In Vitro Cytotoxicity Test Reveals Non-toxic of Waste-based Scaffold on Human Hepatocyte Cells
Downloads
Scaffold, as one of the components for bone tissue engineering, requires formulated biomaterials that are both structurally and compositively similar to bone composition. Among others, chitosan, gelatin and chondroitin sulfate are known as potential candidates for scaffold composites that can be easily obtained from waste-based resources. This study aims to investigate the cytotoxicity of different scaffold composition and concentration regimes derived from waste-based chitosan, gelatine and chondroitin sulfate, in vitro. The composition regimes used were (Chitosan : Gelatin : Chondroitin Sulfate) 50 : 50 : 0 (A); 50 : 40 :10 (B); 50 : 35 : 15 (C); 50 : 30 : 20 (D); 50 : 25 : 25 (E). Meanwhile, the final concentrations of scaffold used were 2000, 1000, 500, 250, 100, 10 and 0,1 mg/ml. The different compositions and concentrations of scaffold was tested against Hepatocellular Carcinoma (Huh7it / Human Hepatocyte It). After 48-hour incubation in the scaffold solution, the percentage of cell viability was evaluated using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2yl)-5(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2- (4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (MTT) assay. The result shows that there is no difference observed among different scaffold compositions on the cell viability (p > 0.05). However, different concentrations of scaffold show significant differences in cell viability in composition C and E (p < 0.01), suggesting possible dose- dependent effect of scaffold on cell viability. Overall, all the waste-based scaffold compositions show no toxicity against the Hepatocellular Carcinoma cells as exhibited by the cell viability that is above 70%, at least with the concentration up to 2000 mg/ml.
Burge, K.Y., Hannah, L., Eckert, J.V., Gunasekaran, A, and Chaaban, H., 2019. The protective influence of chondroitin sulfate, a component of human milk, on intestinal bacterial invasion and translocation. Journal of human lactation. 35(3), pp. 538–549. http:/doi.org/10,1177/089034419845338
Cahu, T.B., Silva, R.A., Silvia, R.P.F, Silva, M.M., Arruda, I.R.S., Silva, J.F., Costa, R.M.B., Santos, S.D., Nader, H.B., Bezzera, R.S., 2017. Evaluation of chitosan-based film containing gelatin, chondroitin 4 sulfate and ZnO for wound healing. Appl Biochem Biotechnol, 183(3), pp. 765-777. http://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-017-2462-z
Cahyani, S.L., 2019. Glutaraldehyde cytotoxicity test on chitosan gelatin scaffold against the viability of BHK (Baby Hamster Kidney)-21 fibroblas cells by MTT test. Thesis. Faculty of Pharmacy. Airlangga University. p. 57.
Duconseille, A., Astruc, T., Quintana, N., Meersman, F., and Sante- Lhoutellier, V., 2015. Gelatin structure and composition linked to hard capsule dissolution: A review. J. Food Hydrocoll. vol. 43, p.363. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.06.006
Escobar-Sierra, D.M., Martins, J., and Ossa-Orozco, C.P., 2015. Chitosan/ hydroxyapatite scaffolds for tissue engineering manufacturing method effect comparison. Rev. Fac.Ing. Univ. Antioquia, p. 26. http://doi.org/10.17533/udea.redin.n75a04
Gunatillake, P., Mayadunne, R., Adhikari, R., 2006. Recent developments in biodegradable synthetic polymers. Biotechnology Annual Review, 12, p. 47. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1387-2656(06)12009-8
Hartatik, Y.D., Nuriyah, L., dan Iswarin., 2014. Effect of chitosan composition on mechanical and biodegradable properties of bioplastic. Essay. Brawijaya University Repository. p. 1. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/159022-ID-pengaruh- komposisi-kitosan-terhadap-sifa.pdf
Henrotin, Y., Mathy, M., Sanchez, C., and Lambert, C., 2010. Chondroitin sulfate in the treatment osteoarthritis: from in vitro studies to clinical recommendations. Therapeutic Advance in Musculosketal Disease, 2(6), p. 345. https://doi.org/10.1177/1759720X10383076
Jerosch, J., 2011. Effects of glucosamine and chondroitin sulfate on cartilage metabolism in OA: Outlook on other nutrient partners especially omega-3 fatty acids. International Journal of Rheumatology, 3, p. 25. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/969012
Juliasti, R., Legowo, A.M., Pramono, Y.B., 2015. Utilization of goat leg bone waste as a gelatin source by soaking with hydrochloric acid. Journal of food technoligy applications, 4(1), p. 5. http://doi.org/10.17728/jatp.2015.01
Kartikasari, N., Yuliati, A., and Listana, I., 2016. Compressive strength and porosity tests on bovine hydroxyapatite-gelatin-chitosan scaffold. Dental journal, 49(3), p. 153. http://doi.org/10.20473/j.djmkg.v49.i3.p153-157
Kavya, K.C., Dixit, R., Jayakumar, R., Nair, S.V., and Chennazhi, K.P., 2012. Synthesis and characterization of chitosan / chondroitin sulfate / Nano-SiO2 composite scaffold for bone tissue engineering. Journal of biomedical nanotechnology, 8, p. 149. http://doi.org/10.1166jbn.2012.1363
Levengood, S.K.L. and Zhan, M., 2014. Chitosan-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Journal material chemistry B, 2, p. 3161. http://doi.org/10.1039/c4tb00027g
Neves, M.I., Araujo, M., Moroni, L., Da Silva, R.M.P, Barrias, C.C., 2020. Glycosaminoglycan-inspired biomaterial for the development of bioactive hydrogel networks. Journal molecules MDPI. 25, p. 26. http://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25040978
O'Brein, F.J., 2011. Biomaterials and saffolds for tissue engineering. Materials today journal. 14(3), p. 4-6. http://doi.org/10.1016/s1369-7021(11)70058-x
Peng, L., Cheng, X.R., Wang, J.W., Xu, D.X., and Wang, G., 2006. Preparation and evaluation of porous chitosan/ collagen scaffolds for periodontal tissue engineering. Journal of bioactive and compatible polymer. 21(3), p. 207. http://doi.org/10.1177/0883911506065100
Pratiwi, Y.N., 2020. Cytotoxicity test of scaffold chitosan, gelatin, chondroitin sulfate by using BHK-21, in Vitro. Essay. p. 9.
Puspitaningrum, Y., 2015. Detection of cattle gelatin DNA and swine gelatin in vitamin C gummy simulation using real time PCR for halal analysis. Thesis. p.7.
Siagan, C. 2014. Effects of Glucosamine-chondroitin sulfate combination, glucosamine-chondroitin sulfate-methylsulfonymethane combination, and placebo on kell-joint osteoarthritis patients, degrees of Kellgren, Lawrence I and II. Thesis. p.10.
Singh, J.A., Noorbaloonchi, S., MacDonald, R., and Maxwell, L.J., 2016. Chondroitin for oteoarthritis. Journal HHS, p. 4. http://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005614.pub2
Sukma, S., S.E. Lusiana, Masruri, and Suratmo., 2014. Chitosan from the local crab Portunus pelagicus from Probolinggo Indonesia. Chemistry student journal. 2(2), p. 506.
Venkatesan, J.C., Kim, S.K., Wong, T.W., 2015. Chitosan and its application as tissue engineering scaffolds. Nanotechnology aplication for tissue engineering. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-32889-0.00009-1
Wijayanti, T.R., 2016. The effect of chondroitin sulfate composition variations on the characteristics of chitosan-chondroitin sulfate / hydroxyapatite scaffold composites as bone graft candidates. Essay, p. 24-26.
Yuan, H., Xue, J.,Qian, B., Chen, H., Zhu, and Lan, Z.M., 2016. Preparation and antifouling property of polyurethane film modified by chondroitin sulfate. Applied surface science. 394, p. 403–413. http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.10.083
1. The copyright of this journal belongs to the Editorial Board, based on the author's consent, while the moral rights of the publication belong to the author(s).
2. The formal legal aspect of journal accessibility refers to the same Creative Common Attribution + Noncommercial + ShareAlike (CC BY-NC-SA), implying that publication can be used for non-commercial purposes in its original form.
3. Every publication (printed/electronic) is open access for educational, research and library purposes. In addition to the objectives stated above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright infringement