Development and Validity of Fluid Intelligence Test Based on Cattle-Horn-Carrol Theory: A Pilot Project
Unduhan
This study aimed to examine the validity of the Fluid Intelligence Test, constructed based on the Cattel-Horn-Carroll theory. There were two sources of validity used in this study, which were evidence based on the internal structure and evidence based on relation with other variables. Sixty-four items have been composed and tested to 242 people. The data was analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis technique and correlations technique to examine test validity. The result of this study showed that the prepared model worked quite well in describing the narrow abilities of fluid intelligence, as showed by the receipt of fit indexes accuracy of the model, such as Chi-Square value .42 (p = .518), Goodness Fit Index (GFI) = 1, and Rooted Mean Square Error (RMSEA) = .00. Similar result was also showed by its correlation with other variables, which are .717 (TIKI) and .606 (CFIT). This suggested that Fluid Intelligence Test has good validity.
Azwar, S. (1999). Pengantar Psikologi Inteligensi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar Offset.
Carrol, J. B. (1993). Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of factor Analysis Studies. Australia: Cambridge University Press.
Cattell, R. B. (1941). Some theoretical issues in adult intelligence testing. Psychological Bulletin, 38(592), 10.
Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: their structure, growth and action. Oxford: Houghton Mifflin.
Gregory, R. J. (2013). Tes Psikologi: Sejarah, Prinsip dan Aplikasi. Edisi 6. Terj. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Horn, J. L. (1968). Organization of Abilities and The Development of Intelligence. Psychological Review, 75(3), 242-259.
McGrew, K. S. (1997). Analysis of the major intelligence batteries according to a proposed comprehensive Gf-Gc framework. Dalam D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Ed.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp. 151–179). New York: Guilford.
McGrew, K. S. (2005). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities: Past, present, and future. Dalam D. P. Flanagan & P. L. Harrison (Ed.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.
Thorndike, R. L. & Hagen, E. (1955). Measurement and Evaluation in Psychology and Education. New York: John Willey and Sons.
Wechsler, D. (1958). The Measurement and Appraisal of Adult Intelligence
Wilson, R. S. (1974). Twins: Mental development in the preschool years. Developmental Psychology, 10(4), 580.
INSAN Jurnal Psikologi dan Kesehatan Mental adalah terbitan berkala dengan prinsip Akses Terbuka dan Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0) sehingga hak cipta tetap berada di tangan penulis.
Dengan lisensi ini, siapapun berhak menggunakan informasi dan melakukan re-distribusi konten yang dimuat dalam jurnal ini untuk kepentingan apapun, termasuk kepentingan komersial. Hal tersebut dapat dilakukan selama memenuhi dua ketentuan, yaitu; (1) Anda harus memberikan atribusi dengan mengutip sumber aslinya serta menjelaskan segala perubahan yang dibuat; dan (2) Anda tidak diperbolehkan melakukan pembatasan, baik pembatasan legal maupun hambatan teknologi, sehingga orang lain dapat memiliki hak distribusi yang sama.
Redaksi jurnal tidak akan meminta penulis untuk melakukan persetujuan transfer hak cipta atas semua naskah yang diterbitkan.
