Mapping the research landscape of recommender systems for digital libraries
A bibliometric analysis of two decades (2004-2023)
Background of the study: In today's information-rich environment, researchers face the difficulty of managing information overload and struggle to identify meaningful information among a plethora of choices. A recommender system plays a crucial role in assisting users in discovering relevant information from a digital library.
Purpose: This study aims to provide a bibliometric analysis of research publications on recommender systems for digital libraries.
Method: The research method involved the quantitative bibliometric approach to analyse the research publications from the Web of Science and Scopus databases using Biblioshiny. The dataset retrieved comprises 374 documents published between the period of 2004-2023.
Findings: The study's findings highlight that the number of publications was notably high in 2009 and 2018 within the analyzed period. The most significant contributors are Porcel C, Herrera-Viedma E, and Beel J. There is a considerable international collaboration between the countries- China, USA, and Germany.
Conclusions: This study indicates an emerging interest in recommender systems for digital libraries with the continuous evolution of new recommendation models. There is a huge potential for research considering the availability of multimodal data, the continuous evolution of new technologies such as deep learning, and opportunities for the development of an architecture for integrating different digital libraries.
Downloads
Introduction
We live in a society that is overwhelmed with an unprecedented amount of information. The rapid expansion of information technologies serves as a catalyst for the explosive growth of digital information(Anas & Salim, 2023). As a result, researchers consistently find themselves engaged in an ongoing battle against information overload and encounter different challenges to discover relevant information precisely when needed or aligned with their preferences. This problem appears especially in the context of the library where the rate of information overload exceeds users’ processing capabilities(Porcel et al., 2018). As a result, traditional library systems have transformed into smart and digital libraries. The application of digital libraries extends across various contexts; however, our study specifically concentrates on their usage within an academic environment. University Digital Libraries (UDL) surpasses traditional libraries by providing a variety of services and resources, such as digital collections, online databases, and multimedia data to meet the different needs of students, faculty, and staff in their learning, teaching, and research endeavors(Al-Qallaf & Ridha, 2019);(Kato et al., 2021).
This constant fight against information overload requires the development of effective strategies and tools. The Recommender Systems (RS) plays a crucial role in tailoring information to individual research interests, aiding in the battle of overwhelming data by providing personalized recommendations(Adomavicius et al., 2021);(Burke et al., 2015). This system assists users in navigating relevant information based on their past preferences and provides personalized suggestions for various library resources. These recommendations encompass a wide range of recommendations including book(Mo et al., 2019-08), research article/paper(Magara et al., 2017-12), journal(Ghosal et al., 2019-06), audio(Roy et al., 2020), and many more within digital libraries.
Various types of RS have been implemented within digital libraries based on fuzzy linguistic modelling(Tejeda-Lorente et al., 2014), collaborative filtering(Shen, 2018);(Nugraha et al., 2020), and hybrid approaches(Amolochitis, 2018). The users of digital libraries have varied interests and to deal with these unpredictable needs, some attempts have been made to model and understand user behavior through implicit user activities to improve recommendations for digital library services(Akbar et al., 2014-09);(Liu, 2022). However, the quality of recommended items remains a challenge in many existing approaches.(Tejeda-Lorente et al., 2014)addressed this gap by proposing a novel recommender system based on item quality, incorporating a fuzzy linguistic approach, and testing it within a UDL to enhance users' access to relevant research resources. Despite the progress made, personalized recommendations in digital libraries still face challenges such as cold start problems. To address this issue,(Tejeda-Lorente et al., 2018)incorporated a fuzzy linguistic approach utilizing bibliometrics to reduce the necessity for user interaction.(Porcel et al., 2017)examined various proposals for RS to improve information access, with a focus on identifying the best fuzzy linguistic modeling RS to assist users in academic library services.
Recent advancements have been made in RS within digital libraries based on user preferences utilizing the Latent Dirichlet Allocation model to recommend items(Zhao, 2021), ontology-based multi-attribute collaborative filtering RS to enhance the access to learning resources within digital libraries(Senthil Kumaran & Latha, 2023).(Liu, 2021-09)proposed a personalized RS using SOM neural networks to enhance the web access behavior of users for UDL. Despite the ongoing development of various RS in the field of digital libraries, the existing literature remains somewhat limited. This field is still in its nascent stage, and there are very few articles, especially in UDL. Thus, we consider the landscape of the digital library to take into account the potential for the development of a unified RS model for digital libraries.
To the best of our knowledge, nevertheless, so far, no research has been conducted to study the bibliometric analysis of RS for digital libraries. The measurement of research using bibliometrics typically focuses on topics, scientific fields, and publications(Muntiah & Dewi, 2023). Our research addresses the gap by analyzing previous studies, offering important insights, and highlighting potential research opportunities within the field.
The objective of our study is to provide an overview of the field’s current state, progress, and influence through bibliometric analysis. The extensive datasets were obtained from the Web of Science (WoS) and Scopus covering a span of two decades (2004-2023). The analysis not only investigates publication trends and collaboration patterns within the field but also underscores the need for a unified RS framework for digital libraries. This need is highlighted, especially in the context of UDL, where the current landscape displays a diverse spectrum of RS implementations. To confront this inevitable challenge, this study aims to provide valuable insights that have the potential to shape the development and standardization of RS by addressing the unique requirements and complexities of academic environments within the UDL. This research would facilitate further research endeavors. The following research questions to ensure the continuity of RS for digital libraries:
RQ1. How has the annual scientific publication growth in RS for digital libraries evolved over the past two decades (2004-2023)?
RQ2. Who are the most prolific authors in this relevant field?
RQ3. What is the structure of the co-citation network between authors working in this field over the past two decades (2004-2023)?
RQ4. Which countries make the largest contributions based on publications and citations in this field?
RQ5. Which keywords are the most frequently
Adomavicius, G., Bockstedt, J., Curley, S., & Zhang, J. (2021). Effects of personalized and aggregate top-N recommendation lists on user preference ratings. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 39(2), 1-38.
Ajij, M., Roy, D. S., & Pratihar, S. (2023). Automated generation of text handles from scanned images of scholarly articles for indexing in digital archive. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82(15), 22373-22404.
Akbar, M., Shaffer, C. A., Fan, W., & Fox, E. A. (2014, September). Recommendation based on Deduced Social Networks in an educational digital library. In IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 29-38). IEEE.
Almaghrabi, M., & Chetty, G. (2020, December). Deep Machine Learning Digital library recommendation system based on Metadata for Arabic and English Languages. In 2020 IEEE Asia-Pacific Conference on Computer Science and Data Engineering (CSDE) (pp. 1-6). IEEE
Al-Qallaf, C. L., & Ridha, A. (2019). A comprehensive analysis of academic library websites: design, navigation, content, services, and web 2.0 tools. International Information & Library Review, 51(2), 93-106.
Amolochitis, E. (2018). Algorithms and Applications for Academic Search, Recommendation and Quantitative Association Rule Mining. River Publishers.
Anas, A., & Salim, T. A. (2023). Digital curation at the university: Systematic literature review analysis with a bibliometric approach through the scopus database for the period 2012-2022. Record and Library Journal, 9(2), 347-358
Awal, G. K., & Bharadwaj, K. K. (2014). Team formation in social networks based on collective intelligence–an evolutionary approach. Applied intelligence, 41, 627-648.
Awal, G. K., & Bharadwaj, K. K. (2019). Leveraging collective intelligence for behavioral prediction in signed social networks through evolutionary approach. Information Systems Frontiers, 21, 417-439.
Beierle, F., Aizawa, A., & Beel, J. (2017). Exploring choice overload in related-article recommendations in digital libraries. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.00393.
Burke, R., O'Mahony, M. P., & Hurley, N. J. (2015). Robust collaborative recommendation. Recommender systems handbook, 961-995.
Chu, Z., Hao, H., Ouyang, X., Wang, S., Wang, Y., Shen, Y., ... & Li, S. (2023). Leveraging large language models for pre-trained recommender systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.10837.
Dias, L. L., Barrére, E., & de Souza, J. F. (2021). The impact of semantic annotation techniques on content-based video lecture recommendation. Journal of Information Science, 47(6), 740-752.
Fu, Q., Fu, J., & Wang, D. (2022, January). Deep Learning and Data Mining for Book Recommendation: Retrospect and Expectation. In 2022 14th International Conference on Computer Research and Development (ICCRD) (pp. 60-64). IEEE.
Ghosal, T., Chakraborty, A., Sonam, R., Ekbal, A., Saha, S., & Bhattacharyya, P. (2019, June). Incorporating full text and bibliographic features to improve scholarly journal recommendation. In 2019 ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL) (pp. 374-375). IEEE.
Kato, A., Kisangiri, M., & Kaijage, S. (2021). A review development of digital library resources at university level. Education Research International, 2021, 1-13.
Liu, M. (2022). Personalized Recommendation System Design for Library Resources through Deep Belief Networks. Mobile Information Systems, 2022.
Liu, Y. (2021, September). Construction of personalized recommendation system of university library based on SOM neural network. In 2021 4th International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Aided Education (pp. 2199-2203).
Magara, M. B., Ojo, S., & Zuva, T. (2017, December). Toward altmetric-driven research-paper recommender system framework. In 2017 13th International Conference on Signal-Image Technology & Internet-Based Systems (SITIS) (pp. 63-68). IEEE.
Mo, D., Chen, X. G., Duan, S., Wang, L. D., Wu, Q., Zhang, M., & Xie, L. (2019, August). Personalized resource recommendation based on collaborative filtering algorithm. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1302, No. 2, p. 022025). IOP Publishing.
Muntiah, A., & Dewi, A. O. P. (2023). Research Dissemination of Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI) 2017-2020: A Bibliometric Profile. Record and Library Journal, 9(2), 334-346
Nugraha, E., Ardiansyah, T., Junaeti, E., & Riza, L. S. (2020). Enhanced Digital Library with Book Recommendations Based on Collaborative Filtering. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, 34(Special Issue).
Omisore, M. O., & Samuel, O. W. (2014). Personalized recommender system for digital libraries. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 9(1), 18-32.
Otegi, A., Agirre, E., & Clough, P. (2014, September). Personalised PageRank for making recommendations in digital cultural heritage collections. In IEEE/ACM Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (pp. 49-52). IEEE.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International journal of surgery, 88, 105906.
Porcel, C., Ching-Lopez, A., Bernabe-Moreno, J., Tejeda-Lorente, A., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2017). Fuzzy Linguistic Recommender Systems for the Selective Diffusion of Information in Digital Libraries. Journal of Information Processing Systems, 13(4).
Porcel, C., Ching-López, A., Tejeda-Lorente, A., Bernabé-Moreno, J., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2018). Analysis of different proposals to improve the dissemination of information in university digital libraries. In Advances in Fuzzy Logic and Technology 2017: Proceedings of: EUSFLAT-2017–The 10th Conference of the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology, September 11-15, 2017, Warsaw, Poland IWIFSGN'2017–The Sixteenth International Workshop on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and Generalized Nets, September 13-15, 2017, Warsaw, Poland, Volume 3 10 (pp. 195-206). Springer International Publishing.
Rakhmatullaev, M., Normatov, S., & Bekkamov, F. (2023, June). Fuzzy Relations Based Intelligent Information Retrieval for Digital Library Users. In ENVIRONMENT. TECHNOLOGIES. RESOURCES. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 80-83).
Rhanoui, M., Mikram, M., Yousfi, S., Kasmi, A., & Zoubeidi, N. (2022). A hybrid recommender system for patron driven library acquisition and weeding. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences, 34(6), 2809-2819.
Roy, S., Biswas, M., & De, D. (2020). iMusic: a session-sensitive clustered classical music recommender system using contextual representation learning. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 79, 24119-24155.
Schubotz, M., Greiner-Petter, A., Scharpf, P., Meuschke, N., Cohl, H. S., & Gipp, B. (2018, May). Improving the representation and conversion of mathematical formulae by considering their textual context. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM/IEEE on joint conference on digital libraries (pp. 233-242).
Senthil Kumaran, V., & Latha, R. (2023). Towards personal learning environment by enhancing adaptive access to digital library using ontology-supported collaborative filtering. Library Hi Tech, 41(6), 1658-1675.
Shen, Y. H. (2018). Design of Digital Network Shared Learning Platform based on SCORM Standard. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(7).
Shi, Y., & Zhu, Y. (2020). Research on aided reading system of digital library based on text image features and edge computing. IEEE Access, 8, 205980-205988.
Smith, J., Weeks, D., Jacob, M., Freeman, J., & Magerko, B. (2019, March). Towards a Hybrid Recommendation System for a Sound Library. In IUI workshops (Vol. 19).
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of business research, 104, 333-339.
Sonboli, N., Burke, R., Liu, Z., & Mansoury, M. (2020, September). Fairness-aware Recommendation with librecauto. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (pp. 594-596).
Stiller, J., Petras, V., Gäde, M., & Isaac, A. (2014). Automatic enrichments with controlled vocabularies in Europeana: Challenges and consequences. In Digital Heritage. Progress in Cultural Heritage: Documentation, Preservation, and Protection: 5th International Conference, EuroMed 2014, Limassol, Cyprus, November 3-8, 2014. Proceedings 5 (pp. 238-247). Springer International Publishing.
Tejeda-Lorente, A., Bernabé-Moreno, J., Porcel, C., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2014a). Integrating quality criteria in a fuzzy linguistic recommender system for digital libraries. Procedia Computer Science, 31, 1036-1043.
Tejeda-Lorente, A., Bernabé-Moreno, J., Porcel, C., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2018). Using bibliometrics and fuzzy linguistic modeling to deal with cold start in recommender systems for digital libraries. In Advances in Fuzzy Logic and Technology 2017: Proceedings of: EUSFLAT-2017–The 10th Conference of the European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology, September 11-15, 2017, Warsaw, Poland IWIFSGN'2017–The Sixteenth International Workshop on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and Generalized Nets, September 13-15, 2017, Warsaw, Poland, Volume 3 10 (pp. 393-404). Springer International Publishing.
Tejeda-Lorente, Á., Porcel, C., Peis, E., Sanz, R., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2014b). A quality based recommender system to disseminate information in a university digital library. Information Sciences, 261, 52-69.
Troussas, C., Krouska, A., Koliarakis, A., & Sgouropoulou, C. (2023). Harnessing the power of user-centric artificial intelligence: Customized recommendations and personalization in hybrid recommender systems. Computers, 12(5), 109.
Zhao, L. (2021). Personalized recommendation by using fused user preference to construct smart library. Internet Technology Letters, 4(3), e273.
Zhao, Z., Fan, W., Li, J., Liu, Y., Mei, X., Wang, Y., ... & Li, Q. (2024). Recommender systems in the era of large language models (llms). IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.
Copyright (c) 2024 Gaganmeet Kaur Awal, Ujjwal Tehlan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Record and Library Journal by Unair is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
3. The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC BY-SA).
4. The Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC BY-SA) license allows re-distribution and re-use of a licensed work on the conditions that the creator is appropriately credited and that any derivative work is made available under "the same, similar or a compatible license”. Other than the conditions mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.