Kinerja kelembagaan program sanitasi lingkungan berbasis masyarakat (SLBM)
Downloads
SLBM Program implementation in Banyumas Regency involves many stakeholders, one of them is community. Through KSM, community has authority to manage program from, beside government roles as facilitator. Thus, institutional system is required to support performance of KSM. By using descriptive qualitative approach, this research aimed to analyze institutional performances of KSM and aspects which is able to support and inhibit the institutional performance of KSM. This research found that institutional performance of KSM has not been able to reach policy goals. This can be seen from community participation in SLBM program. Program’s effectiveness is also not optimal. Thus, there have been no changes in the community habits of sanitation-related issues. Moreover, some of support and inhibit aspects of institutional performance of KSM has indentified.
Alexander ER (2005) Institutional transformation and planning: from institutionalization theory to institutional design. Sage Publications Vol 4 (3):209-223.
Baker R & Rennie MD (2012) An instutional perspective on the development of Canada’s first public accounts. Sage Publications 18(1):31-50.
Callahan K (2007) Elements of effective governance: measurement, accountability, and participation. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group.
Creswell J (2010) Desain Penelitian, Pendekatan Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif terjemahan Angkatan III & IV, Jakarta: KIK-UI. KIK Press.
Habermas J (1984) The theory of communicative action: reason and the rationalization of society, Vol I. Boston: Beacon Press. 284-287.
Hill MJ (2005) The public policy proccess (4th edition). Pearson education Limited, Essex.
Innes J & Booher D (2003) Collaborative policy making: governance through dialogue. Dalam: M. Hajer (ed). Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Milles BM & Huberman MA (1992) Qualitative data analysis. New York: SAGE Publication.
McGregor D (2006) The human side of eanterprise-Annotated edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Nugroho R (2008) Public policy. Jakarta: PT Elev Media Komputindo.
Omer J (2013) Determinant of institutional quality: a case study of IMF programme countries. MPRA Paper No 51344. 11 November 2013.
Pulzl H & Treib O (2006) Implementing public policy. Dalam: Frank F, Miler GJ, Sidney MS. Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics and Methods. New York: CRC Press. 89-108.
Rosyadi S & Sobandi KR (2014) Relasi kuasa antara perhutani dan masyarakat dalam pengelolaan sumberdaya hutan di Banyumas: kepentingan bisnis VS community empowerment. Jurnal Komunitas Vol 6 No.1:46-55.
Scott WR (1995) Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Scott WR (2001) Institutions and Organizations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Scott WR & Christensen (1995) The Institutional Construction of Organizations: International and Longitudinal Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tompkins JR (2005) Organization Theory and Public Management. Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth,.
Uphoff N (1986) Local Institutional Development: An Analytical Sourcebook with Cases. Colorado: Kumarian Press.
Wallis J & Dollery B (2002) Social capital and local government capacity. Australian Journal of Public Administration 61(3):76-85.
Copyright of this journal is possession of Editorial Board and Journal Manager, by the knowledge of the author, while the moral right of the publication belongs to the author.
The formal legal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA), implies that publication can be used for non-commercial purposes in its original form (cannot be modified).
Every publication (printed/electronic) are open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.
