Focus and Scope

The aim of J. kim. ris is to facilitate publication of chemistry research article. Articles of J. kim. ris must contain a research topic in chemistry as identity of the journal content. The Journal coverages some topics :

1. Research topic of natural product and synthesis of material chemistry for medicinal materials, energy and environment
2. Study of chemical processes in living cells such as isolation, purification and modification of biomolecules compound and application development
3. Chemical study of theory, design models using computational approaches chemistry and molecular dynamics simulations, as well as the study of environmental chemistry
4. Design, development and validation of analytical methods
5. Development of chemical technologies for solving problems in the fields of medical, pharmaceutical, agricultural, industrial and other

 

Section Policies

Articles

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Manuscripts submitted to Jurnal Kimia Riset must pass a plagiarism check and will be reviewed by two reviewers with a double-blind policy. If the two reviewers provide contradictory recommendations, the editor will invite a third reviewer to the review process. The final decision will be determined by the Editor based on the recommendations of the reviewers.

 

Publication Frequency

 The J. kim. ris is arranged to be published twice per year.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes CLOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration.

 

 

Plagiarism Screening

The J. kim. ris. maintain the highest standards of academic integrity. All submitted manuscripts must be free from any plagiarism. The Editorial Board of J. kim. ris will carefully review the similarity of each submitted manuscript using Turnitin software. Manuscripts with a similarity index higher than 20% will be returned to the authors for revision and resubmission. Authors are required to obtain written permission to reproduce any copyrighted material (figures, tables, text, etc.), and such permission must be acknowledged appropriately in the manuscript (e.g., in the Acknowledgement section). Authors should be aware that any plagiarism, i.e. self-plagiarism, verbatim copying, and improper citation, is strictly prohibited. If plagiarism is discovered after publication, the Editorial Board reserves the right to retract the article immediately and notify relevant indexing bodies and institutions. By submitting to this journal, authors confirm that their work is original, properly cited, and ethically prepared.

Guide for Author

Jurnal Kimia Riset (J. kim. ris) has a rule for manuscript writing. The manuscript is written with Microsoft Word software in document format (.doc or .docx), using the font type of Times New Roman size 12, spacing 1.5, on A4 paper size format, with the top and left margin of 3 cm while the right and bottom edges of 2.5 cm. The abstract should be typed in a single space. 

Structure

The manuscript should be written in the structure below:

• Title
• Abstract, not more than 200 words (single spacing)
• Introduction
• Material and Method
• Results and Discussion
• Conclusion
• Acknowledgmentnt
• References

 

The main parts in bold letters without numbering (eg, Abstract, Introduction), being the main subpart, can use the numbering 1,2, and 3 or a, b, and c.

 

Title

1. Title of the article (not to exceed 20 words). The title should be written in English
2. Name of the author and affiliation (institution). The primary author responsible for correspondence is marked with an asterisk (*), then with the email address particulars

 

Abstract

The abstract should be concise, maximum of 200 words, single-spaced and written in English. The abstract summarizes the research purposes, results, and main conclusions. Avoid the use of writing references in the abstract and unusual abbreviations. Please complete the abstract with keywords, with 3-6 words, used for indexing and tracking information. The keywords should have the right words, so people can find related articles by entering a keyword in the search.

 

Introduction

An introduction should be written in brief and concise, containing a description of the theory behind the research, the study of contemporary expression, the expression problem to be solved, objectives, and hypotheses of the study. This section is used to write the research background. Please attach the references in the section.

 

Material and Method

In this section, the author should reveal the type of sample used, tools, and materials that are specifically used in the study. Besides, it should also include the behavior or procedure performed in research work. Adaptation of the procedure has been used, is done by calling the adapted reference, and does not need rewriting. If there is modification procedures, the types of modifications need to be written down in detail.

 

Results and Discussion

In this section, authors should disclose the results of the research and explanation or intrepretasinya be concise, clear, and concise. Results can be presented in the form of images, tables, or curves, to clarify the results. Description and discussion of the results can be presented in a separate section or combined as needed. Discussion conducted should explain the freshness of the research conducted, not an explanation of the procedures or repetition of existing research.

 

Conclusion

This section states the findings of the study based on the results of research and discussion. Conclusions should be presented briefly and clearly

 

Acknowledgments

it should be conveyed to the person, institution, or other entity that actually supports the research and not addressed to the members of researchers who are directly involved in the research.

 

Appendix

Research-supporting data can be included separately from the main article as an attachment, such as video files, computer simulation files, and datasets.

 

Symbols and Mathematical Equations

Symbols and mathematical equations used to be vouched for by the authors by the norm contained in the rules of science. All the equations listed in the text should be numbered consecutively.

 

Figure

All images, including pictures included in the text, should be numbered and given a title that describes their contents. The photo required for zoom made a resolution of at least 300 dpi. The title is a typed image to be centered and placed at the bottom of the image. The title image in bold, while the caption is not. Example: Figure 1. The growth curve of E. coli. Phase lag, 0-4; death phase, 24-30, etc.

 

Table

All the tables listed in the text should be numbered and given a title that describes the table's contents. The table is shown with a horizontal line in the header (first line) and the end of the course, with no vertical lines. The title is typed table centered and laid on the table.

 

  

References 

References in the text

• If the cited article consists of one or two authors, then all author names are written down. Example: (Smith, 1990); or (Purkan & Abdulloh, 2007)
• If more than two authors, only the first author who wrote, while others are abbreviated by et al. are in italics. Example: (Purkan et al., 2008)

 

References List

It is arranged alphabetically, containing all the libraries listed in the text. References that are not listed in the text are not allowed to be written.

 

The writing guide for references from journal sources

Bertrand T, Eady AJN, Jones NJ, Jesmin, Nagy MJ, JN Gregoire, Rave LE, Brown K., 2004, Crystal Structure of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Catalase-Peroxidase, J. Biol. Chem, 279 (37); 38991-38999

 

Book sources

Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, and Maniatis T., 1989, Molecular Cloning A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, USA; 53-76

 

WEB Sources

Becker, 2001, Conservation's Prairie Farmers Reap Rewards. The New York Times, http://www.nytimes.com, Retrieved August 27.2008

 

Cost

The author will be charged IDR 750,000 for domestic authors  or 100 USD for foreign authors. In each publication, the author will receive a copy of the submission in print form and two print detachment.

Open Access Statement

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Article Processing Charge

Articles accepted after peer review are subject to an article processing charge (APC) of IDR 750,000 (domestic authors) or 100 USD (international authors). Peer review, copyediting, typesetting, and journal administrative expenses are covered by this APC. Article submission is free of charge. APC payments are only made through the Virtual Account of the Rector of Universitas Airlangga: 8966800000001496 (Bank Mandiri).

Publication Ethics

Publication Ethic Statement

The J. kim. ris is committed to upholding the highest ethical standards throughout the entire scholarly publishing process.  Our ethical guidelines are customised to correspond with the unique attributes of our journal's focus and scope, as well as the duties and responsibilities of our primary stakeholders: authors, reviewers, editors, and readers. This ethical statement has been customized in accordance with internationally recognised standards, such as:

Journal Editors' COPE Best Practice Guidelines

COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers

International Standards for Authors: Responsible Research Publication

Ethics Guidelines for Elsevier Publishing

Universitas Airlangga, as the publisher of J. kim. ris, will make every effort to ensure that every stage of publication runs smoothly and on time. Universitas Airlangga guarantees that any revenue-generating activity has no impact or influence on editorial decisions.

For Authors

1. Authors are expected to provide a truthful and precise data of their research, including an impartial interpretation of the results. All data and findings must be clearly and accurately presented within the submitted manuscript. Adequate information and references should be added in the manuscript to ensure reproducibility of the study. Any form of data fabrication, falsification, or deliberate misrepresentation is considered unethical and will not be tolerated.
2. All required documents, which are available for distribution, must be completed and uploaded by the author.
3. Authors, through the corresponding author, are expected to be actively involved in the peer review process. All comments and input from peer reviewers on submitted manuscripts should be responded appropriately. By adhering to established editorial and ethical standards, the authors uphold the integrity of their research and guarantee responsible publication practices.
4. Authors must ensure that their submissions are entirely their own work. Any material, ideas, or wording derived from external sources should be properly acknowledged through accurate citation or quotation.
5. Authors should be informed that the Turnitin software will be used to screen similarity of all manuscripts submitted to the J. kim. ris. Manuscripts with a similarity percentage of 20% or higher will be returned to the authors for revision and resubmission to the J. kim. ris.
6. Authors should generally refrain from publishing articles that describe essentially the same study in multiple journals or primary publications. Submitting an identical manuscript to multiple journals simultaneously constitutes unethical publication conduct.
7. Authors are responsible for giving proper credit to all data sources used in their research and for citing any previous works that have significantly influenced their study. Recognizing the contributions of others in a proper manner is an essential aspect of ethical research practice.
8. Authorship of the manuscript: Authorship should be limited to individuals who have made a substantial contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. It is imperative that all individuals who have made substantial contributions be included as co-authors. The corresponding author is responsible for ensuring that all individuals who have made a substantial contribution are included in the submitted manuscript and that no inappropriate co-authors are included. Additionally, the corresponding author should ensure that all co-authors have reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript and have consented to its submission for publication.
9. Disclosures and conflicts of interest: Authors must disclose any financial or other conflict of interest in the manuscript that could influence the results, its intepretation or findings of the manuscript submitted to J. kim. ris. Additionaly, all financial support received by authors in carrying out the project or experiments should be clearly stated in the manuscript.
10. Approval by the ethics committee: Authors must submit an official declaration issued by the ethics commission if the study reported in the manuscript involves humans or animals. Authors must ensure maximum reduction in animal suffering during each stage of the experiment involving animals. The acquisition and care of animals must follow to the guidelines outlined in the NIH Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
11. Fundamental Errors in Published Works: The authors responsible to notify the Editor-in-Chief or publisher of J. kim. ris and collaborate to retract or rectify the manuscript when an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in their own published work, promptly.
12. Manuscript withdrawal and retraction: Authors who intend to withdraw a submitted manuscript must send an official email request to the Editor-in-Chief before the review process starts. Once the manuscript has entered or completed the review stage, withdrawal cannot be approved. If plagiarism or any form of academic misconduct is identified after publication, J. kim. ris will act in accordance with the Web of Science (WoS) policies described in the “Retractions, Corrections, and Expressions of Concern” section. These measures are also in full agreement with COPE’s Retraction Guidelines and it is required to adhere to the protocols of COPE.

 

For Peer Reviewers

1. Each manuscript is evaluated through a double-blind review system, in which the identities of the authors and reviewers remain undisclosed to one another. This approach preserves confidentiality on both sides and promotes an impartial review based solely on the quality of the submission.
2. Confidentiality: Every manuscript submitted to J. kim. ris for review must be handled with the utmost discretion. Reviewers are expected to treat the manuscript as private and must not share or discuss it with anyone unless they have received explicit authorization from the editor.
3. Contribution to editorial decisions: Peer reviewer assists the editor in making editorial decisions and, through editorial communications with the author, may also help the author improve the paper.
4. Standards of objectivity: Reviews should be conducted in an objective manner. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Peer reviewers should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
5. Promptness: Any selected peer reviewers who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.
6. Acknowledging sources: Peer reviewers should identify relevant published work that the authors have not cited. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.
7. Disclosure and conflicts of interest: All information about manuscripts under review must remain confidential and not be utilised for personal advantage. Peer reviewers must refrain from accepting review requests for articles that could present conflicts of interest due to competitive, collaborative, or other affiliations.

 

For Editors

1. Editors must ensure that all manuscripts submitted are within the aims and scope of J. kim. ris.
2. Confidentiality: Editors and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
3. Disclosures and conflicts of interest: Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in the Editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
4. Manuscript review: Editors of J. kim. ris. bear the responsibility of overseeing the peer review process with integrity, fairness, and confidentiality. Editors should provide clear and transparent guidance regarding the review procedures, including which sections of the manuscript will be evaluated by reviewers for the authors. In selecting reviewers, editors must ensure that candidates for peer review have the relevant expertise and that any possible conflicts of interest are carefully identified and avoided.
5. Fair play: Editors at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
6. Publication decisions: Editors of J. kim. ris is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the J. kim. ris should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the editorial board and constrained by any applicable legal requirements regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

 

For Readers

Readers can give feedback to the journal on ethical issues or errors in published work. J. kim. ris will take this feedback seriously.