Information experience of undergraduate students when optimizing google search for their study
Downloads
Background of the study: Google has become the most popular search engine worldwide and its name has its own merit within information search, as such when people are searching for information they would most often say ‘google it' rather than ‘look for it'.
Purpose: The present research employs information experience perspective that investigates students of Universitas Diponegoro when they are using Google search to help complete their assignments.
Method: The research method used to capture the information experience of Universitas Diponegoro students when using Google to look for information associated with their studies was the qualitative research method. Semi-structured interviews were used in this study to explore further information experience of students in exploring information using the Google search engine
Findings: The findings revealed that undergraduate students have their own techniques when using Google search. They are well familiar with formulating search queries; the majority being able to take on this stage of task easily. However, students found it challenging when they have to start evaluating which of the search results would give the most relevant information to help with their assignments.
Conclusions: Students' prior knowledge appeared to be the governing factor of how well they are able to determine which of the compiled information sources are best for their study. Every student has their own best approach and experience to optimize Google. Generally, it was found that the students within this study had similar ways in formulating keywords to search for information on Google and were only different in certain details of experiences.
Downloads
Alotaibi, F. A. A., Johnson, F., & Rowley, J. (2023). Google Scholar or University Digital Libraries: A comparison of student perceptions and intention to use. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 55(4), 906–920. https://doi.org/10.1177/09610006221111197
Alotaibi, F., & Johnson, F. (2020). Why we like Google Scholar: postgraduate students' perceptions of factors influencing their intention to use. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 72(4), 587–603. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-10-2019-0304
Amani, N., Hadiapurwa, A., Khaerunnisa Syafitri, N., & Nugraha, H. . (2023). The role of @literarybase X account in fulfilling information literation needs. Record and Library Journal, 9(2), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.20473/rlj.V9-I2.2023.187-197
Bloom, B., & Deyrup, M. M. (2015). The SHU Research Logs: Student Online Search Behaviors Trans-scripted. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(5), 593–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.07.002
Borlund, P., & Dreier, S. (2014). An investigation of the search behaviour associated with Ingwersen's three types of information needs. Information Processing and Management, 50(4), 493–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2014.03.001
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology Virginia. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2(3), 77–101.
Bruce, C., Davis, K., Hughes, H., Partridge, H., & Stoodley, I. (2014). Information experience: Contemporary perspectives. Library and Information Science, 9, 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1876-056220140000010001
Cho, O.-H., & Hwang, K.-H. (2019). Effects of Simulation Education with Problem-based Learning on Information Literacy, Self-directed Learning Ability, and Academic Self-efficacy of Nursing Students. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(4), 239–247.
Demasson, A. (2014). Information literacy and the serious leisure participant : variation in the experience of using information to learn Final Seminar PhD Candidature Principal Supervisor : Professor Helen Partridge Associate Supervisor : Professor Christine Bruce [Queensland University of Technology]. https://eprints.qut.edu.au/78615/
Duffin, K. I. (2020). Comparing Open Access Search Tools to Improve Interlibrary Loan Fulfillment Efficiency. Technical Services Quarterly, 37(4), 415–431. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2020.1810442
Fitzgerald, S. R. (2018). Serving a Fragmented Field: Information Seeking in Higher Education. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 44(3), 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2018.03.007
Georgas, H. (2014). Google vs. the Library (Part II): Student Search Patterns and Behaviors when Using Google and a Federated Search Tool. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 14(4), 503–532. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2014.0034
Georgas, H. (2015). Google vs. the Library (Part III): Assessing the Quality of Sources Found by Undergraduates. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 15(1), 133–161. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2015.0012
Golub, K., Tan, X., Liu, Y. H., & Tyrkkö, J. (2023). Online subject searching of humanities PhD students at a Swedish university. Journal of Documentation, 79(7), 308–329. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-03-2023-0044
Heriyanto, & Anggitia, S. (2021). Information experience of village library staff. Information Development, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669211030600
Heriyanto, & Hariyati, M. (2020). Students' Information Resources during Their Involvement with Research Projects: Indonesia setting. Library Philosophy and Practice. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac
Loan, F. A., & Sheikh, S. (2018). Is Google scholar really scholarly ? Library Hi Tech News, 35(3), 7–9. https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-11-2017-0078
Miller, F., Davis, K., & Partridge, H. (2019). Everyday life information experiences in Twitter: a grounded theory. Information Research, 24(2), paper 824.
Perruso, C. (2016). Undergraduates Use of Google vs. Library Resources: A Four-Year Cohort Study. College & Research Libraries, 77(5), 614–630. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.77.5.614
Prasetyawan, Y. Y. (2019). Pengalaman Informasi (Information Experience) Sebuah Alternatif Perspektif Komprehensif dalam Kajian Ilmu Informasi dan Perpustakaan. ANUVA: Jurnal Kajian Budaya Dan Ilmu Perpustakaan, 3(2), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.14710/anuva.3.2.101-108
Prasetyawan, Y. Y., & Krismayani, I. (2019). Kajian Perilaku Informasi Mahasiswa: Studi Kasus Mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Budaya Universitas Diponegoro. Baca: Jurnal Dokumentasi Dan Informasi, 40(2). https://doi.org/10.14203/j.baca.v40i2.480
Pulikowski, A., & Matysek, A. (2021). The Journal of Academic Librarianship Searching for LIS scholarly publications : A comparison of search results. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 47(5), 102417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102417
Savolainen, R. (2017). Information need as trigger and driver of information seeking: a conceptual analysis. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 69(1), 2–21. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-08-2016-0139
Sayyad Abdi, E., Partridge, H., & Bruce, C. (2016). Web designers and developers experiences of information literacy: A phenomenographic study. Library and Information Science Research, 38(4), 353–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2016.11.008
Sin, S. C. J. (2015). Demographic Differences in International Students' Information Source Uses and Everyday Information Seeking Challenges. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(4), 466–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2015.04.003
Singh, V. K., Srichandan, S. S., Piryani, R., Kanaujia, A., & Bhattacharya, S. (2023). Google Scholar as a pointer to open full-text sources of research articles: A useful tool for researchers in regions with poor access to scientific literature. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 15(4), 450–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2022.2124689
Tan, C. (2022). The curious case of regulating false news on Google. Computer Law and Security Review, 46(October 2021), 105738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105738
Todorinova, L. (2015). Wikipedia and undergraduate research trajectories. New Library World, 116(3/4), 201–212. https://doi.org/10.1108/NLW-07-2014-0086
Wu, M. Der, & Chen, S. C. (2014). Graduate students appreciate Google Scholar, but still find use for libraries. Electronic Library, 32(3), 375–389. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-08-2012-0102
Yates, C., & Partridge, H. (2014). Exploring information literacy during a natural disaster: The 2011 Brisbane flood. Library and Information Science, 9, 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1876-056220140000010006
Copyright (c) 2024 Yanuar Yoga Prasetyawan, Heriyanto, Mecca Arfa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Record and Library Journal by Unair is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
3. The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC BY-SA).
4. The Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC BY-SA) license allows re-distribution and re-use of a licensed work on the conditions that the creator is appropriately credited and that any derivative work is made available under "the same, similar or a compatible license”. Other than the conditions mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.
