The use of social media among Indonesia's Migrant Workers (IMWs)
Downloads
Netizens often use social media as a medium for activism, including Indonesia's Migrant Workers (IMWs). Social media with networked characteristics has succeeded in lifting narratives in particular groups that have not been heard a lot and have escaped mainstream media scrutiny. Starting from the development of communication between IMWs, we raise the extent to which IMWs use social media as a medium for social activism, especially for IMWs protection issues and social media's main content uploaded IMWs. This study aims to analyze to what extent social media is used by IMWs for social activism related to issues concerning the protection of migrant workers and what influences their behavior when using social media. We use a social media activism framework within the social media platform. Researchers collected data from March-October 2019 through participant observation, in-depth interviews, and focused discussions that presented 15 representatives from assistants, NGOs, and academics in Malang. There were also 25 IMWs representatives with placement experience in Hong Kong, Taiwan, Malaysia, and Saudi Arabia. We found that the majority of IMWs use social media as a means of communicating between themselves and their families in the country; however, social media content for social activism is low, especially for the issue of IMWs protection. The culture and legal system in the countries of origin and destination countries influence the low level of participation in the content they create. IMWs is placed in a country with a more open culture, where local laws are more apparent in the protection of IMWs, so IMW's social media content is more open and willing to provide testimony on the problems that exist around them and vice versa. Therefore, although social media is massive among IMWs, it is not linear with content production that leads to protection.
Aini AN (2019) Peran Konsulat Jenderal Republik Indonesia (KJRI) di Penang dalam perlindungan tenaga kerja wanita pada masa penempatan. Thesis, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
Amnesty International (2013) China: Exploited for profit, failed by governments: Indonesian Migrant Domestic Workers trafficked to Hong Kong. [Accessed 20 December 2019]. https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/ASA17/029/2013/en/.
Anggaunitakiranantika A (2017) Interaksi buruh migran perempuan sebagai kekuatan modal sosial. Jurnal Sosiologi Pendidikan Humanis 2 (1):33-40. https://doi.org/10.17977/um021v2 i12017p033.
Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia (2014) Profil pengguna internet Indonesia. [Accessed 20 December 2019]. https://apjii.or.id/survei2014/download/XldaA4mS87ThVUBQ0FIoN Cgn6MRLEK.
Asosiasi Penyelenggara Jasa Internet Indonesia (2016) Penetrasi dan perilaku pengguna Internet Indonesia. [Accessed 20 December 2019]. https://apjii.or.id/downfile/file/surveipenetrasi internet2016.pdf.
Astuti B (2008) Sertifikasi uji kompetensi sebagai upaya perlindungan hukum bagi Tenaga Kerja Indonesia/Tenaga Kerja Wanita Penata Laksana Rumah Tangga (TKI/TKWPLRT). Thesis, Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang.
Astuti TMP (2008) Antropologis tentang trafficking TKW di Malaysia: Antara ada dan tiada. Forum Ilmu Sosial 35 (2):113-123.
Badan Nasional Penempatan dan Perlindungan Tenaga Kerja Indonesia (2016) Renstra BNP2TKI Tahun 2015-2019. [Accessed 20 December 2019]. http://portal.bnp2tki.go.id/read/11424/RENSTRA-BNP2TKI-TAHUN-2015-2019.html.
Badan Nasional Penempatan dan Perlindungan Tenaga Kerja Indonesia (2019) Data penempatan dan perlindungan PMI periode Juni 2019. [Accessed 20 December 2019]. http://www.bnp2tki.go.id/uploads/statistik/images/data_12-07-2019_Laporan_Pengolahan_Data_BNP2TKI _____Bulan__JUNI_1_REV.pdf.
Bimber B, Flanagin AJ, & Stohl C (2005) Reconceptualizing collective action in the contemporary media environment. Communication Theory 15 (4):365-388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468- 2885.2005.tb00340.x.
Botha E & Mills AJ (2012) Managing New Media: Tools for Brand Management in Social Media. In: Angeline GC (ed). Online Consumer Behavior: Theory and Research in Social Media, Advertising and E-Tail. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Constable N (1997) Maid to Order in Hongkong: Stories of Filipina Workers. New York: Cornell University Press.
Dalton R, Sickle AV, & Weldon S (2010) The individual-institutional nexus of protest behaviour. British Journal of Political Science 40 (1):51-73. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712340999038X.
Egebark J & Ekström M (2011) Like what you like or like what others like? Conformity and peer Effects on Facebook. In: IFN Working Paper No 886, Stockholm: Research Institute of Industrial Economics. [Accessed 20 December 2019]. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/81323/1/wp886.pdf.
Gil de Zúñiga H, Molyneux L, & Zheng P (2014) Social media, political expression, and political participation: Panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships. Journal of Communication 64 (4):612-634. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12103.
Glesne C (2011) Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An Introduction (4th ed). Boston: Pearson.
Go E & You KH (2016) But not all social media are the same: Analyzing organizations' social media usage patterns. Telematics and Informatics 33 (1):176-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.06.016.
Goldenberg J, Libai B, & Muller E (2001) Talk of the network: A complex systems look at the underlying process of word-of-mouth. Marketing Letters 12 (3):211-223. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011122126881.
Haciyakupoglu G & Zhang W (2015) Social media trust during the Gezi Protests in Turkey. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 20 (4):450-466. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12121.
Harlow S & Guo L (2014) Will the revolution be tweeted or facebooked? Using digital communication tools in immigrant activism. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19 (3):463-478. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12062.
Harrell MC & Bradley MA (2009) Data Collection Methods: Semi-Structured Interview and Focus Groups. Santa Monica: RAND National Defense Research Institute.
Hug T (2012) Explorations in the tension between media activism and action-oriented media pedagogy. Journalism and Mass Communication 2 (3):457-463.
Jackson SJ & Welles BF (2015) Hijacking #MYNYPD: Social media dissent and networked counterpublics. Journal of Communication 65 (6):932-952. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12185.
Kansil CST (2009) Tindak Pidana dalam Undang-Undang Nasional. Jakarta: Jala Permata Aksara.
Kementerian Luar Negeri Republik Indonesia (2019) Laporan kinerja tahun 2018. [Accessed 10 January 2020]. https://kemlu.go.id/download/L3NpdGVzL3B1c2F0L0RvY3VtZW50cy9MS0pfS2 VtZW5sdV8yMDE4LnBkZg==.
Komisi Nasional Anti Kekerasan terhadap Perempuan (2019) Laporan independen lembaga nasional Hak Asasi Manusia tentang 25 tahun pelaksanaan kesepakatan Global Beijing Platform for Action (BPfA+25) di Indonesia. Disampaikan kepada Commission on the Status of Women (CSW), 27 September 2019. [Accessed 10 January 2020]. https://komnasperempuan.go.id/laporan-internasional.
Lim M (2003) The Internet, Social Network, and Reform in Indonesia. In: Nick CJC (ed). Contesting Media Power: Alternative Media in a Networked World (Critical Media Studies: Institutions, Politics, and Culture). Lanham: Rowan and Littlefield.
Lim M & Kann M (2008) Politics: Deliberation, Mobilization, and Networked Practices of Agitation. In: Varnelis K (ed). Networked Publics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Lovejoy K & Saxton GD (2012) Information, community, and action: How nonprofit organizations use social media. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17 (3):337-353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01576.x.
Nuraini I & Rochminarni AB (2013) Potensi sumber daya daerah dan kesejahteraan keluarga TKI. Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan 11 (2):1-17. https://doi.org/10.22219/jep.v11i2.3741.
Papacharissi Z (2010) A Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites. New York: Routledge.
Parveen F, Jaafar NI, & Ainin S (2015) Social media usage and organizational performance: Reflections of Malaysian social media managers. Telematics and Informatics 32 (1):67-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2014.03.001.
Pudjiono MJ & Nugroho SS (2014) Pertanggung jawaban pidana pelaku tindak pidana perdagangan orang (Trafficking). Jurnal Sosial 15 (1):43-53.
Rupita (2020) Kehidupan perempuan perbatasan: Kemiskinan dan eksploitasi (Kajian kasus di perbatasan Jagoi Indonesia-Malaysia Kalimantan Barat). Ganaya: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora 3 (1):135-145. https://doi.org/10.37329/ganaya.v3i1.429.
Russell A, Ito M, Richmond T, & Tuters M (2008) Culture: Media Convergence and Networked Participation. In: Kazys V (ed). Networked Publics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sijapati B (2015) Women's labour migration from Asia and the Pacific: Opportunities and Challenges. [Accessed 20 December 2019]. https://www.migrationpolicy.org/research/womens-labour-migration-asia-and-pacific-opportunities-and-challenges.
Sutaat S (2008) Masalah sosial Tenaga Kerja Wanita Indonesia di shelter KBRI Kuala Lumpur. Sosio Konsepsia 13 (2):1-14.
Syakriah A (2017) Aktivisme Buruh Migran Indonesia (BMI) melalui media sosial (Studi kasus pada aktivisme BMI melalui Facebook). Thesis, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya.
Tajudeen FP, Jaafar NI, & Ainin S (2018) Understanding the impact of social media usage among organizations. Information & Management 55 (3):308-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im. 2017.08.004.
Thompson EC (2009) Mobile phones, communities and social networks among foreign workers in Singapore. Global Networks 9 (3):359-380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0374. 2009.00258.x.
Treem JW & Leonardi PM (2013) Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association 36 (1):143-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2013.11679130.
Copyright of this journal is possession of Editorial Board and Journal Manager, by the knowledge of the author, while the moral right of the publication belongs to the author.
The formal legal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA), implies that publication can be used for non-commercial purposes in its original form (cannot be modified).
Every publication (printed/electronic) are open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.