The carrying capacity for the development of marine ecotourism
Downloads
Tanjung Karang in Donggala Regency has the potential to be developed using the concept of marine ecotourism. However, the management system tends to be contradictory with the principles of marine ecotourism. The aim of this research is to understand the supporting factors and challenges in implementing marine ecotourism in Tanjung Karang, as well as studying the carrying capacity and human resources. A qualitative research method was used through interviews and participant observation. The research shows that natural potential and traditional socio-cultural activities conducted by the community are both essential in supporting Tanjung Karang as a channel of marine ecotourism. The three management systems supported by the community, government and private sector are capable of making a difference in relation to marine ecotourism implementation. In building tourism facilities, people tend to ignore the environmental preservation aspect. In addition, the private sector, as one of the tourism developers, also needs to ensure the management of Tanjung Karang that they will provide opportunities for the local community to enjoy nature and the culture offered. This tourism should not be exclusively for international tourists. Although Tanjung Karang has been used as a tourist attraction before, marine ecotourism has not been prioritised as the development framework by the stakeholders. Efforts have been undertaken to support the implementation of marine ecotourism and the stakeholder needs to understand the supporting factors and challenges involved, as well as the carrying capacity, in order to develop Tanjung Karang's marine ecotourism.
Almeyda AM, Broadbent EN, Wyman MS & Durham WH (2010) Ecotourism impacts in the Nicoya Peninsula, Costa Rica. International Journal of Tourism Research, 12:803-819. Doi: 10.1002/ jtr.797.
Balint PJ (2006) Improving community-based conservation near protected areas: The importance of development variables. Environmental Management, 38:137-148.
Barkauskiene K & Snieska V (2013) Ecotourism as an integral part of sustainable tourism development. Economics and Management, 18 (3).
Blamey RK (2001) Principles of Ecotourism. In: DB Weaver (ed). The Encyclopedia of Ecotourism. Wallingford: CABI.
Butcher J (2007) Ecotourism, NGOs and Development: A Critical Analysis. London: Routledge.
Cater E (2004) Ecotourism: Theory and Practice. In: AA Lew, CM Hall, & AM Williams (eds). A Companion to Tourism. Malden: Blackwell. 484-497.
Fennell DA (2015) Ecotourism (Fourth Edition). London: Routledge.
Hall CM & Page SJ (2006) The Geography of Tourism and Recreation. London: Routledge.
Hounslow B (2002) Community capacity explained. Stronger Families Learning Exchange Bulletin, 1:20-22.
Jones S (2005) Community-based ecotourism: The significance of social capital. Annals of Tourism Research, 32 (2):303-324. doi:10.1016/j.annals.2004.06.007.
Junaid I (2017) Langkah strategis pengembangan indigenous tourism: Studi kasus di Kabupaten Kepulauan Selayar. Masyarakat, Kebudayaan dan Politik, 30 (3):266-277.
Kontogeorgopoulos N & Chulikavit K (2010) Supply-side perspectives on ecotourism in Northerland Thailand. International Journal of Tourism Research, 12:627-641. doi: 10.1002/jtr.785.
Copyright of this journal is possession of Editorial Board and Journal Manager, by the knowledge of the author, while the moral right of the publication belongs to the author.
The formal legal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA), implies that publication can be used for non-commercial purposes in its original form (cannot be modified).
Every publication (printed/electronic) are open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.