Exploring topics of the female librarians
Topic modelling approach on research articles
Background of the study: Female librarians often face limitations in their professional development and encounter various challenges. Previous studies have shown that while many articles focus on women librarians as a subject, few delve into the topics discussed.
Purpose: This research aims to find out which topics are developing in the world of libraries, with a specific focus on female librarians.
Method: This study uses topic modelling to explore abstracts from documents discussing female librarians, using BERTopic, scattertext, and VOSviewer to identify emerging topics from data obtained from Scopus.
Findings: A total of 6 topics were determined, where Topic 0 and Topic 3 had the highest similarity. At the same time, keyword analysis did not reveal any particularly prominent keywords in the 2020s.
Conclusion: The discussion on female librarians covers topics such as professional advancement, work-life balance, knowledge gaps in technology, stereotypes, and the correlation between these topics. This study provides an overview of text analysis that librarians can use to identify topics in a collection of texts, such as abstracts, and examine how different topics relate to each other, as a single document can reflect multiple topics.
Downloads
Introduction
Throughout history, women have been limited to employment opportunities in fields deemed suitable for their gender, including roles such as being a librarian.(Rubin, 2016)offers a few theories from a historical perspective about the predominance of women in American librarianship, particularly public librarianship, which may have contributed to the perception of passivity among librarians, as passivity was a cultural expectation for women well into the 20th century. As public libraries expanded in the 19th century, there was a growing demand for library workers. However, due to poor funding, libraries relied on staff members willing to work for low pay, and male library directors preferred hiring talented women for half the pay. Librarianship was seen as fitting the values of work for women at the time, which included personal improvement and the belief that books and reading could improve morals, akin to missionary work. These historical forces have left a lasting impact on librarianship, which continues to attract individuals who share these convictions, indicating that its service aspect is still deeply ingrained.
Not only does the majority of the librarian workforce comprise females, but they also dominate academic research in librarianship, indicating that this profession continues to be predominantly female.(Galbraith et al., 2019)stated, which drew upon data from the Association of Research Libraries (ARL) that the gender wage gap in academic libraries is showing signs of improvement. The study found that the adjusted pay gap between men and women in ARL Libraries was relatively modest and considerably smaller compared to other professions in the US. The research highlights that academic libraries have taken measures to tackle gender pay inequality. Nevertheless, there are still discrepancies in salaries between males and females across all tiers of research libraries despite the aforementioned discoveries(Howard et al., 2020).
Even today, women encounter numerous obstacles, particularly in leadership positions dominated by men. The societal stereotype of librarianship being a feminine profession has created a situation where men are discouraged from pursuing them, leading to a low representation of men in these fields. This stereotype has resulted in a vicious cycle where the underrepresentation of men further reinforces the perception that these fields are exclusively for women. Men interested in these professions may be deterred due to perceived gender expectations. As a result, the gender gap in these fields persists(Blackburn, 2015).
Literature Review
Female Librarian
The occupation of the librarian has historically been more closely linked with women, specifically. From historical data gained related to gender equality in libraries, according to(Silva & Galbraith, 2018), women have been identified as the most dominant gender in library works. Men only made up 17% of the overall proportion in academic libraries, while the rest were made up of women, as was reported in their article. It was mentioned that there is also a stereotype that women's jobs are lower-paying jobs than men's. This demonstrates the unfair perception that exists in works for women.
Another issue highlighted is the lack of women in the top positions in the library profession, as was documented by several previous studies; for example,(Blackburn, 2015)denoted females as a subject related to works that are seen as feminine and earn less than males, despite the fact that they make up the majority of the gender in librarianship. Other issues stated in the prior studies was that female librarians have typically been depicted negatively, often portrayed as timid, socially awkward individuals who prefer reading books to engaging in real-life experiences.
The study by(Rutledge, 2020)found that managing work responsibilities while caring for family and children was the most frequently mentioned barrier for women. Many participants explained that their partner's job took priority over their own or that they had to leave their jobs when their partners could not get positions. Caring for children while managing or pursuing management positions was also a common challenge, as women reported feeling guilty when they focused on work and experienced difficulty balancing careers and parenting. Although women were the majority in libraries, they were often overlooked as potential leaders or heads of libraries due to the stereotype that they were delicate and incapable of handling the demands of administrative roles.
Furthermore, another discussion regarding female gender for library professionals was surrounding areas of inclusivity and self-development.(Mars, 2018)found that the composition of the library profession today is a product of historical factors and stereotypes associated with librarians. Despite some progress, the majority of librarians are still women and they face persistent economic inequality and are underrepresented in leadership positions. As previously stated, women predominate among genders in the library world. Still, some research revealed that women must evolve if they are willing to receive the same respect and get more support and appreciation to bloom in library works.
Female in Library Positioning
Previous studies have conducted several initiatives to equalise the representation of women and men in libraries. More investigations also concentrate on the diversity phenomenon in the library; for example, to reflect society as a whole and promote more equity in the workplace, it is crucial to examine the ratio of female to male librarians(Morales et al., 2014);(Silva & Galbraith, 2018). Another study investigated the barriers to female gender being in the lead of library professionals; often, that study stated cultural context to be involved as a factor, along with the biases in terms
Abu-Tineh, A. M., Romanowski, M. H., Chaaban, Y., Alkhatib, H., Ghamrawi, N., & Alshaboul, Y. M. (2023). Career Advancement, Job Satisfaction, Career Retention, and Other Related Dimensions for Sustainability: A Perception Study of Qatari Public School Teachers. Sustainability, 15(5), 4370. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054370
ACRL Research Planning and Review Committee. (2018). 2018 top trends in academic libraries: A review of the trends and issues affecting academic libraries in higher education. College & Research Libraries News, 79(6), 286–300. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.79.6.286
Adekoya, C. O. (2020). Library leadership: Opinions and attributes about Nigerian women academic librarians breaking the glass ceiling. Library Management, 41(4/5), 221–233. https://doi.org/10.1108/LM-03-2020-0049
Adekoya, C. O., & Fasae, J. K. (2021). Mentorship in librarianship: Meeting the needs, addressing the challenges. The Bottom Line, 34(1), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1108/BL-09-2020-0063
Akpebu Adjah, O., & Van Der Walt, T. (2019). Career progression of female librarians in public university libraries in Ghana. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 51(2), 331–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000617742445
Allaoui, M., Kherfi, M. L., & Cheriet, A. (2020). Considerably Improving Clustering Algorithms Using UMAP Dimensionality Reduction Technique: A Comparative Study. In A. El Moataz, D. Mammass, A. Mansouri, & F. Nouboud (Eds.), Image and Signal Processing (pp. 317–325). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51935-3_34
Anunobi, C., Ukwoma, S., & Ukachi, N. B. (2012). Coping with the Challenges of the Digital World: The Experience of Nigerian Female Academic Library and Information Professionals (LIP). New Review of Academic Librarianship, 18(2), 127–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2012.708005
Ashiq, M., & Warraich, N. F. (2023). Challenges and strategies to attain leadership positions for female library professionals: A narrative review. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(4), 102743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102743
Awasthi, S., & Sukula, S. K. (2021). Reflections and Contemplations of Women professionals' Contributions: Impressions of Recent Research in the Journal of Documentation. 41(2).
Ballestra, L., & Cavaleri, P. (2016). Enhancing Financial Information Literacy in Italian Public Libraries: A Preliminary Study. In S. Kurbanoğlu, J. Boustany, S. Å piranec, E. Grassian, D. Mizrachi, L. Roy, & T. Çakmak (Eds.), Information Literacy: Key to an Inclusive Society (pp. 45–55). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52162-6_5
Bangani, S. (2024). Academic libraries' contribution to gender equality in a patriarchal, femicidal society. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 56(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006221127023
Biskup, P. (1994). Gender and status in Australian librarianship: Some issues. The Australian Library Journal, 43(3), 165–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049670.1994.10755685
Blackburn, H. (2015). Gender Stereotypes Male Librarians Face Today. Library Worklife, 12(9). Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/crisslibfacpub/18
Blei, D. M. (2012). Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55(4), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.1145/2133806.2133826
Burrington, G. A. (1984). 6. The Perceived Role and Status of Women in UK Librarianship. Library Management, 5(4), 32–36. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb054873
Cao, Q., Cheng, X., & Liao, S. (2022). A comparison study of topic modeling based literature analysis by using full texts and abstracts of scientific articles: A case of COVID-19 research. Library Hi Tech. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-03-2022-0144
Choji, T. T., Cobo, M. J., & Moral-Munoz, J. A. (2024). Is the scientific impact of the LIS themes gender-biased? A bibliometric analysis of the evolution, scientific impact, and relative contribution by gender from 2007 to 2022. Scientometrics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05005-3
Cockett, L. S. (1996). Writing for parents about children's literature in mass market publications, 1900-1950. Library Trends, 44(4), 794–812.
Crampsie, C., Neville, T., & Henry, D. (2020). Academic Librarian Publishing Productivity: An Analysis of Skills and Behaviors Leading to Success. College & Research Libraries, 81(2), 248–271. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.81.2.248
Dastani, M., Chelak, A. M., Ziaei, S., & Delghandi, F. (2022). Discovering Research Topics from Medical Librarianship and Information Using Text Mining. International Journal of Information Science and Management, 20(2), 201–216.
Delen, D., & Crossland, M. D. (2008). Seeding the survey and analysis of research literature with text mining. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(3), 1707–1720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.01.035
DeLong, K. (2013). Career Advancement and Writing about Women Librarians: A Literature Review. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 8(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.18438/B8CS4M
Ekoko, O. N., & Ikolo, V. E. (2021). Menstrual Hygiene Literacy Campaign Among Secondary School Girls in Rural Areas of Delta State, Nigeria. LibraryPhilosophyandPractice, Winter 2021. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5904
Eva, N., Líª, M.-L., & Sheriff, J. (2021). Less money, less children, and less prestige: Differences between male and female academic librarians. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(5), 102392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102392
Fennewald, J. (2007). The ACRL Conferences: A Profile of its Presenters. College & Research Libraries, 68(2), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.68.2.107
Galbraith, Q., Callister, A., & Kelley, H. (2019). Have Academic Libraries Overcome the Gender Wage Gap? An Analysis of Gender Pay Inequality. College & Research Libraries, 80(4), 470–484. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.80.4.470
Galbraith, Q., Fry, L., & Garrison, M. (2016). The Impact of Faculty Status and Gender on Employee Well-being in Academic Libraries. College & Research Libraries, 77(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.77.1.71
Gao, S., Pandya, S., Agarwal, S., & Sedoc, J. (2021). Topic Modeling for Maternal Health Using Reddit. Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Health Text Mining and Information Analysis, 69–76. Online: Association for Computational Linguistics. Retrieved from https://aclanthology.org/2021.louhi-1.8
Gladysz, B., Tran, T., Romero, D., Van Erp, T., Abonyi, J., & Ruppert, T. (2023). Current development on the Operator 4.0 and transition towards the Operator 5.0: A systematic literature review in light of Industry 5.0. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 70, 160–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2023.07.008
Grootendorst, M. (2022, March 11). BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedure. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.05794
Gul, S., Shah, T. A., Hamade, S. N., Mushtaq, R., & Koul, I. (2016). Effects of gender in library and information science research: A case study of The Electronic Library. The Electronic Library, 34(3), 488–503. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-08-2014-0126
Halman, A., & Oshlack, A. (2023, February 14). Catchii: Empowering literature review screening in healthcare [Preprint]. medRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.10.23285791
Howard, H. A., Habashi, M. H., & Reed, J. B. (2020). The Gender Wage Gap in Research Libraries. College & Research Libraries, 81(4), 662. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.81.4.662
Howlett, A. (2019). Differences in Work/life Balance and Stress at Work Between Male and Female Academic Librarians. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 14(4), 188–190. https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip29649
Hoyle, A., Goel, P., Peskov, D., Hian-Cheong, A., Boyd-Graber, J., & Resnik, P. (2021, October 27). Is Automated Topic Model Evaluation Broken?: The Incoherence of Coherence. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.02173
Islam, Md. N., Hu, G., Ashiq, M., & Ahmad, S. (2024). Exploring the landscape of big data applications in librarianship: A bibliometric analysis of research trends and patterns. Library Hi Tech. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-05-2023-0193
Kessler, J. S. (2017, April 20). Scattertext: A Browser-Based Tool for Visualizing how Corpora Differ. arXiv. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.00565
Kukushkin, K., Ryabov, Y., & Borovkov, A. (2022). Digital Twins: A Systematic Literature Review Based on Data Analysis and Topic Modeling. Data, 7(12), 173. https://doi.org/10.3390/data7120173
Lee, E., & Morfitt, P. (2020). Imposter Syndrome, Women in Technical Services, and Minority Librarians: The Shared Experience of Two Librarians of Color. Technical Services Quarterly, 37(2), 136–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2020.1728125
Lombard, E. (2018). Gender and Leadership in Academic Libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(2), 226–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.02.003
Luo, J., & Tang, R. (2024). Data competency for academic librarians: Evaluating present trends and future prospects. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 50(4), 102897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102897
Mars, P. (2018). Gender Demographics and Perception in Librarianship. School of Information Student Research Journal, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.31979/2575-2499.070203
Mazzei, D., & Ramjattan, R. (2022). Machine Learning for Industry 4.0: A Systematic Review Using Deep Learning-Based Topic Modelling. Sensors, 22(22), 8641. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22228641
McDowell, K. (2009). Surveying the Field: The Research Model of Women in Librarianship, 1882–1898. The Library Quarterly, 79(3), 279–300. https://doi.org/10.1086/599126
Morales, M., Knowles, E. C., & Bourg, C. (2014). Diversity, Social Justice, and the Future of Libraries. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 14(3), 439–451. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2014.0017
Murray, T. E. (2015). Trends in Special Libraries: Observations Based on Conference Content. Journal of Library Administration, 55(8), 658–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2015.1085249
Neigel, C. (2015). LIS Leadership and Leadership Education: A Matter of Gender. Journal of Library Administration, 55(7), 521–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2015.1076307
Neville, J. (2023). A mixed"methods analysis of stereotypical female librarian representation in memes. Social Science Quarterly, 104(5), 1082–1100. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13301
Olorunfemi, M., & Adekoya, C. O. (2023). Technostress and information and communication technology usage among librarians in Nigerian universities. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-02-2023-0047
Omotayo, B. O. (2006). Women and Conflict in the New Information Age. IFLA Journal, 32(4), 325–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0340035206074069
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International Journal of Surgery, 88, 105906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906
Rubin, R. (2016). Foundations of library and information science (Fourth edition). Chicago: ALA Neal-Schuman, an imprint of the American Library Association.
Rutledge, L. (2020). Leveling Up: Women Academic Librarians' Career Progression in Management Positions. College & Research Libraries, 81(7). https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.81.7.1143
Sakr, M. (2011). "Too high an ideal for the work required”? Minnie James and the Intellectual Life of the Librarian. Library & Information History, 27(3), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1179/175834911X13046881149240
Saleem, Q. U. A., & Ameen, K. (2021). The role of human environment in making a workplace congenial: A case of university libraries. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 70(8/9), 714–730. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-09-2020-0135
Sanches, T. (2022). Connecting New Trends and New Skills for Academic Librarians. In S. Kurbanoğlu, S. Å piranec, Y. Ünal, J. Boustany, & D. Kos (Eds.), Information Literacy in a Post-Truth Era (pp. 617–628). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99885-1_51
Siddique, N., Ur Rehman, S., Ahmad, S., Abbas, A., & Khan, M. A. (2023). Library and information science research in the Arab World: A bibliometric analysis 1951–2021. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication, 72(1/2), 138–159. https://doi.org/10.1108/GKMC-06-2021-0103
Silva, E., & Galbraith, Q. (2018). Salary Negotiation Patterns between Women and Men in Academic Libraries. College & Research Libraries, 79(3), 324–335. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.79.3.324
Simonetti, A., Albano, A., Plaia, A., & Tumminello, M. (2023). Ranking coherence in topic models using statistically validated networks. Journal of Information Science, 016555152211483. https://doi.org/10.1177/01655515221148369
Singh, V. K., Chayko, M., Inamdar, R., & Floegel, D. (2020). Female librarians and male computer programmers? Gender bias in occupational images on digital media platforms. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(11), 1281–1294. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24335
Terry, J. L. (1996). Authorship in "College & Research Libraries” Revisited: Gender, Institutional Affiliation, Collaboration. College & Research Libraries, 57(4), 377–383. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_57_04_377
Timakum, T., Kim, G., & Song, M. (2020). A data-driven analysis of the knowledge structure of library science with full-text journal articles. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 52(2), 345–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000618793977
Tsafe, A. G., Chiya, U., & Aminu, B. A. (2016). Scholarly Publications of Librarians in Universities in Nigeria: 2000 2012”A Bibliometric Analysis. Library Philosophy and Practice, Winter 2016. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1394
Wang, D. (2023). Bibliometric analyses and network mapping on the smart library in Web of Science from 2003 to 2021. Library Hi Tech. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHT-08-2022-0361
Westbrook, L. (2003). Information Needs and Experiences of Scholars in Women's Studies: Problems and Solutions. College & Research Libraries, 64(3), 192–209. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.64.3.192
Zhang, C., Wei, S., Zhao, Y., & Tian, L. (2023). Gender differences in research topic and method selection in library and information science: Perspectives from three top journals. Library & Information Science Research, 45(3), 101255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2023.101255
Zhang, Q., & Kozak, K. (2019). Quick Understanding Our Engineering Faculty Research Needs Using Topic Modeling. 2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings, 33223. Tampa, Florida: ASEE Conferences. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--33223
Copyright (c) 2024 Savira Arumdini, Ria Ariani, Faizhal Arif Santosa

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Record and Library Journal by Unair is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
3. The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC BY-SA).
4. The Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC BY-SA) license allows re-distribution and re-use of a licensed work on the conditions that the creator is appropriately credited and that any derivative work is made available under "the same, similar or a compatible license”. Other than the conditions mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.