Analysis of Student Information Literacy in State Islamic Religious Universities
Analisis Literasi Informasi Mahasiswa di Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Negeri
Unduhan
Background of the study: Students need to have good information literacy in order to complete their studies effectively and efficiently.
Purpose: to analyze the characteristics and information literacy of students at State Islamic Religious Universities (PTKIN).
Method: quantitative approach with survey methods. Data collection uses online questionnaire distribution. Data analysis techniques use descriptive statistics and inferential statistics.
Findings: PTKIN students accessed social media ≤ 6 hours every day (60.23%); classified as generation Z (digital natives) aged 10-25 years (98.86%); the number of gadgets owned is 1 (88.64%); the majority have WhatsApp (100%), Instagram (92.05%), YouTube (79.55%) and Twitter (53.41%); the most frequently accessed social media is WhatsApp (61.36%); the purpose of using social media is as a communication tool (83.36%), looking for information to support the thesis (80.68%), looking for entertainment/relaxation (70.45%), sharing information, opinions and/or knowledge (68.18%) , interacting socially (54.55%), interacting with friends (53.41%) and filling free time while waiting for something/free time (53.41%). The information literacy level of students at PTKIN is classified as moderate and tends to be high with an average score between 73 and 90 (73 ≤ X < 91). Factors that are positively related to information literacy are the availability of infrastructure, accessibility, independence and social support from lecturers and parents. Only the duration of internet access is negatively related to student information literacy at PTKIN.
Conclusion: Students at PTKIN already have sufficient information literacy to support the completion of their studies. However, information literacy needs to be improved in order to maximize study completion on time.
Unduhan
Amruddin., Priyanda, R., Agustina, T. S., Ariantini, N. S., Rusmayani, N. G. A. L., Aslindar, D. A., Ningsih, K. P., Wulandari, S., Putranto, P., Yuniati, I., Untari, I., Mujiani, S., & Wicaksono, D. (2022). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif. Pradina Pustaka.
Arifin, Z. (2020). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan. Jurnal Al-Hikmah, 1(1), 1-5.
Armstrong, C., Boden, D., Town, S., Woolley, M., Webber, S., & Abell, A. (2005). CILIP defines information literacy for the United Kingdom.
Asnawati, A. (2022). Literasi Informasi Membantu Meningkatkan Kemampuan Informasi dalam Proses Menyelesaikan Tugas Akhir Mahasiswa. Al-Ma Mun Jurnal Kajian Kepustakawanan Dan Informasi, 3(1), 1–14.
Barus, P. C., & Harahap, N. (2023). Analisis Literasi Informasi Reporter di Komunitas Pena Lingkar Toba Kelas Puisi. Jurnal Pustaka Ilmiah, 9(1), 11-20.
Damayanti, R. (2021). Strategi Pengembangan Perpustakaan Desa Pandan Baiduri dalam Meningkatkan Literasi Informasi Masyarakat. Nazharat: Jurnal Kebudayaan, 27(1), 20-32.
Dewi, S. M & Rochanah. (2017). Literasi Informasi Mahasiswa STIN Kudus dalam Memanfaatkan Digital Library. Libraria, 5(1), 185-198.
Dinata, K. B. (2021). Literasi Digital dalam Pembelajaran Daring. Eksponen, 11(1), 20–27.
Direktorat Jenderal Peningkatan Mutu Pendidik dan Tenaga Kependidikan. (2010). Literasi Informasi, Bahan Ajar Pelatihan Tenaga Perpustakaan Sekolah. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional.
Ganggi, R. I. P. (2018). Pengaruh Pemikiran Raymond C Davis tentang Bibliography Instruction terhadap Konsep Literasi Informasi. Anuva: Jurnal Kajian Budaya, Perpustakaan, dan Informasi, 2(1), 69-75.
Juwita, H. R & Hamidah, I. (2018). Evaluasi Kemampuan Literasi mahasiswa Universitas Kuningan. Semantik, 7(2), 80-89.
Kurniawan, H. (2009). SPSS Complete: Teknik Analisis Statistik Terlengkap dengan Software SPSS, Buku Seri Pertama. Jakarta: Salemba Infotek.
Norhabiba, F., & Putri, S. A. R. (2018). Hubungan Intensitas Akses Media Baru dan Kualitas Interaksi Lingkungan Sekitar Pada Mahasiswa Untag Surabaya. Interaksi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, 7(1), 8-15.
Nurohman, A. (2014). Signifikansi Literasi Informasi (Information Literacy) dalam Dunia Pendidikan di Era Global. Jurnal Kependidikan, 2(1), 1–25.
Pangestika, M. D. (2018). Pengaruh literasi informasi terhadap efektivitas belajar siswa. Pedagonal: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 2(2), 15-22.
Pattah, S. H. (2014). Literasi Informasi: Peningkatan Kompetensi Informasi dalam Pembelajaran. Khizanah Al-Hikmah, 2(2), 117-128.
Prasetyo, D., Rosyidi, F. R., Rohmadi, R., Auliyani, U., & Handayani, S. (2018). Keterampilan Literasi Informasi Mahasiswa Menurut Standar Kompetensi Literasi Informasi Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL). BACA: Jurnal Dokumentasi Dan Informasi, 39(1), 37.
Priadana, M. S & Sunarsi, D. (2021). Metode penelitian kuantitatif. Pascal Books.
Raharjo, D. P. (2021). Intensitas mengakses internet dengan perilaku phubbing. Psikoborneo Jurnal Imiah Psikologi, 9(1), 1-12.
Rahmawati, I. S. (2018). Menciptakan Generasi Literat Melalui Media Massa Surat. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 13(2), 59-68.
Raya, A. B., Kriska, M., Wastutiningsih, S. P., Cahyaningtyas, M. U., Djitmau, A., & Cahyani, G. F. (2018). Strategi Pemanfaatan Aplikasi Desa Apps dalam Literasi Informasi Pertanian. Jurnal Komunikasi Pembangunan, 16(2), 274-285.
Rizki, M., Arhami, M., & Huzeni, H. (2021). Perbaikan algoritma naive bayes classifier menggunakan teknik Laplacian Correction. Jurnal Teknologi, 21(1), 39-45.
Santoso, G., Hidayat, M. N. S., Murod, M., Susilahati, Solehudin, & Asbari, M. (2023). Transformasi Literasi Informasi Guru Menuju Kemandirian Belajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Transformatif, 2(1), 100–106.
Septiana, M & Wirangga, A. (2019). Perbandingan Literasi Informasi Mahasiswa Pemula Politeknik Negeri Batam. Journal of Digital Education, Communication and Arts, 2(1), 45-54.
Solihin, M. M. (2022). Analiss Literasi Informasi dan Motivasi Mahasiswa dalam Penyelesaian Studi di Masa Pandemi COVID-19. JURNAL IPTEKKOM (Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan & Teknologi Informasi), 24(2), 147-160.
Solihin, M. M. (2022). The Digital Literacy of Lecturers during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Pekommas, 7(2).
The Association of College and Researh Libraries. (2016). Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education. Chicago: The Association of College and Researh Libraries, a Division of the American Library Association.
Ulumi, B. (2019). Konsep dan Praktik Literasi Informasi untuk Mahasiswa: Kasus Mahasiswa Pekerja Paruh Waktu di UPT Perpustakaan UIN Walisongo. Pustakaloka: Jurnal Kajian Informasi dan Perpustakaan, 11(2), 1-19.
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2008). Toward Information Literacy Indicators. Paris: UNESCO Institut for Statistics.
Windah, A., Maryani, E., & Putra, P. (2022). Strategi Sosial Media, Kecakapan Literasi Informasi dan Literasi Digital Start-Up Siger Innovation Hub (@Sigerhub) sebagai Inkubator Bisnis Umkm di Provinsi Lampung. Info Bibliotheca: Jurnal Perpustakaan Dan Ilmu Informasi, 3(2), 104–122.
Yokhebed. (2018). Studi Literasi Informasi Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Tanjungpura. Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 15(1), 265-268.
Yusniah. (2016). Information Literacy of Library Science. JIPI: Jurnal Ilmu Perpustakaan dan Informasi, 1(1), 12-28.
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Muhtar Mochamad Solihin
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Record and Library Journal by Unair is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
3. The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC BY-SA).
4. The Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC BY-SA) license allows re-distribution and re-use of a licensed work on the conditions that the creator is appropriately credited and that any derivative work is made available under "the same, similar or a compatible license”. Other than the conditions mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.
