User awareness of knowledge management practices of public university libraries in Bangladesh
A study
Unduhan
Background of the study: Users of university libraries frequently have high expectations for the support services offered by the library. The goals of KM are to enhance library services, generate more with fewer resources, prevent duplication of effort, and take advantage of already existing knowledge.
Purpose: The main aim of this research is to recognize the user awareness of Knowledge Management (KM) Practices of public university libraries in Bangladesh.
Method: The present research used quantitative methods. A total of 1,060 printed questionnaires were distributed among undergraduate (UG) and postgraduate (PG) students of five public university libraries in Bangladesh using a simple random sampling technique. Out of 1,060 questionnaires, 811 usable questionnaires were returned, giving a response of 76.5%.
Findings: The study found that users' familiarity with KM is moderately low. They learned about KM through courses provided by their respective departments and independent study through research literature. It was also found that lack of awareness, problems with organizational culture, improper technology deployment, and inadequate support from management are the challenges related to KM practice in public university libraries in Bangladesh.
Conclusion: Finally, the research presented managerial and practical implications with further research directions.
Unduhan
Introduction
Bangladesh is a developing country with better prospects for sharing knowledge and managing resources in its knowledge-driven institutions like libraries and information centers(Igbinovia & Ikenwe, 2017). KM in organizations includes planning, initiation, development, and integration(Arrau, 2015). As(Akter & Banik, 2019)mentioned, KM in an organization plays a significant role in the organization’s success. There is a need to reshape university libraries' structures to improve user services. The primary goal of KM is to encourage university libraries to be more intelligent in their activities and internal operations.(A. et al., 2014)claimed that KM improves library operational effectiveness by facilitating more accessible access to information resources. Implementing KM also makes it easier to innovate services(Goyal & Sharma, 2014). University libraries have a unique chance to help reimagine library services in the future.
Users of university libraries frequently have high expectations for the support services offered by the library. A type of collaboration that improves services, gives users more organizational learning abilities, and adds value is user feedback on library services. The goals of KM are to enhance library services, generate more with fewer resources, prevent duplication of effort, and take advantage of already existing knowledge(A. et al., 2015). In digital environments, the role of information and KM in library services has grown significantly. According to(Igbinovia & Ikenwe, 2017), KM practices are currently being carried out by non- governmental and private organizations in Bangladesh, particularly on social networks. However, in LIS, this technique is still in the theoretical stage. However, research on KM practices and the development of a strategic KM for developing countries in libraries is absent(Abah et al., 2022). Therefore, it is necessary to understand the value and significance of the KM from the viewpoint of a developing nation. Unlike developed countries, not much research has been published on Bangladesh’s perspective on KM practices and implementation in the library sector. It has also not been discovered what the users’ awareness and familiarity with KM are and how the service value of the libraries can be improved by implementing KM in public university libraries. In addition, most library users in Bangladesh are unaware of the potential impact of KM. As a result, they are not actively participating in making this a worthwhile endeavor. Therefore, it is necessary to discover the relevance and importance of KM for public university libraries in Bangladesh and identify the challenges of KM practices. These were the motivations that prompted this research.
Therefore, this research aims to identify the user's awareness of KM practices for public university libraries in Bangladesh. Due to the relative novelty of KM in Bangladesh's and other developing nations' LIS contexts, this research makes an important contribution(Igbinovia & Ikenwe, 2017). Predictable research findings will help higher authorities decide on effective KM strategies and policies to employ in university libraries. Additionally, the data collected from public university libraries may be applied to contribute to the various university libraries in Bangladesh, which would facilitate to success of this research. In this regard, this research is expected to add to the users understanding of KM in libraries. The present study also assists the authorities in determining the current practices of KM in their libraries. This research is also significant because it identifies various challenges of KM practices and recognizes the needs of KM in the university libraries in Bangladesh.
This research aims to recognize the user awareness of KM practices in public university libraries in Bangladesh. Based on this objective the following research questions guided this research.
RQ1: To what extent are users aware of KM practiced in public university libraries in Bangladesh?
RQ2: What are the challenges related to KM practice in public university libraries in
Bangladesh?
RQ3: To what extent are users' demographics associated with their characteristics, awareness, and KM familiarity issues?
For addressing RQ3, we have used non-parametric “Mann-Whitney” and “Kruskal- Wallis” tests to see the differences between variables.
Literature Review
(Batista & Quandt, 2017)in their study define “KM as the process of creating, sharing, using and managing the knowledge and information of an organization.” They found over a hundred definitions of knowledge management from various areas. They gathered these definitions from 23 disciplines and 13 different nations, reflecting the opinions of the authors on the definitions according to their fields and cultural backgrounds.(Mohajan, 2017).(Krejcie & Morgan, 1970), in his review paper, stated that there is no single definition for KM, and it is understood differently depending on the industry. For commercial organizations in the twenty- first century KM is a recognized, standardized organizational policy(Mostofa & Sultana, 2019). Experts in library and information science (LIS) will still be involved in KM. Nevertheless, KM needs to integrate and adjust to the shifting organizational environments to endure and prosper(Jain, 2014). KM in higher education could support the development of learned-centered knowledge and the shift from closed to open knowledge systems in action learning(Kakhki et al., 2021). To assist businesses, recover and use data to increase access to information sources, knowledge management (KM) can be defined as methods for gathering, communicating, coordinating, and locating knowledge sources(Dei, 2021). Value growth through the creation and provision of fresh, enhanced services is a component of service-based value(Girard & Girard & , 2015). To succeed in KM, organizations need
Abah, M., Asiedu, N. K., & Dei, DeGraft J. (2022). Knowledge management strategies in libraries: A systematic review. Library Philosophy and Practice. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/6779.
Abbas, K. D. (2015). Knowledge management strategies and practices in Nigerian agricultural research institutes (Doctoral dissertation, University of KwaZulu-Natal,Pietermaritzburg).Retrievedfromhttps://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10413/12995/Abbas_Kabiru_2015.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
Abualqumboz, M., Reid, I., Papalexi, M., & Bamford, D. (2017). Can knowledge be retained in informal organisational networks? In 18th European Conference on Knowledge Management (ECKM 2017). Academic Conferences and publishing limited.
Ahmad, K., JianMing, Z., & Rafi, M. (2019). Assessing the literature of knowledge management (KM) in the field of library and information science. Information Discovery and Delivery, 47(1), 35–41.
Akhavan, P., & Zahedi, M.R. (2014). Critical success factors in knowledge management among project-based organizations: A multi-case analysis. IUP Journal of Knowledge Management, 12(1), 20-38.
Akter, K. M., & Banik, S. (2019). Knowledge management practices of universities in Bangladesh: Lecturers' perception. Journal of Accounting Research, Organization and Economics, 2(1), 54-62.
Alosaimi, M. (2016). The role of knowledge management approaches for enhancing and supporting education (Doctoral dissertation, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne-Paris). Retrieved from https://www.theses.fr/2016PA01E064.
.
Alshehri, A., & Cumming, T. M. (2020). Mobile technologies and knowledge management in higher education institutions: Students' and educators' perspectives. World Journal of Education, 10(1).
Arrau, G. P. (2015). Knowledge management in the context of developing countries: The case of Chile. In European Conference on Knowledge Management.
Baghdadabad, A. H. (2008). The implications of knowledge management for library and information science education: A mixed-method investigation (Doctoral dissertation, RMIT University). Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/15621618.pdf.
Batista, F. F., & Quandt, C. (2017) Effectiveness of knowledge management implementation: An analysis of Brazilian Regulatory Agencies. 18th European Conference on Knowledge Management. ECKM 2017. Barcelona, Spain.
Dei, D.G. J. (2021). Perspectives of knowledge management systems implementation. Library Philosophy and Practice. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac
Dlamini, L. E. (2017). The role of librarians in knowledge management (KM): An exploratory study of academic libraries for public/state owned colleges in Swaziland. [Paper presentation]. IFLA 2017: Knowledge management satellite conference.
Girard, J., & Girard, J. (2015). Defining knowledge management: Toward an applied compendium. Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management, 3, 1-20.
Goyal, M., & Sharma, P. (2014). Reengineering library from semi-digital to digital library: A case study. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 2(8), 18-24.
Igbinovia, M. O., & Ikenwe, I. J. (2017). Knowledge management: Processes and systems. Information Impact: Journal of Information and Knowledge Management, 8(3), 26-38.
Islam M. A., Agarwal, N. K., & Ikeda, M. (2014). Library adoption of knowledge management using web 2.0: A new paradigm for libraries. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions, 40(4), 317–330.
Islam M. A., Agarwal, N. K., & Ikeda, M. (2015a). Conceptualizing value co-creation for service innovation in academic libraries. Business Information Review, 32(1), 45–52.
Islam M. A., Agarwal, N. K., & Ikeda, M. (2015b). Knowledge management for service innovation in academic libraries: A qualitative study. Library Management, 36(1/2), 40–57.
Islam, N., Islam, S., & Razzak, A. (2020). Problems of knowledge management practices in libraries and information centres of Bangladesh. International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions, 46(1), 34–51.
Islam, S., Siddike, A. K., Nowrin S., & Naznin, S. (2015). Usage and applications of knowledge management for improving library and information service in Bangladesh. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 14(3), 50-52.
Jain, P. (2014). A survey of knowledge management practice among academic staff at the University of Botswana. [Paper presentation] at 25th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACI), held in Auckland, New Zealand, 8-10 December.
Kakhki, K. M., Modiramani, P., Aminpour, F., Sadeghi-Gourji, S., & Ebrahimzadeh, E. (2021). The dance of knowledge management strategies in libraries: The case of the libraries of the Iranian universities of medical science. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 53(1), 181-202.
Koloniari, M., & Fassoulis, K. (2017). Knowledge management perceptions in academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 43(2), 135-142.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610.
Liebowitz, J., & Paliszkiewicz, J. (2019). The next generation of knowledge management: Implications for LIS educators and professionals. Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management, 7(2).
Maligat, D. E., Torio, J. O., Bigueras, R. T., Arispe, M. C., & Palaoag, T. D. (2019). Web-based knowledge management system for Camarines Norte State College. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 803. Retrieved from https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1757-899X/803/1/012006/meta.
Marouf, L. (2017). Are academic libraries ready for knowledge management? The Electronic Library, 35(1), 137-151. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-01-2016-0008.
Mohajan, H. K. (2017b). The roles of knowledge management for the development of organizations. Journal of Scientific Achievements, 2(2), 1-27.
Mostofa, S. M., & Islam, M. (2015). Challenges and opportunities of knowledge management in university library: A case study of Dhaka university library in Bangladesh. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 3(4), 49-61.
Mostofa, S. M., & Sultana, N. (2019). Present scenario of knowledge management effectuation in the national library of Bangladesh: A study. Journal of Multidisciplinary Science, 1(2),1-8.
Nazim, M., & Mukherjee, B. (2013). Librarians' perceptions of knowledge management in developing countries: A case with Indian academic libraries. International Information & Library Review, 45(1), 63-76.
Odor, H. (2018). Knowledge management. Journal of Business and Financial Affairs, 7(2). Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2167-0234.1000335.
Omotayo, F.O. (2015). Knowledge management as an important tool in organizational management: A review of literature. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1-23.
Pathak, R. K. (2014). Knowledge management in academic library: A need based approach. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(1), 17-23.
Roknuzzaman, M., Kanai, H., & Umemoto, K. (2009). Integration of knowledge management process into digital library system. Library Review, 58(5), 372–386.
Sallam, A. T., Eid, A. F., Elfaramawy, A. F., & Khodier, L. M. (2018). Applications of knowledge management in construction: A literature review. The Academic Research Community publication, 2(3), 11-18. Retrieved from https://dx.doi.org/10.21625/ archive.v2i3.342.
Shathi, S. J. (2019). Knowledge management practices in university libraries of Bangladesh. NU Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences & Business Studies, 5/6(2/1).
Shropshire, S., Semenza, J. L., & Koury, R. (2020). Knowledge management in practice in academic libraries. IFLA Journal, 46(1), 25-33.
Sultana, N., & Mostofa, S. M. (2018). Knowledge management initiative: A case study of the national library of Bangladesh. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice, 6(1), 6-17.
Suni, M. B. (2016). Knowledge management practices in academic library: A case study of Dar Al-Hikmah library (IIUM) (Doctoral dissertation, International Islamic University Malaysia). Retrieved from http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/jspui/handle/ 123456789/5450.
Tan, C. N. L. (2016). Enhancing knowledge sharing and research collaboration among academics: The role of knowledge management. Higher Education, 71, 525-556.
UGC (2019). 46th Annual Report 2019. Retrieved from http://ugc.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/ugc.portal.gov.bd/annual_reports/0b944cc5_aa77_44b7_b1db_cc1a20e0eb37/2021-09-08-06-49 e0bf991565e6 24555d9915 b54 629624d.pdf.
Verma, R., & Jayasimha, K.R. (2014). Service delivery innovation architecture: An empirical study of antecedents and outcomes. IIMB Management Review, 26, 105-121.
Wang, S., Noe, R. A., & Wang, Z.-M. (2014). Motivating knowledge sharing in knowledge management systems: A qualified experiment. Journal of Management, 40, 978-1009.
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Sk Mamun Mostofa, Roslina Othman

Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Record and Library Journal by Unair is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
3. The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC BY-SA).
4. The Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC BY-SA) license allows re-distribution and re-use of a licensed work on the conditions that the creator is appropriately credited and that any derivative work is made available under "the same, similar or a compatible license”. Other than the conditions mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.