MANAGING SOCIAL INNOVATION IN CROWDFUNDING DIGITAL PLATFORM
Unduhan
ABSTRACT
Intractable social and economic problems are increasingly complex in developing countries caused by a discrepancy between economic growth and equitable welfare. The government policy on one hand and market solution, on the other hand, have proved inadequate since lacks of incentives, appropriate model and support from the market to tackle its externalities while the civil society lacks resources, ideas and skills to scale. Therefore, the collaboration concept to solve this problem arisen by crowdsourcing, especially crowd funding business model. This study aims to identify and analyze how crowdfunding digital platform managing their social innovation and how social innovation networks support them to achieve their goals. This research is descriptive qualitative research with the study of literature, participatory observation and interviews on crowdsourcing platforms as the data collection method to Indonesian crowdfunding platforms: Kitabisa.com and Gandeng Tangan. As a social innovation, the two companies have different social innovation networks but apply similar stages of social innovation, from the stage of idea formulation to scaling and diffusion of innovation, but both are still in the development stage to create a systemic impact on social innovation as a whole. This research is expected to have practical implications for social innovation empowerment that initiated by the government or private sector and theoretical implication about the development of collaboration-based innovation management to solve social and economic problems. The novelty of research of this research lies in the focus of research that discusses the role of crowdfunding platforms in creating social innovation that has not been much studied in Indonesia.
Keywords: social innovation, Indonesia, socio and economic problems, crowdfunding, digital platform.
ABSTRAK
Masalah-masalah sosial dan ekonomi yang tak terelakkan semakin kompleks di negara-negara berkembang yang disebabkan oleh perbedaan antara pertumbuhan ekonomi dan kesejahteraan yang adil. Kebijakan pemerintah tidak mungkin menyelesaikan beberapa masalah yang paling mendesak ” seperti kemiskinan, perubahan iklim, pengangguran, penyakit pandemi, dan meluasnya kesenjangan kesejahteraan. Kebijakan pemerintah di satu sisi dan solusi pasar, di sisi lain, terbukti tidak memadai karena kurangnya insentif, model yang tepat dan dukungan dari pasar untuk mengatasi eksternalitasnya sementara masyarakat sipil kekurangan sumber daya, ide, dan keterampilan untuk berkembang. Oleh karena itu, konsep kolaborasi untuk menyelesaikan masalah ini muncul dengan crowdsourcing, khususnya model bisnis crowfunding. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi dan menganalisis bagaimana platform digital crowdfunding mengelola inovasi sosial mereka dan bagaimana jaringan inovasi sosial mendukung mereka untuk mencapai tujuan mereka. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif deskriptif dengan studi literatur, observasi partisipatif dan wawancara pada platform crowdfunding sebagai metode pengumpulan data ke dua platform crowdfunding terbesar Indonesia: Kitabisa.com dan Gandeng Tangan. Sebagai inovasi sosial, kedua perusahaan memiliki jaringan inovasi sosial yang berbeda tetapi menerapkan tahap-tahap inovasi sosial yang serupa, dari tahap perumusan ide hingga penskalaan dan difusi inovasi, tetapi keduanya masih dalam tahap pengembangan untuk menciptakan dampak sistemik pada inovasi sosial secara keseluruhan.Penelitian ini diharapkan memiliki implikasi praktis untuk pemberdayaan inovasi sosial yang diprakarsai oleh pemerintah atau sektor swasta dan implikasi teoretis tentang pengembangan manajemen inovasi berbasis kolaborasi untuk menyelesaikan masalah sosial dan ekonomi. Kebaruan penelitian penelitian ini terletak pada fokus penelitian yang membahas peran platform crowdfunding dalam menciptakan inovasi sosial yang belum banyak diteliti di Indonesia.
Kata kunci: inovasi sosial, Indonesia, masalah sosial dan ekonomi, crowdfunding, platform digital
Agrawal, Ajay., Catalini, Christian and Goldfarb, Abi. (2010) (online version). The Geography of Crowdfunding. NBER Working Paper No. 16820 http://www.nber.org/papers/w16820.pdf 2.
Agrawal, A., Catalini, C., & Goldfarb, A. (2014). Some simple economics of crowdfunding. Innovation policy and the economy, 14(1), 63-97.
Agrawal, A., Catalini, C., & Goldfarb, A. (2015). Crowdfunding: Geography, social networks, and the timing of investment decisions. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 24(2), 253-274.
Battisti, S. (2013). Social innovation in dynamic environments: organizing technology for temporary advantage (Vol. 2). Universití di Trento.
Barnett, Chance. (2014). "Crowdfunding Sites In 2014". Forbes.com. Retrieved 2020-01-02.
Belleflamme, Paul and Lambert. Thomas. (2014). Crowdfunding: Some Empirical Findings and Microeconomic Underpinnings. SSRN Electron. J. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2437786
Bellotti, Victoria., Cambridge, Sara ., Hoy, Karen., Shih, Patrick., Handalian, Lisa., Han, Kyungsik and Carroll, John. (2014). Towards Community-Centred Support for Peer to-Peer Service Exchange: Rethinking the Timebanking Metaphor. In Proceedings of the 2014 SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'14). New York: ACM Press, 2975-2984. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557061
Bernardino, S., & Santos, J. F. (2017, February). Potential of civic crowdfunding to the intelligence of cities and social innovation: an exploratory study. In Atas da Conferíªncia da Associaçí£o Portuguesa de Sistemas de Informaçí£o (Vol. 16, No. 16, pp. 311-323).
Bourdieu, Pierre. (2005). The Social Structures of the Economy. Polity Press.
Bowker, Geoffrey C. and Leigh Star, Susan. (2000). Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. MIT Press.
Carè, S., Trotta, A., Carè, R., & Rizzello, A. (2018). Crowdfunding for the development of smart cities. Business Horizons, 61(4), 501-509.
Caroli, M. G., Fracassi, E., Maiolini, R., & Carnini Pulino, S. (2018). Exploring social innovation components and attributes: a taxonomy proposal. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 9(2), 94-109.
Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., Esposito, E., & Raffa, M. (2016). The revolution of crowdfunding in social knowledge economy: Literature review and identification of business models. Advanced Science Letters, 22(5-6), 1666-1669.
Choy, Katherine; Schlagwein, Daniel (2016), "Crowdsourcing for a better world: On the relation between IT affordances and donor motivations in charitable crowdfunding", Information Technology & People, 29 (1): 221–247, doi:10.1108/ITP-09-2014-0215
Davidson, Roel and Poor. Nathaniel. (2016). Factors for success in repeat crowdfunding: why sugar daddies are only good for Bar-Mitzvahs, Information, Communication & Society, 19:1, 127-139 DOI=http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.10935 33 13.
Davies, Rodrigo. (2014). Three provocations for civic crowdfunding. In Information, Communication & Society. 18 (3). http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.989878
De Falco, S. E., Vargas-Sánchez, A. L. F. O. N. S. O., & Cucari, N. I. C. O. L. A. (2015). Social innovation practices: focus on success factors for crowdfunding. Retrieved February, 25, 2016.
Dulaurans, M. (2014). Digital social innovation: the crowdfunding model. Vivat Academia, (127), 72-81.
Gawer, Annabelle. (2009). Platforms, Markets and Innovation: An Introduction. In Platforms, Markets and Innovation. Annabelle Gawer ed. 2009. Edward Elgar, 1-16
Gerber, Elizabeth and Hui, Julie. (2013). Crowdfunding: Motivations and deterrents for participation. In ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 20 (6): article no. 34. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2530540
González Cacheda, B. (2018). Social Innovation and Crisis in the Third Sector in Spain. Results, Challenges and Limitations of ‘Civic Crowdfunding'. Journal of Civil Society, 14(4), 275-291.
Haas, P., Blohm, I., & Leimeister, J. M. (2014). An empirical taxonomy of crowdfunding intermediaries. Paper presented at the International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS), Auckland, New Zealand.
Hutami, Nurul & Irwansyah. (2019). Pemanfaatan Aplikasi Mobile Kitabisa dalam Pelaksanaan Crowdfunding di Indonesia. Komunikasi, Vol. XIII No.2, 183-194.
Hui, Julie S., Greenberg, Michael D., Gerber, Elizabeth M..(2014). Understanding the role of community in crowdfunding work. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing (CSCW '14), 62-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531715
Howe, Jeff (2006). The Rise of Crowdsourcing. WIRED. Retrieved from <https://www.wired.com/2006/06/crowds/>
Irwansyah,
Kholid, Muamar Nur. (2018). Keberterimaan Muzaki Terhadap Zakat Crowdfunding di Indonesia: Preliminary Research. Conference on Islamic Management, Accounting and Economics, Vol. 1, 52-58.
Kitabisa.com. (2018). Annual Report. Retrieved from <https://2018.kitabisa.com/>
Koku, P. S., Marakkath, N., & Attuel-mendes, L. (2015). Can microfinance crowdfunding reduce financial exclusion? Regulatory issues. International Journal of Bank Marketing.
Lehner, O. M. (2013). Crowdfunding social ventures: a model and research agenda. Venture Capital, 15(4), 289-311.
Lehner, O. M., & Nicholls, A. (2014). Social finance and crowdfunding for social enterprises: A public–private case study providing legitimacy and leverage. Venture Capital, 16(3), 271-286.
Light, Ann and Miskelly. Clodagh. (2015). Sharing Economy vs Sharing Cultures? Designing for social, economic and environmental good, IxD&A, 49-62 http://www.mifav.uniroma2.it/inevent/events/idea2010/ doc/24_3.pdf
Light, A., & Briggs, J. (2017). Crowdfunding platforms and the design of paying publics. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 797-809).
Mariani, A., Monteleone, S., & Privitera, D. (2017). Crowdfunding as social innovation practice: Experiences in Italy. RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'.
Massey, Doreen B.. (1995). Spatial Divisions of Labor: Social Structures and the Geography of Production, Psychology Press.
Mollick, E., & Robb, A. (2016). Democratizing innovation and capital access: The role of crowdfunding. California management review, 58(2), 72-87.
Mulgan, G. (2018). Social innovation, the last and next decade. Atlas of social innovation, new practices for a better future, 194-197.
Muller, M., Geyer, W., Soule, T., Daniels, S., & Cheng, L. T. (2013). Crowdfunding inside the enterprise: employee-initiatives for innovation and collaboration. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 503-512).
Muller, Michael., Geyer, Werner., Soule, Todd., Daniels, Steven and Cheng, Li-Te. (2014). Crowdfunding inside the Enterprise: Employee-Initiatives for Innovation and Collaboration. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14), 503-512. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2470654.2470727.
Murray, Robin., Caulier-Grice, Julie and Mulgan, Geoff. (2009). Ways to Design, Develop and Grow Social Innovation: Social Venturing. Nesta and the Young Foundation. http://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/social_ventu ring.pdf
Murray, Robin., Caulier-Grice, Julie & Mulgan, Geoff. (2010). The Open Book of Social Innovation (Social Innovator Series: Ways to Design, Develop and Grow Social Innovation).The Young Foundation, THE LAB & NESTA.
Muzellec, Laurent., Ronteau, Sébastien and Lambkin, Mary. (2015). Two-sided Internet Platforms: A Business Model Lifecycle Perspective. In Industrial Marketing Management, 44 (2), 139-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.02.012
Novy, Andreas and Leubolt, Bernhard. (2005). Participatory budgeting in Porto Alegre: Social innovation and the dialectical relationship of state and civil society. Urban Studies 42, 11: 2023–2036. http://doi.org/10.1080/00420980500279828
Nugroho, Yuswanto & Rachmaniyah, Fatichatur. (2019). Fenomena Perkembangan Crowfunding di Indonesia. EkoNiKa, Vol. 4 (1), 34-46. Doi : http://dx.doi.org/10.30737/ekonika.v4i1.254
Özdemir, V., Faris, J., & Srivastava, S. (2015). Crowdfunding 2.0: the next"generation philanthropy. EMBO reports, 16(3), 267-271.
Passani, A., Klitsi, M., & Vanobberger, W. (2016). Exploring impacts of collective awareness platforms for sustainability and social innovation.
Pierrakis, Yannis and Collins, Liam. (2013). Banking on Each Other: Peer-to-peer lending to business: evidence from funding circle. Nesta.
Prive, Tanya. (2015)."What Is Crowdfunding And How Does It Benefit The Economy". Forbes.com. Retrieved 2015-07-02.
Reeves, Stuart., Sherwood, Scott and Brown, Barry. (2010). Designing for Crowds. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (NordiCHI '10), 393-402 http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1868914.1868960
Riedl, J. (2013). Crowdfunding technology innovation. Computer, (3), 100-103.
San-Jose, L., & Retolaza, J. L. (2016). Crowdlending as a Socially Innovative Corporate Financial Instrument'. International perspectives on crowdfunding: positive, normative and critical theory, 129.
Setiyowati, Arin. (2019). Empowering Islamic Philanthropy: Analysis of Entrepreneurial Capital Assistance Program by LAZISMU Surabaya City, Humanities Social and Science Reviews, Vol.7 (4), 1028-2025.
Stiver, Alexandra., Barroca, Leonor., Minocha, Shailey., Richards, Mike and Roberts, Dave. (2015). Civic crowdfunding research: Challenges, opportunities, and future agenda. New Media & Society, 17 (2), 249-271. doi: 10.1177/1461444814558914
Trompenaars, Fons. (2007). Riding the Whirlwind: Connecting People and Organization in the Culture of Innovation. US: Infinite Ideas.
World Bank. (2020). Country Overview. Retrieved from <https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/indonesia/overview>
Yunus, M., & Weber, K. (2007). Creating a World without Poverty: social business and the future of capitalism. New York, NY: PublicAffairs.
Yunus, M., Moingeon, B., & Lehmann-Ortega, L. (2010). Building social business models: lessons from the Grammen Experience. Long R
1. Copyright of this journal is possession of Editorial Board and Journal Manager, by the knowledge of author, whilst the moral right of the publication belongs to the author.
2. Legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Atribusi-Non Commercial-No ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA),implies that publication can be used for non-commercial purposes in its original form (cannot be modified).
3. Every publications are open access for educational purposes, research, and library. Other that the aims mentioned above, editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.
AJIM by Unair is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.