. The Communication Review 14 (3):216-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/10714421.2011.597254.
Human Rights Watch (2019) EU: Postpone vote on Vietnam free trade agreement. Human Rights Watch, 10 January. [Accessed 15 November 2023]. Https://Www.Hrw.Org/News/2019/01/10/EuPostpone-Vote-Vietnam-Free-Trade-Agreement.
Huntington SP (1991) The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
International IDEA (2022) Vietnam. The Global State of Democracy. [Accessed 21 February 2024]. https://www.idea.int/democracytracker/country/vietnam.
International IDEA (2023) Global state of democracy indices. The Global State of Democracy. [Accessed 25 February 2024]. https://www.idea.int/democracytracker/gsod-indices.
Jha CK & Kodila-Tedika O (2020) Does social media promote democracy? Some empirical evidence. Journal of Policy Modeling 42 (2):271-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2019.05.010.
Kalathil S & Boas TC (2001) The internet and state control in authoritarian regimes: China, Cuba, and the counterrevolution. Carnegie Endowment Working Papers, number 21, July 2001. https://carnegieendowment.org/files/21KalathilBoas.pdf.
Keohane RO, Macedo S, & Moravcsik A (2009) Democracy-enhancing multilateralism. International Organization 63 (1):1-31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309090018.
Keping Y (2016) Democracy in China: Challenge or opportunity? In: Democracy in China. Joint Imprint with Central Compilation and Translation Press, China. 16-27. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814641531_0002.
Khuong P (2023). The number of Vietnamese internet users ranks among the top in the world. Vietnam.vn, 18 December. [Accessed 21 February 2024]. https://www.vietnam.vn/luong-nguoi-dunginternet-viet-nam-dung-hang-dau-the-gioi/.
Kien TN & Heo Y (2008) Doi Moi policy and socio-economic development in Vietnam, 1986–2005. International Area Review 11 (1):205-232. https://doi.org/10.1177/223386590801100112.
King G, Pan J, & Roberts M (2013) How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review 107 (2):326-343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000014.
Lam V (2022) Information and communications technologies, online activism, and implications for Vietnam’s public diplomacy. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs 41 (1):3-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034211002850.
Li S & Wang B (2020) Is social justice the superior economic growth model? Comparative analysis on G20 countries. Cogent Social Sciences 6 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2020.1760413.
Lipset SM (1959) Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. The American Political Science Review 53: 69-105.
Linz JJ (1978) Crisis, Breakdown & Reequilibration. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Lu LYY & Liu JS (2014) The knowledge diffusion paths of corporate social responsibility – from 1970 to 2011. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 21 (2):113-128. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1309.
Magistretti G & Tabellini M (2017) Economic integration and democracy: An empirical investigation. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3220028.
Mansfield ED & Pevehouse JC (2006) Democratization and international organizations. International Organization 60 (01). https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830606005X.
Mikhailovich LI (2022) Democratization. Social Phenomena, Processes. Bigenc.ru, 4 October. [Accessed 8 November 2023]. https://bigenc.ru/c/demokratizatsiia-f71395.
Miletello EC (2011) The page you are attempting to access has been blocked in accordance with national laws: Applying a corporate responsibility framework to human rights issues facing internet companies. Pittsburgh Journal of Technology Law and Policy 11. https://doi.org/10.5195/TLP.2011.61.
Mitter R & Johnson E (2021) What the west gets wrong about China. Harvard Business Review, the May - June 2021 issue. [Accessed 21 February 2024]. https://hbr.org/2021/05/what-the-west-getswrong-about-china.
Neher CD (1991) Democratization in Southeast Asia. Asian Affairs: An American Review 18 (3):139-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/00927678.1991.10553543.
Nguyen AT & Hoai DX (2021) Vietnam’s efforts in the process of realization. Quân đội nhân dân, 15 December. [Accessed 7 November 2023]. https://www.qdnd.vn/phong-chong-dien-bien-hoabinh/bai-3-no-luc-cua-viet-nam-trong-tien-trinh-hien-thuc-hoa-tiep-theo-va-het-680465.
Nguyen AT (2023) The impact of the fourth industrial revolution on the world, the region and Vietnam. Communist Magazine 29 August. [Accessed 7 November 2023]. https://tapchicongsan.org.vn/web/guest/the-gioi-van-de-su-kien/-/2018/825809/tac-dong-cua-cuoc-cach-mang-cong-nghieplan-thu-tu-den-the-gioi%2C-khu-vuc-va-viet-nam.aspx.
Nguyen D (2018) Three stability to attract FDI. Cổng Thông Tin Điện Tử Bộ Tài Chính, 15 October 15. [Accessed 25 November 2023]. Https://Mof.Gov.vn/Webcenter/Portal/Vclvcstc/Pages_r/l/ChiTiet-Tin?DDocName=UCMTMP125069.
Nguyen HP & Pham HT (2012) The dark side of development in Vietnam. Journal of Macromarketing 32 (1):74-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276146711423666.
O’Donnell G & Schmitter P (1986) Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Policardo L (2015) Democratization, environmental and income inequality. Environment and Development Economics 20 (6):813-835. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X15000029.
Politburo of the Communist Party of Vietnam (2021) Resolution No. 52/NQ-TU on a number of guidelines and policies to proactively participate in the 4th industrial revolution.
Przeworski A & Limongi F (1997) Modernization: Theories and facts. World Politics 49 (2):155-183. https://doi.org/10.1353/wp.1997.0004.
Qiang X (2019) President XI’s surveillance state. Journal of Democracy 30 (1):53-67. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2019.0004.
Reglitz M (2022) Fake news and democracy. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 22 (2). https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v22i2.1258.
Rustow DA (1999) Transitions to democracy: Toward a dynamic model. In: Transitions to Democracy. New York: Columbia University Press. 14-41.
Samosir HE (2023) Election socialization through a cross-cultural communication approach. Journal of Humanities and Social Studies 7 (1):113-117. https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v7i1.7471.
Sanborn H & Thyne CL (2014) Learning democracy: Education and the fall of authoritarian regimes. British Journal of Political Science 44 (4):773-797. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123413000082.
Sand-Zantman W (2004) Economic integration and political accountability. European Economic Review 48 (5):1001-1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2003.09.008.
Sayers JG (2013) Book review: Manuel Castells, Communication Power. Work, Employment and Society 28 (1):142-144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017013511515.
Share D (1987) Transitions to democracy and transition through transaction. Comparative Political Studies 19 (4):525-548. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414087019004004.
Sharma R (1999) Liberalisation in Vietnam: A new strategy for a state in transition. China Report 35 (1):97-103. https://doi.org/10.1177/000944559903500106.
Shirazi F, Ngwenyama O, & Morawczynski O (2010) ICT expansion and the digital divide in democratic freedoms: An analysis of the impact of ICT expansion, education and ICT filtering on democracy. Telematics and Informatics 27 (1):21-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2009.05.001.
Sonoda M, Syhavong B, Vongsamphanh C, Phoutsavath P, Inthapanith P, Rotem A, & Fujita N (2017) The evolution of the national licensing system of health care professionals: A qualitative descriptive case study in Lao People’s Democratic Republic. Human Resources for Health 15 (1):51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-017-0215-2.
Southall R (2003) Democracy in Southern Africa: Moving beyond a difficult legacy. Review of African Political Economy 30 (96). https://doi.org/10.1080/03056244.2003.9693499.
Surborg B (2008) On-line with the people in line: Internet development and flexible control of the net in Vietnam. Geoforum 39 (1):344-357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2007.07.008.
Tai Y & Fu K (2020) Specificity, conflict, and focal point: A systematic investigation into social media censorship in China. Journal of Communication 70 (6):842-867. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqaa032.
Tan ND (2020) Reviews and proposals to supplement and complete the party’s guidelines and the government’s policies and laws on ethnic minority migration. VNU Journal of Science: Policy and Management Studies 36 (1). https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1116/vnupam.4224.
Thanh VV (2015) Posting press information of the government office on Facebook. Tuoi Tre Online Newspaper, 21 October. [Accessed 8 September 2023]. https://tuoitre.vn/dua-thong-tin-bao-chicua-van-phong-chinh-phu-len-facebook-988819.htm.
The Economist (2022) The world’s most, and least, democratic countries in 2022. The economist, 1 February. [Accessed 8 November 2023]. https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2023/02/01/the-worlds-most-and-least-democratic-countries-in-2022.
Thoa TT (2023) Problems of ensuring democracy under one-party rule in modern Vietnam. Territory Development 3: 66-73. https://doi.org/10.32324/2412-8945-2023-3-66-73.
Tien TD (2019) Does international integration cause loss of independence, autonomy and national identity? Communist Magazine, 18 November. [Accessed 8 November 2023]. https://www.tapchicongsan.org.vn/web/guest/dau-tranh-phan-bac-cac-luan-dieu-sai-trai-thu-dich/chi-tiet/-/asset_publisher/YqSB2JpnYto9/content/hoi-nhap-quoc-te-co-lam-mat-oc-lap-tu-chu-va-ban-sac-dan-toc-.
Trading Economics (2022) Vietnam - Individuals Using the Internet (% of Population). Trading Economics. [Accessed 5 November 2023]. https://tradingeconomics.com/vietnam/individualsusing-the-internet-percent-of-population-wb-data.html.
Trang D & Long X (2015) Announcing a series of violations in the tree cutting case in Hanoi. Tuoi Tre Newspaper Online, 15 May. [Accessed 9 November 2023]. https://tuoitre.vn/ket-qua-thanh-travu-chat-cay-xanh-ha-noi-749058.htm.
Trong NP (2022) Some theoretical and practical issues about socialism and the path to socialism in Vietnam. Truth National Political Publishing House, Ha Noi.
Ty Pheanusa S (2021) Prospect for democratization in China. Honors Capstones 927. https://huskiecommons.lib.niu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1926&context=studentengagementhonorscapstones.
Vietnamese Government (2023) Economic integration is the focus, integration in other fields must facilitate economic integration. Vietnamese Government, 13 August. [Accessed 8 November 2023]. https://baochinhphu.vn/hoi-nhap-kinh-te-la-trong-tam-hoi-nhap-cac-linh-vuc-khac-phaitao-thuan-loi-cho-hoi-nhap-kinh-te-102230813140724068.htm.
Weare C (2002) The internet and democracy: The causal links between technology and politics. International Journal of Public Administration 25 (5):659-691. https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD120003294.
Weiss C (2005) Science, technology and international relations. Technology in Society 27 (3):295-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.04.004.
Welzel C & Inglehart R (2005) Democratization as the growth of freedom: The human development perspective. Japanese Journal of Political Science 6 (3):313-343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1468109905001933.
Wiggins BE & Bowers GB (2015) Memes as genre: A structurational analysis of the memescape. New Media & Society 17 (11):1886-1906. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814535194.
Williams M (1987) Vietnam: The slow road to reform. Journal of Communist Studies 3 (4):102-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523278708414893.
Wright J & Escribà-Folch A (2012) Authoritarian institutions and regime survival: Transitions to democracy and subsequent autocracy. British Journal of Political Science 42 (2):283-309. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123411000317.
Zhang B (1993) Institutional aspects of reforms and the democratization of communist regimes. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 26 (2):165-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-067X(93)90010-O.
Zhang LL (2006) Behind the ‘Great Firewall.’ Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 12 (3):271-291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856506067201.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright of this journal is possession of Editorial Board and Journal Manager, by the knowledge of the author, while the moral right of the publication belongs to the author.
The formal legal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA), implies that publication can be used for non-commercial purposes in its original form (cannot be modified).
Every publication (printed/electronic) are open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.
