Tata Kelola Kompetensi Guru
Downloads
Abstract
The world is changing and developing so fast as technology changes and information becomes increasingly sophisticated. The changing times must be balanced with the development of education in a more advanced direction. Kemdikbud as a government institution has duties and functions in providing public services in the field of education. The Ministry of Education and Culture must have good teacher governance. Efforts were made for teacher governance. Laws related to teachers were issued, one of which was the 2005 Teacher and Lecturer Law. Development of a teacher management information system. Provision of tuition assistance funds for teachers to improve academic qualifications to meet the minimum standard of S1. Teacher professional education organized by universities to obtain educator certificates. Continuing Professional Development (CPD) program so that teachers maintain and develop their competence. Until now the quality of teachers is still low. The main problems for teachers are sub-standard competence, academic qualifications that do not meet the requirements, and teachers who are not certified educators. Identification of factors that influence teacher competence is very important as a reference for making teacher governance policy decisions. Several factors influence teacher competency. The Ministry of Education and Culture seeks to realize better teacher competency governance. Ministry of Education and Culture is dynamically changing and how it always develops knowledge to solve problems and make innovations. The management of teacher competence is carried out in collaboration with the involvement of other actors such as district/city/provincial education offices, universities and related ministries/institutions.
Abstrak
Dunia berubah dan berkembang begitu cepat seiring perubahan teknologi dan informasi yang semakin canggih. Perubahan zaman harus diimbangi dengan perkembangan pendidikan ke arah yang lebih maju. Kemdikbud sebagai lembaga pemerintah mempunyai tugas dan fungsi dalam memberikan layanan publik dalam bidang Pendidikan. Kemdikbud harus mempunyai tata kelola guru yang baik. Upaya-upaya dilakukan untuk tata kelola guru. Diterbitkan perundang-undangan terkait guru, salah satunya UU Guru dan Dosen tahun 2005. Pengembangan sistem informasi manajemen guru. Penyediaan dana bantuan biaya pendidikan bagi guru untuk meningkatkan kualifikasi akademik untuk memenuhi standar minimum S1. Pendidikan profesi guru yang diselenggarakan oleh universitas untuk mendapatkan sertifikat pendidik. Program Continuing Profesional Development (CPD) agar guru mempertahankan dan mengembangkan kompetensinya. Hingga saat ini kualitas guru masih rendah. Masalah utama guru, yaitu kompetensi di bawah standar, kualifikasi akademik yang tidak memenuhi syarat, dan guru yang belum bersertifikat pendidik. Identifikasi faktor yang mempengaruhi kompetensi guru sangat penting sebagai acuan pengambilan keputusan kebijakan tata kelola guru. Beberapa faktor mempengaruhi kompetensi guru. Kemdikbud berupaya mewujudkan tata kelola kompetensi guru yang lebih baik. Kemdikbud secara dinamis berubah dan bagaimana selalu mengembangkan pengetahuan untuk menyelesaikan masalah dan membuat inovasi. Tata kelola kompetensi guru dilakukan dengan kerjasama pelibatan aktor lain seperti dinas pendidikan kabupaten/kota/ provinsi, universitas dan kementerian/ lembaga terkait.
Alawiyah, F. (2018). Problematika tata kelola guru dalam implementasi undang-undang guru dan dosen. Aspirasi: Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Sosial, 9(1), 118-140.
Allen, W., Hyde, M., Whannel, R., & O'Neill, M. (2018). Teacher reform in Indonesia: Can offshore programs create lasting pedagogical shift? Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 46(1), 22–37.
Anif, S. (2015). Pengembangan model peningkatan kompetensi profesional guru biologi berbasis continuous professional development (CPD) di Surakarta. University Research Colloquium, ISSN 2407-9189.
Bernard, C. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.
Bevir, M. (2011). Governance. California: The Sage Handbook.
Boyatzis, R. E., Stubbs, E., & Taylor, S. (2002). Learning cognitive and emotional
intelligence competencies through graduate management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 1(2), 150-162.
Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Bloomberg, L. (2014). Publik value governance: moving beyond traditional publik administration and the new publik management. Publik Administration Review,Vol. 74, Iss. 4, pp. 445–456.
Chang, M. C., Shaeffer, S., Al-Samarrai, S., Ragatz, A. B., de Ree, J., & Stevenson, R. (2014). Teacher reform in Indonesia: The role of politics and evidence in policy making. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Chhotray, V. & Stroker, G. (2009). Governance theory and practice: A cross-disciplinary approach. New York: Macmillan.
Chochran, C. L., & Malone, E. F. (1995). Publik policy: Perspectives and choices. California: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Epstein, R. M., & Hundert, E. M. (2002). Defining and assessing professional competence. Journal of The American Medical Association, 287, 226–235.
Farazmand, A. (2012). Citizens through collaborative organizations. Publik Organization Review, 12, 223-241.
Grindle, M. S. (2007). Good enough governance revisited. Development Policy Review, 2007, 25 (5): 553-574.
Handayani, T., & Sukarno, M. (2010). Implementation of the compulsory nine-year basic education program: opportunities and constraints at household and community level. Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities, 2, 191-202.
Hanushek, E. A, & Rivkin, S. G. (2010). Generalizations about using value-added measures of teacher quality. American Economic Review, 100 , 267–271.
Hattie, A. C. J. (2002). Classroom position and peer effects. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 449–48.
Hattie, A. C. J. (1999). Influences on student learning. Inaugural Lecture: Professor of Education University of Auckland, 2nd August.
Hood, C. (1995). The new publik management in the 1990s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20 (2–3): 93–109.
Hood, C. (1991). A publik management for all seasons?. Publik Administration, 69: 3–19.
Johansson, S., Strietholt, R., Rosén, M., & Myrberg, E. (2014). Valid inferences of teachers' judgements of pupils' reading literacy: Does formal teacher competence matter?School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 25(3), 394-407.
Joppe de, R. K., Pradhan, M. M., & Rogers, H. (2016). Double for nothing? experimental evidence on the impact of an unconditional teacher salary increase on student performance in Indonesia. World Bank Report.
Kaslow, N. J., Borden, K. A., Collins, F. L., Forrest, L., Illfelder-Kaye, J., & Nelson, P. (2004). Competencies conference: Future directions in education and credentialing in professional psychology. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 60, 699–712.
Mahdiasyah. (2018). Evaluasi pelaksanaan sistem penilaian hasil belajar siswa (studi kasus di enam kota). Jurnal Penelitian Kebijakan Pendidikan, 11(2), 48-63.
Maralani, V. (2008). The changing relationship between family size and educational attainment over the course of socioeconomic development: evidence from Indonesia. Demography, 45(3), 693-717.
McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for Intelligence. The American Psychologist, 28 (1), 1–14.
Muizz, M. (2017. Implementasi pendidikan dan pelatihan dalam meningkatkan kompetensi guru di MTs Negeri 2 Bandar Lampung (tesis Master). http://repository.radenintan.ac.id/2115/.
Nair, P. (2012). A study on identifying teaching competencies and factors affecting teaching competencies with special reference to mba institutes in Gujarat (disertasi Doktor). http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/jspui/bitstream/ 10603/ 206444/17/thesis-%20preeti%20nair.pdf.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1994). The wise company: How companies create continuous innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Novauli, F. (2012). Pengaruh kompetensi terhadap peningkatan prestasi belajar pada SMPN di Kota Banda Aceh. Jurnal Pencerahan, 6(1), 17-32.
Novianti, K. (2010). Analisis trend dan dampak pengiriman TKI: Kasus dua desa di Lombok Timur, Nusa Tenggara Barat. Jurnal Kependudukan Indonesia, V(1), 15-39.
Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects?. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26 (3), 237-257.
Osborne, S. P. (2010). The new publik governance: Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice publik governance. New York: Routledge.
Rohman, A. & Hardianto, W. T. (2019). Reformasi birokrasi dan good governance. Malang: Intrans Publising.
Santoro, N ., Reid, J. , Mayer, D., & Singh, M. (2012) Producing ‘quality' teachers: The role of teacher professional standards. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education , 40(1), 1-3.
Saripudin. (2014). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kompetensi profesional guru bidang kompetensi keahlian teknik instalasi tenaga listrik di SMK Politeknik TEDC Bandung. INVOTEC, X(1), 67- 88.
Sharma, S. (2010). Perceived leadership capacities of Malaysian principals. International Journal of Educational Administration, 2(3), 335-348.
Spencer, L. & Spencer, S. (1993). Competence at work.Canada: Jhon Wiley &Sons Inc.
Suhartini, E. (2011). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kompetensi
guru pada SMK RSBI di Kabupaten Indramayu (tesis Master). http://lib.ui.ac.id/file?file=digital/20297748-T29787%20-20Analisis%20 faktor.pdf.
Tambunan, H. (2014). Faktors affecting teachers' competence in the field of information technology. International Education Studies; 7(12), 70-75.
Thair, M., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). A brief history of science teacher professional development initiative in Indonesia and the implications for centralised teacher development. International Journal of Educational Development, 23, 201–213. doi:10.1016/S0738-0593(02)00014-7.
Uzer Usman. (2002). Menjadi guru profesional. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.
Wangid & Pingge. (2016). Faktor yang mempengaruhi hasil belajar siswa Sekolah Dasar di Kecamatan Kota Tambolaka. JPSD: Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, 2(1). 146-147.
Copyright (c) 2022 Author
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Governance and Administrative Reform by Unair is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
3. The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC BY-SA).
