Kompensasi dan Restitusi yang Berorientasi pada Korban Tindak Pidana
Downloads
The study proposes the compensation and restitution regulations which should be oriented to protect the victim of crime. Although most regulations have been adopted the right of the victims to receive the compensation and restitution, but this study finds that there are some weaknesses in such regulations. Hence, compensation regulation should be specifically focused on the fulfillment of the right of the victims of crime. It shall not depend on court decisions, but such compensation should be provided even though the victims ceased before the court proceeding has started, or even if he or she wrongly arrested by police. This compensation is only to cover material losses and traumatic stress recovery cost. It could be paid directly monthly/yearly and could be converted to other form of compensation. Restitution refers to the paradigm of restorative justice. In Indonesia, restitution should be based on final and binding court decision. If the perpetrator does not want to provide it for the victim, he/she has moral obligation to provide it for the victim oven without inkracht court decision, and this could be used by the judges to pardon the perpetrator. Restitution shall be enforced for all criminal offences which resulting direct and indirect losses for the victims. Restitution is not merely about monetary values but moral obligation of the perpetrator to recover the victim's condition.
Downloads
Andi Sofyan dan Abd. Asis, Hukum Acara Pidana: Suatu Pengantar (Karisma Putra Utama 2014).
Angkasa, ‘Kedudukan Korban Dana Sistem Peradilan Pidana', Pelatihan Viktimologi Indonesia (Universitas Jenderal Soedirman 2016).
Chairul Huda, Dari Tiada Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan Menuju Tiada Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Tanpa Kesalahan (Kencana 2006).
G Widiartana, ‘Ide Keadilan Restoratif Pada Kebijakan Penanggulangan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga Dengan Hukum Pidana', Ringkasan Disertasi pada Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum (2011).
Mahrus Ali,[et.,al.], ‘Urgensi Dan Legalitas Pemberian Kesaksian Melalui Teleconference Dalam Persidangan Perkara Pidana', Laporan Penelitian Kerjasama LPSK dengan FH UII (2013).
P.A.F. Lamintang, Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Indonesia (PT Citra Aditya Bakti 2011.
Supriyadi Widodo dan Zainal Abidin, Memastikan Pemenuhan Hak Atas Reparasi Korban Pelanggaran HAM Yang Berat (Institute for Criminal Justice Reform 2014).
Working Group on Trafficking in Persons, Compensation of Victims of Trafficking in Persons National Approaches to Compensation of Victims of Trafficking in Persons (Working Group on Trafficking in Persons 2010) <https://www.unodc.org/documents/treaties/organized_crime/COP5/CTOC_COP_WG4_2010_CRP1/CTOC_COP_WG4_2010_CRP1_E.pdf>.
Yahya Harahap, Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, Dan Peninjauan Kembali (2rd edn, Sinar Grafika 2008).
Benedict J Monachino, ‘ 'Enhancing Victims' Rights Crime Victims Compensation' [2008] New York State Bar Journal.
Bridgett N Shephard, ‘Classifying Crime Victim Restitution: The Theoretical Arguments and Practical Consequences of Labeling Restitution As Either A Criminal or Civil Law Concept' (2014) 18 Lewis& Clark Law Review <https://law.lclark.edu/live/files/18298-lcb183art15shephardfinalpdf>.
Cortney E Lollar, ‘What Is Criminal Restitution?' (2014) 93 Iowa Law Review.
Dennis F DiBari, ‘Restoring Restitution: The Role of Proximate Causation in Child Pornography Possession Cases Where Restitution Is Sought' [2011] Cardozo Law Review.
Fauzy Marasabessy, ‘Restitusi Bagi Korban Tindak Pidana: Sebuah Tawaran Mekanisme Baru' (2015) 45 Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan <http://jhp.ui.ac.id/index.php/home/article/viewFile/9/9>.
Frédéric Mégret, ‘Justifying Compensation By The International Criminal Court's Victims Trust Fund: Lessons From Domestic Compensation Schemes' (2010) 36 Brooklyn Journal of International Law.
Gabriel H Teninbaum, ‘Easing The Burden: Mediating Misdemeanor Criminal Matters' (2007) 62 Dispute Resolution Journal.
Jack B Weinstein, ‘Some Benefit and Risks of Privatization of Justice Though ADR' [1996] Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution.
Juan Cardenas, ‘The Crime Victim in the Prosecutorial Process' (1986) 9 Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy.
Julie Goldscheid, ‘Crime Victim Compensation an a Post-9/11 World' (2004) 167 Tulane Law Review.
Karyn Ellen Polito, ‘The Rights of Crime Victims in the Criminal Justice System: Is Justice Blind to the Victims of Crime?' (1990) 16 New England Journal on Criminal and Civil Confinement.
Lieutenant Colonel Warren G Foote, ‘State Compensation for Victims of Crime' (1992) March Army Lawyer.
Linda F Frank, ‘The Collection of Restitution: An Often Overlooked Service to Crime Victims' [1992] Saint John's Journal of Legal Commentary.
Marcus A Asner,[et.,al.], ‘Restitution From the Victim Perspective-Recent Developments And Future Trends' (2013) 26 Federal Sentencing Reporter.
Mary Ellen Reimund, ‘Mediation in Criminal Justice: A Restorative Approach' (2003) 46 Advocate.
Nicholas C Katsoris, ‘The European Convention on the Compensation of Victims of Violent Crimes: A Decade of Frustration' (1990) 14 Fordham International Law Journal.
Susan E. GeganNicholas Ernesto Rodriguez, ‘Victims' Roles in the Criminal Justice System: A Fallacy of Victim Empowerment?' (1992) 8 Saint John's Journal of Legal Commentary.
Undang-undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana.
Undang-undang Nomor 26 Tahun 2000 Tentang Pengadilan Hak Asasi Manusia.
Undang-undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2003 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Terorisme.
Undang-undang Nomor13 Tahun 2006 jo Undang-undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban.
Undang-undang Nomor 21 Tahun 2007 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 3 Tahun 2002 Tentang Kompensasi, Restituti dan Rehabilitasi terhadap Korban Pelanggaran Hak Asasi Manusia yang Berat.
Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 44 Tahun 2008 Tentang Pemberian Kompensasi, Restitusi dan Bantuan Kepada Saksi dan Korban.
