Analysis of E-mail Transactions in Virtual Reference Services
Downloads
Today, the use of traditional reference desk in the academic libraries has been rarely used, thus expanding or even move to a virtual reference service. A minimum level of virtual reference services are provided in the academic library is currently in general is the electronic mail (e-mail). One of the academic library specifically provide virtual reference services via e-mail is a Petra Christian University (PCU) Library (refdesk@petra.ac.id.). In such services librarians provide assistance to users in finding information and answer questions. This study aimed to analyze the transaction reference services virtually through e-mail at the PCU Library, with a view of the types of questions based on user background, the writing style of language communication interaction used based on user background, and cultural values are revealed behind the user in virtual reference services (e-mail). This study uses content analysis (content analysis) of the transcript e-mail received librarians of reference services began March 10 until June 16, 2015. The results showed that the types of questions asked in reference service virtual (e-mail) in the Library UK Petra include: specific search, access online resources, operation of online resources, policies and procedures for services, and library holdings with background the student (PCU and non-PCU), faculty, and librarians. Based on the background of users found that overall more types of questions asked in virtual reference services (e-mail) is a problem of access to online resources, and generally submitted by the students. Then, the writing style of the user's language in interaction reference service virtual (e-mail) tends to be formal, which includes the word greeting, the message will be delivered, and regards cover, either by the student (PCU and non-PCU), lecturer, or librarians. While cultural values that revealed the background behind the user in virtual reference services (e-mail) is obedience, courtesy and politeness users.
Keywords: virtual reference services, e-mail reference service, e-mail transactions, content analysis, academic libraries
Downloads
Arnold, J., & Kaske, N. (2005). Evaluating the Quality Of A Chat Service. Portal Libraries and The Academy, 5(2), 177-193.
Babbie, E. R. (2010). The practice of social research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage.
Diamond, W., & Pease, B. (2001). Digital reference: A case study of question types in an academic library. Reference Services Review, 29(3), 210–219. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000005663
McClure, C., et.,al. (2002). Statistics, measures, and quality standards for assessing digital reference library services: Guidlines and procedures. New York: Syracuse University
Pomerantz, J. (2005). A Conceptual framework and open research questions for chat based reference service. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(12), 1288-1302. doi:10.1002/asi.20215.
Shachaf, P., and Sarah M. H. (2008). Virtual reference service evaluation: adherence to rusa behavioral guidelines and ifla digital reference guidelines. Library & Information Science Research, 30, 122–137.
Shachaf, P., Lokman, I. M., and Noriko, H. (2007). Cross-cultural analysis of e-mail reference. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(2), 243–253.
Shachaf, P., and Snyder, M. (2007). The relationship between cultural diversity and user needs in virtual reference services. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(3), 361-367.
Record and Library Journal by Unair is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
3. The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC BY-SA).
4. The Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC BY-SA) license allows re-distribution and re-use of a licensed work on the conditions that the creator is appropriately credited and that any derivative work is made available under “the same, similar or a compatible license”. Other than the conditions mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.
