Private actor accountability on international regimes

Wahyudi Purnomo, Novita Putri Rudiany, Citra Hennida

Abstract views = 752 times | downloads = 573 times


Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) have emerged along with the growing role of corporations in global development. One of the largest forms of PPP today is the UN Global Compact. The UN Global Compact involves of companies, NGOs, IGOs and state governments. All of them are trying to realize globalization with a more humanist face with attention to the protection of human rights, environment, labor standards and anti-corruption. Engaging private actors in global governance, The UN Global Compact raises many issues such as power, authority, and legitimacy. The effort to tackle it all is to increase PPP accountability. This research seeks to describe what efforts can be made to enhance private accountability within the international regime. The research undertaken is a descriptive study, focuses on public-private partnerships in the UN Global Compact regime. The study found that there were two attempts that could be done. First, by involving the stakeholders in the development of procedures, mechanisms, reporting and monitoring associated with trying to improve the company’s reputation. Second, by looking at corporate relations as agent and UN Global Compact as principal in principal-agent relation in the international regime.


public-private partnership, international regime, UN Global Compact

Full Text:



Arevalo JA & Fallon FT (2008) Assesing corporate responsibility as a contribution to global governance: The case of the UN Global Compact. Corporate Governance, 8:456-470.

Bernstein S (2005) Legitimacy in global environmental governance. Journal of International law and International Relations, 1:139-166.

Bull B & McNeil D (2006) Development Issues in Global Governance: Public-Private Partnership and Market Multilateralism. Warwick Studies in globalization. Routledge: London.

Buse K & Harmer AM (2007) Seven habits of highly effective global public-private health partnership: Practice and potential. Social Science & Medicine, 64:259-271.

Clapp J (1998) The privatization of global environmental governance: ISO 14000 and the developing world. Global Governance, 4:295-316.

Dingwerth K (2007) The New Transnationalism: Transnational Governance and Democratic Legitimacy. Houndmills, Bsingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Edwards M (2000) NGO Rights and Responsibilities: A New Deal for Global Governance. London: The Foreign Policy Centre.

Forman S & Segaar D (2006) New coalitions for global governance: The changing dynamics of multilateralism. Global Governance, 12 (2):205-225.

Hale TN & Mauzerall DL (2004) Thinking globally and acting locally: Can the johannesburg partnerships coordinate action on sustainable development?. Journal of Environment and

Development, 13:220-239.

Held D & Koenig-Archibugi M (eds) (2005) Global Governance and Public Accountability. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Hennida C (2015) Rezim dan Organisasi Internasional: Interaksi Negara, Kedaulatan, dan Institusi Multilateral. Malang: Intrans Publishing.

Hoessle U (2013) The contribution of the UN Global Compact towards the compliance of international regimes: A comparative study of businesses from the USA, Mozambique, United Arab Emirates and Germany. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 53 (2):27-60.

Hurd I (2003) Labor standards through international organizations: The global compact in comparative perspective. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 11:99-111.

Karl T (1997) The Paradox of Plenty: Oil Booms and Petro-states. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Keohane RO (2006) Accountability in world politics. Scandinavian Political Studies, 29:75-87.

Kiewiet R & McCubbins M (1991) The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Koenig-Archibugi M (2005) Transnational Corporations and Public Accountability. In: D Held & M Koenig-Archibugi (eds). Global Governance and Public Accountability. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Lloyd RSW & Hammer M (2008) 2008 Global Accountability Report. London: One World Trust.

Mimkes P (2002) Bayer and the UN Global Compact: How and Why a Major Pharmeaceutical and Chemical Company “Blewashes” its Image. Corp Watch, 19 July 2002.

Nelson J (2001) Cooperation between the United Nations and All Relevant Partners, in Particular the Private Sector’ in Report of the Secretary General, A 56/323. New York: United Nations.

Potoski M & Prakash A (2005) Green clubs and voluntary governance: ISO14001 and firms’ regulatory compliance. American Journal of Political Science, 49 (2):235-248.

Risse T (2000) Let’s argue! Communicative action in international relations. International Organization, 54:1-39.

Ruggie JG (2002) The theory and practice of learning networks: Corporate social responsibility and the global compact. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 5:27-36.

Ruggie JG (2003) Taking Embedded Liberalism Global: The Corporate Connection. In: D Held & M Koenig-Archibugi (eds). Taming Globalization: Frontiers of Governance. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Sutopo AH & Arief A (2010) Terampil Mengolah Data Kualitatif dengan NVIVO. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.

Tamm H & Snidal D (2014) Rational Choice and Principal-Agent Theory. In: T Weiss & R Wilkinson (eds). International Organization an Global Governance. London: Routledge.s

Tesner S (2000) The United Nations and Business. A Partnership Recovered. New York: St Martin’s Press.

Therien JP & Pouliot V (2006) The global compact: Shifting the politics of international development?. Global Governance, 12 (1):55-75.

Williams OF (2004) The UN Global Compact: The challenge and the promise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14 (4):755-774.

Zurn M (2000) Democratic governance beyond the nation state: The EU and other International Institutions. European Journal of International Relations, 6 (2):183-221.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik

Indexing by:




View MKP Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License