DIFFERENCE OF POWER TEST AND TYPE II ERROR (β) ON MARDIA MVN TEST, HENZE ZIKLER'S MVN TEST, AND ROYSTON'S MVN TEST USING MULTIVARIATE DATA ANALYSIS
Downloads
The Mardia MVN test, Henze Zikler's MVN test, and Royston's MVN test are the most widely used tests to analyze multivariate normal (MVN) data, but there have not been many studies explaining the advantages and disadvantages of these tests. The research objective was to analyze the difference in test strength and type II (β) error in the Mardia MVN test, Henze Zikler's MVN test, and Royston's MVN test. The research data were analyzed using three MVN tests, namely the Mardia MVN test, Henze Zikler's MVN test, and Royston's MVN test. The results of the analysis in the form of test strength and type II error (β) would be compared at alpha (α) 1%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, and 25%. The comparison results explained that the Mardia test had the greatest test strength and the smallest type II (β) error. The study concluded that the Mardia MVN test was a multivariate normal test better than Henze Zikler's MVN test and Royston's MVN test.
Borkowf, C.B, Johnson, L.L and Albert, PS. 2018. Power and Sample Size Calculations. [online] In Principles and Practice of Clinical Research. Elsevier.
Bujang, M.A and Adnan, T.H. 2016. Requirements for Minimum Sample Size for sensitivity and Specificity Analysis. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 10(10), pp.1–6.
Cain, M.K., Zhang, Z. and Yuan, K.H. 2017. Univariate and Multivariate Skewness and Kurtosis for Measuring Nonnormality: Prevalence, Influence and Estimation. Behavior Research Methods, 49, pp.1716–1735.
Ellis, A.R, Burchett, W.W, Harrar., S.W, and Bathke, A.C. 2017. Nonparametric Inference for Multivariate Data: The R Package NPMV. Journal of Statistical Software, 12(4), pp.156–170.
Farrell, P.J, Salibian-Barrera, M. and Naczk, K. 2007. On Tests for Multivariate Normality and Associated Simulation Studies. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 77(12), pp.1065–1080.
Gelfond, J., Goros, M., Hernandez, B. and Bokov, A. 2018. A System for an Accountable Data Analysis Process in R. R Journal, 10(1), pp.6–21.
Hanusz, Z., Enomoto, R., Seo, T. and Koizumi, K., 2018. A Monte Carlo Comparison of Jarque–Bera Type Tests and Henze–Zirkler Test of Multivariate Normality. Communications in Statistics: Simulation and Computation, 01(01), pp.1–14.
Henze, N. and Zirkler, B., 1990. A Class of Invariant Consistent Tests for Multivariate Normality. Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 19(10), pp.3595–3617.
Kestin, I. 2018. Statistics in Medicine. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, 19(3), pp.136–143.
Kim, H.-Y. 2015. Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Type I and Type II Errors in Statistical Decision. Restorative Dentisty and Endodontics, 40(3), pp.249–252.
Korkmaz, S., Goksuluk, D. and Zararsiz, G., 2014. MVN: An R Package for Assessing Multivariate Normality. R Journal, 14(5), pp.1–14.
Lee, S. and Lee, D.K, 2018. What Is the Proper Way to Apply the Multiple Comparison Test?. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 71(5), pp.353–360.
Mardia, KV, 1970. Measures of Multivariate Skewness and Kurtosis with Applications. Biometrika, 57(3), pp.519–530.
Mecklin, CJ and Mundfrom, DJ, 2005. A Monte Carlo Comparison of the Type I and Type II Error Rates of Tests of Multivariate Normality. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 7(2), pp.93–107.
Mishra, P., Pandey, C,. M, Singh, U., Gupta, A., Sahu, C. and Keshri, A., 2019. Descriptive Statistics and Normality Tests for Statistical Data. Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia, 22(1), pp.67–72.
Nahm, FS, 2016. Nonparametric Statistical Tests for the Continuous Data: The Basic Concept and the Practical Use. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 69(1), pp.8–14.
Oppong, F., B and Agbedra, S.,Y, 2016. Assessing Univariate and Multivariate Normality, A Guide For Non-Statisticians. Mathematical Theory and Modeling, 9(2), pp.26–33
Rani D., K., 2016. A Brief Review of Tests for Normality. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), pp.5–12.
Shreffler, J. and Huecker, MR, 2020. Type I and Type II Errors and Statistical Power. [online] StatPearls Publishing LLC. Available at: <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK557530/>.
Ueki, C. and Sakaguchi, G., 2018. Importance of Awareness of Type II Error. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 105(1), pp.333–342.
Vogt, W., 2015. Multivariate Normality. In: W.P. Vogt, ed. Dictionary of Statistics and Methodology, 3rd ed. SAGE Publications, Inc.pp.59–70.
Zhou, M. and Shao, Y., 2015. A Powerful Test for Multivariate Normality. Journal of Applied Statistics, 41(2), pp.351–163.
Copyright ©2022 Jurnal Biometrika dan Kependudukan (Journal of Biometrics and Population)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. Copyright of all journal manuscripts is held by the Jurnal Biometrika dan Kependudukan.
2. Formal legal provisions to access digital articles of the electronic journals are subject to the provision of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license (CC BY-NC-SA), which means that Jurnal Kesehatan Biometrika dan Kependudukan to keep, transfer media/format, manage in the form of databases, maintain, and publish articles.
3. Published manuscripts both printed and electronic are open access for educational, research, and library purposes. Additionally, the editorial board is not responsible for any violations of copyright law.
