Expectancy Violations on Perception in the Residential Setting: An Experimental Study
Downloads
Perception is influenced by four factors; beliefs, values, social influence and expectations. Expectations which affect perceptions are divided into two; expectancy violations and expectancy non-violations. There is a difference in reaction time in perception when expectations match and when they do not match with reality. Treatment was given to a group of 78 college students, in the form of giving perceptions and expectations. Within participants post-test only design was used to see the difference in reaction times of the two treatments. Expectancy violations have a significant influence on the perception time of the participants. This can be caused by past experience which formed expectations, as well as the room layout in the partisipants' own residence.
Afifi, W. A., & Metts, S. (1998). Characteristics and Consequences of Expectancy violations in Close Relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(3), 365–392. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407598153004
Botes, A. (2020). Learning to Expect the Predictable: The Role of Expectation in the Cognitive Control of Attention [Open Access Te Herenga Waka-Victoria University of Wellington]. https://doi.org/10.26686/wgtn.17148176
Caplette, L., Gosselin, F., Mermillod, M., & Wicker, B. (2020). Real-world expectations and their affective value modulate object processing. NeuroImage, 213, 116736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116736
Casey, B. J., Thomas, K. M., Welsh, T. F., Badgaiyan, R. D., Eccard, C. H., Jennings, J. R., & Crone, E. A. (2000). Dissociation of response conflict, attentional selection, and expectancy with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 97(15), 8728–8733. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.15.8728
Coon, D., & Mitterer, J. O. (2015). Introduction to Psychology: Gateways to Mind and Behavior. Cengage Learning. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=-4jCBAAAQBAJ
Farmer, T. A., & Matlin, M. W. (2019). Cognition (10th edition). Wiley.
Gronau, N., Neta, M., & Bar, M. (2008). Integrated contextual representation for objects' identities and their locations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(3), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20027
Joubert, O. R., Fize, D., Rousselet, G. A., & Fabre-Thorpe, M. (2008). Early interference of context congruence on object processing in rapid visual categorization of natural scenes. Journal of Vision, 8(13), 11–11. https://doi.org/10.1167/8.13.11
Lauer, T., Willenbockel, V., Maffongelli, L., & Víµ, M. L.-H. (2020). The influence of scene and object orientation on the scene consistency effect. Behavioural Brain Research, 394, 112812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2020.112812
Mulyani, T. H. (2005). Arsitektur Ekologis. Kanisius. Yogyakarta.
Myers, D. G., & DeWall, C. N. (2020). Psychology in Modules (Thirteenth edition). Worth Publishers.
Pinquart, M., Endres, D., Teige-Mocigemba, S., Panitz, C., & Schütz, A. C. (2021). Why expectations do or do not change after expectancy violations: A comparison of seven models. Consciousness and Cognition, 89, 103086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2021.103086
Pinquart, M., Rothers, A., Gollwitzer, M., Khosrowtaj, Z., Pietzsch, M., & Panitz, C. (2021). Predictors of Coping With Expectancy violations: An Integrative Review. Review of General Psychology, 25(3), 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/10892680211024123
Rémy, F., Vayssière, N., Pins, D., Boucart, M., & Fabre-Thorpe, M. (2014). Incongruent object/context relationships in visual scenes: Where are they processed in the brain? Brain and Cognition, 84(1), 34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2013.10.008
Rief, W., & Anna Glombiewski, J. (2017). The role of expectations in mental disorders and their treatment. World Psychiatry : Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 16(2), 210–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20427
Riener, C. (2019). New Approaches and Debates on Top-Down Perceptual Processing. Teaching of Psychology, 46, 267–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628319853943
Tang, D., Chen, X., Li, H., & Lei, Y. (2022). Distributional analyses reveal the individual differences in congruency sequence effect. PLOS ONE, 17(8), e0272621. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272621
Zhao, P. & Kun Yan. (2022). "Not as attractive and communicatively competent as I expected”: The effects of expectancy violations on relational outcomes during modality switching in online dating. Computers in Human Behavior, 131, 107203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107203
Copyright (c) 2023 Yasmin Nursyabina Bakri, Izzatush Shafa Aina, Amira Rasyanda Alifa, Keshia Ezra, Zharifa Anisa Widiyansari, Wilis Srisayekti, Risa Dwi Ratnasari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
INSAN Jurnal Psikologi dan Kesehatan Mental is a periodical journal publisher with Open Access principles and Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0); therefore, the copyright remains with the author.
With this license, anyone has the right to use any information and re-distribute the content of this journal for any purposes, including commercial purposes. This can be done as long as the person satisfies the following two conditions; (1) the person is obliged to provide a proper attribution by citing the original source and indicate any changes they have made; and (2) the person is strictly not allowed to make any restrictions, both legal and technological limitations, that restrict others to have the same level of distribution rights.
The manuscript copyright remains with the author; therefore, INSAN JPKM do not and will not request for copyright transfer on all published manuscripts in INSAN JPKM.
