Evaluating Forestry Holding of Cendana Library's Collection Using Conspectus
Unduhan
Background of the study: Evaluating collection is required by libraries to assess the strengths and the weaknesses of collections. This research gives a benefit for libraries to improve their collection development policies. Thus, the libraries can provide adequate numbers of collections to meet the patrons' demands.
Purpose: The purpose of this report is to evaluate the forestry holdings in the Cendana library of Forest Research Institute Kupang (FRIK) by using conspectus.
Method: This research is an explanatory study cases in order to describe strength and weakness of forestry holding at Cendana library. The evaluator uses the Australian conspectus due to relevancy. The conspectus has several techniques for collecting data. A checklist is used by evaluator to evaluate monographs and electronic books. In addition, the evaluator evaluates the existing collection strengths (ECS), chronological coverages, languages, and physical conditions. The evaluator records these components into the evaluative worksheet.
Findings: The result reveals that the forestry holdings in Cendana Library of Forest Research Institute Kupang (FRIK) has conspectus levels in 1b. Although type of the languages become a strength, but the quantity is a weakness. The data shows that the size level of forestry holdings in the Cendana Library of Forest Research Institute Kupang (FRIK) is in the level 1 b.
Conclusion: In conclusion, the collection weakness is in books' quantities. The limited number of forestry books enforces the conspectus levels of forestry holdings in a low level (1b). Meanwhile, strengths of existing collection are the equal portions between foreign language in English and Bahasa and the physical condition of books. It is recommended that Cendana' library should increase the numbers of collections through procurement or book's exchange program.
Unduhan
Gregory, V. (2014). Collection Development and Management for 21st Century Library Collections: An Introduction. New Delhi: DBS Imprint.
Gwen, N., & Mosher, P. (n.d.). Coordinating collection development: The RLG conspectus.
Henty, M. (1992). Australian Conspactus Manual: A Collection Assessment Guide. Canberra: Australian Council of Libraries and Information services.
Maslahah, K. (2015). Evaluasi Pemanfaatan Koleksi Perpustakaan dengan Menggunakan Analisis Sitasi Terhadap Skripsi Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Agama Islam Tahun 2011 di Pusat Perpustakaan IAIN Surakarta. LIBRARIA: Jurnal Perpustakaan, 3(1), 1–20.
Muzdalifah, F. (2011). Evaluasi Pemanfaatan Dan Ketersediaan Koleksi Pada Perpustakaan Program Pascasarjana Uin Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta (Analisis Sitasi atas Penulisan Tesis Tahun 2006) (UIN Sunan Kalijaga). Retrieved from http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/5512/
Powell, R., & Connaway, L. S. (2004). Basic research methods for librarians. (4th ed.). Wesport: Librraies Unlimited.
Soendari, T. (sine anno). Teknik Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif. Presented at the Bandung. Retrieved from http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/FIP/JUR._PEND._LUAR_BIASA/195602141980032-TJUTJU_SOENDARI/Power_Point_Perkuliahan/Penelitian_PKKh/Teknik_analisis_dt.kual.ppt_%
William, P., & Halvonik. (2004). Collection management : assessing & weeding the foreign language collection. Collection Undergraduate Libraries, 11(2), 103–122.
Record and Library Journal by Unair is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
3. The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC BY-SA).
4. The Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC BY-SA) license allows re-distribution and re-use of a licensed work on the conditions that the creator is appropriately credited and that any derivative work is made available under "the same, similar or a compatible license”. Other than the conditions mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.
