Analisis HACCP Pada UKM Minuman Siap Saji Aloe Vera (ALOJA) Sebagai Sarana Memenuhi Standar Produksi Pangan Yang Baik
Downloads
Background: BPOM stated that in 2017, small and micro food enterprises were responsible for 49,5 % food borne disease in Indonesia. Indonesian government had provided guidance about good handling standard for food product (GMP) by UU No.18 Tahun 2012. ALOJA as Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) had lot of limitation to meet the standard. HACCP analysis was needed to give recommendation in arranging SOP that meet the standard.
Objectives: The objective of this research was to do and set HACCP analysis as a way to collect data to give recommendation in setting the SOP that meet food safety standard regulation.
Methods: Research done by applying 7 of 14 steps in HACCP implementation. Judgment taken based on the level of severity (3 level) and level of occurrence probability (3 level). From the matrix derived from it, SOP recommendation was taken if the level of control was medium and above.
Results: Recommendation given for Pest Control procedure, washing and dipping, cooling, packaging and sealing process.
Conclusions: The result shown that pest control procedure, washing and dipping, cooling, packaging and sealing process was on medium risk or above. SOP recommendation done by adding nylon net sized 80 mesh and check it regularly, control the concentration of lime betel, limit and regulate the cooling room strictly, and to apply aseptic condition. If this not possible, the best option was to apply washing hand and feet procedure with soap/hand sanitizer, masker, cover the hair of worker during packaging and sealing.
ABSTRAK
Latar Belakang: Pada tahun 2017 BPOM menyebutkan bahwa Industri Kecil Makanan berkontribusi terhadap 49,5% kasus keracunan pangan di Indonesia. Pemerintah melalui UU No. 18 Tahun 2012 telah mengatur mengenai prosedur pengolahan pangan yang baik (CPPB). ALOJA sebagai UKM produsen minuman siap saji Aloe vera memiliki keterbatasan dalam sarana-prasarana dan SDM sehingga pemenuhan standar produksi pangan yang baik sulit untuk diterapkan. Analisis HACCP perlu diterapkan untuk memberikan masukan dalam penyusunan SOP dalam alur produksinya sehingga memenuhi standar produksi pangan yang baik.
Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melakukan analisis dan menetapkan aturan HACCP sebagai bahan rekomendasi dalam penyusunan SOP yang memenuhi persyaratan standar produksi pangan yang baik.
Metode: Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah dengan menerapkan 7 dari 14 langkah dalam HACCP. Metode penilaian didasarkan pada keparahan (Severity) skala tiga dan tingkat kemungkinan terjadinya (probability) skala 3. Rekomendasi SOP disusun pada resiko medium hingga tinggi yang diperoleh dari matriks severity vs probability.
Hasil: Dalam analisis HACCP ini ditemukan bahwa tahap yang masih memiliki resiko menengah ke atas adalah tahap pengendalian hama, pencucian dan perendaman, pendinginan, dan pengemasan-penyegelan. Rekomendasi yang diberikan adalah dengan menambahkan jala nilon ukuran 80 mesh pada ventilasi udara dan melakukan pengecekan rutin terhadap kondisi jala nilon pengontrolan konsentrasi kapur sirih yang digunakan, dengan menyusun regulasi yang ketat untuk ruang pendinginan,dan penerapan kondisi aseptis atau minimal dengan adanya penyuci hama untuk tangan, masker, penutup kepala, apron yang bersih, dan kaki yang bersih.
Kesimpulan: Rekomendasi SOP diberikan pada proses pengendalian hama, pencucian dan perendaman, pendinginan, dan pengemasan-penyegelan.
WHO (World Health Organisation). World Health Day 2015: Food Safety. https://www.who.int/campaigns/world-health-day/2015/fact-sheet.pdf (2015).
BPOM (Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan). Laporan Tahunan 2016. (2016).
BPOM (Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan). Laporan Tahunan 2017. https://www.pom.go.id/new/admin/dat/20180710/Laporan Tahunan BPOM 2017.pdf (2017).
Presiden Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia No. 18 Tahun 2012. http://www.bulog.co.id/dokumen/pp/PP_17_2015_KPG.pdf (2012).
BPOM (Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan). Peraturan Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan Nomor 31 Tahun 2018 Mengenai Label Pangan Olahan. (2018).
Weinroth, M. D., Belk, A. D. & Belk, K. E. History, development, and current status of food safety systems worldwide. Anim. Front. 8, 9–15 (2018).
Zaida, T. J. The development of a safety and quality culture assessment tool from a longitudinal, mixed-method research journey. Worldw. Hosp. Tour. Themes 10, 313–329 (2018).
Cusato, S. et al. Assessing the costs involved in the implementation of GMP and HACCP in a small dairy factory. Qual. Assur. Saf. Crop. Foods 6, 135–139 (2014).
Doménech, E., Amorós, J. A., Pérez-Gonzalvo, M. & Escriche, I. Implementation and effectiveness of the HACCP and pre-requisites in food establishments. Food Control 22, 1419–1423 (2011).
Arpanutud, P., Keeratipibul, S., Charoensupaya, A. & Taylor, E. Factors influencing food safety management system adoption in Thai food-manufacturing firms: Model development and testing. Br. Food J. 111, 364–375 (2009).
Teves, K. L. Y. HAZARD ANALYSIS CRITICAL CONTROL POINT (HACCP) CERTIFICATION OF MICRO AND SMALL SCALE FOOD COMPANIES IN THE PHILIPPINES. MATTER Int. J. Sci. Technol. 2, (2016).
Dzwolak, W. HACCP in small food businesses – The Polish experience. Food Control 36, 132–137 (2014).
Garayoa, R., Vitas, A., Díez-Leturia, M. & García-Jalón, I. Food safety and the contract catering companies: Food handlers, facilities and HACCP evaluation. Food Control 22, 2006–2012 (2011).
Green, R. & Kane, K. The effective enforcement of HACCP based food safety management systems in the UK. Food Control 37, 257–262 (2014).
Karagozlu, N., Karagozlu, C. & Ergönül, B. A model HACCP plan for small-scale manufacturing of tarhana (a traditional Turkish fermented food). Bulg. J. Agric. Sci. 15, 501–513 (2009).
Wallace, C., Holyoak, L., Powell, S. & Dykes, F. Re-thinking the HACCP team: An investigation into HACCP team knowledge and decision-making for successful HACCP development. Food Res. Int. - FOOD RES INT 47, (2012).
(a, Y., Sulieman, A. M., (a, A. M., Houceine, B. & Salghi, R. Exploring Idiosyncrasies and Potentialities of HACCP Team Across the Sharjah Food Industry, UAE. Mor. J. Chem. 3 N°1 136-141 3, 136–141 (2015).
Anandappa, A. Evaluating Food Safety Systems Development and Implementation by Quantifying HACCP Training Durability. (2013).
Kausar, H., Parveen, S., Saeed, S., Ishfaq, B., & Ali, M. A. Development and standardization of ready to serve Aloe vera lemon functional drink. J. Environ. Sci. Toxicol. Food Technol. 10, 44–52 (2016).
Sasikumar, R. Preparation of therapeutic RTS beverage from aloe vera gel and aonla fruit juice and evaluation of storage stability. Asian J. Dairy Food Res. 34, 151 (2015).
BPOM (Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan). Peraturan Kepala BPOM RI No. HK.03.1.23.04.12.2206 Tahun 2012 Tentang Cara Produksi Pangan Yang Baik Untuk Industri Rumah Tangga. http://jdih.pom.go.id/showpdf.php?u=HzfTWcVRSEozXrbdVtEwFVOWM5%2BIRyY9TI%2BpEmsAHJI%3D. (2012).
Sutton, S. The environmental monitoring program in a GMP environment. J. GXP Compliance 14, 22–30 (2010).
BSN (Badan Standardisasi Nasional). SNI 7388:2009 Mengenai Batas Maksimum Cemaran Mikroba dalam Pangan. (2009).
Yunus, R; Syam, H. Pengaruh persentase dan lama perendaman dalam larutan kapur sirih Ca (OH)2 terhadap kualitas keripik pepaya (Carica papaya L.) dengan vacuum frying. J. Pendidik. Teknol. Pertan. 3, 221–233 (2018).
FAO (Food and Agriculture Oranisazation). Food Handler Manual: Instructor. (2017).
AMERTA NUTR by Unair is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
3. The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC BY-SA).
4. The Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC BY-SA) license allows re-distribution and re-use of a licensed work on the conditions that the creator is appropriately credited and that any derivative work is made available under "the same, similar or a compatible license”. Other than the conditions mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.
