CO-PRODUCTION IN THE GOVERNANCE OF MARGOMULYO VILLAGE BASED ON LOCAL WISDOM (A CASE STUDY OF THE SAMIN COMMUNITY)
Downloads
The village government is expected to be able to have a significant influence on development in various fields. However, this interest often hinders village governance implementation due to the insufficient institutional capacity of the village. This situation can have far-reaching effects on socio-economic issues within the community. Therefore, institutional capacity and the development of c0-production for village governments and communities are key elements in addressing issues in the village. In the governance management process, Margomulyo village officials still require development in various aspects, including governance knowledge and adopting information technology in bureaucracy. This community service activity provides training and mentoring to Margomulyo village government officials to enhance their capacity. The method employed in this activity involves delivering lectures, providing modules, and offering follow-up mentoring. The outcomes of this community service include an improvement in the knowledge of village officials regarding capacity building and co-production, as evidenced by post-test scores, as well as the enhancement of the village website and the prototype of the Saminku application.
Batubara, A. H. (2006). Konsep Good Governance Dalam Konsep Otonomi Daerah. Analisis Administrasi Dan Kebijakan, 3, 1–6.
Bhargava, V. (2015) "Engaging Citizens and Civil Society to Promote Good Governance and Development Effectiveness,” ADB Governance Brief, 23(23), pp. 1–8. Available at: www.adb.org/.
Chambers, J. M., Wyborn, C., Ryan, M. E., Reid, R. S., Riechers, M., Serban, A., Bennett, N. J., Cvitanovic, C., Fernández-Giménez, M. E., Galvin, K. A., Goldstein, B. E., Klenk, N. L., Tengö, M., Brennan, R., Cockburn, J. J., Hill, R., Munera, C., Nel, J. L., Österblom, H., ... Pickering, T. (2021). Six modes of co-production for sustainability. Nature Sustainability, 4(11), 983–996. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00755-x
Chohan, S. K. (2020). New Public Management and its Impact on the Voluntary Sector : a case study of youth unemployment services in Coventry.
Farr, M. (2018). Power dynamics and collaborative mechanisms in co-production and co-design processes. Critical Social Policy, 38(4), 623–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018317747444
Fung, A. (2015). Putting the Public Back into Governance: The Challenges of Citizen Participation and Its Future. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12361
Heaton, J., Day, J., & Britten, N. (2016). Collaborative research and the co-production of knowledge for practice: An illustrative case study. Implementation Science, 11(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-016-0383-9
Kardos, M. (2012). The Reflection of Good Governance in Sustainable Development Strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 1166–1173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1098
Lewis A, King T, Herbert L, Repper J. (2017). Co-production – Sharing Our Experiences Reflecting on Our Learning. ImROC. Available at https://imroc.org/resources/13-co-productionsharing-experiences-reflecting-learning/. Accessed July 25, 2018
Loeffler, E., & Bovaird, T. (2021). User and Community Co-production of Public Value BT - The Palgrave Handbook of Co-Production of Public Services and Outcomes. In E. Loeffler & T. Bovaird (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Co-Production of Public Services and Outcomes (pp. 31–57). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53705-0_2
Marshall C, Zambeaux A, Ainley E, McNally D, King J, Wolfenden L, Lee H. (2019) NHS England Always Events® program: Developing a national model for co-production. Patient Experience Journal. 2019; 6(1):154-165. doi: 10.35680/2372-0247.1340.
Marzuki (2016) "Reformasi Birokrasi Dan Inovasi Pemberdayaan Masyarakat,” Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan Widya Praja, 42(2), p. 11. doi: 10.33701/jipwp.v42i2.146.
Oroh, G. S. (2014). Peranan Pemerintah Desa dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat di Bidang Pertanian di Desa Tumaratas Kecamatan Langowan Barat Kabupaten Minahasa. Politico: Jurnal Ilmu Politik, 1(5).
Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Strokosch, K. (2016). Co-Production and the Co-Creation of Value in Public Services: A suitable case for treatment? Public Management Review, 18(5), 639–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927
Ostrom, A. L., Parasuraman, A., Bowen, D. E., Patrício, L., & Voss, C. A. (2015). Service Research Priorities in a Rapidly Changing Context. Journal of Service Research, 18(2), 127–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670515576315
Pettican, A., Goodman, B., Bryant, W., Beresford, P., Freeman, P., Gladwell, V., Kilbride, C., & Speed, E. (2023). Doing together: reflections on facilitating the co-production of participatory action research with marginalised populations. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 15(2), 202–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2022.2146164
Rakhmat. 2018. Administrasi dan Akuntabilitas Publik. Yogyakarta: Andi
Saputro, R. H. and Safriansyah (2021) "Tantangan Sistem Informasi Berbasis Pelayanan Publik di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0,” Sawala : Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 9(1), pp. 89–101. doi: 10.30656/sawala.v9i1.2943
Setyadiharja, R., Kurniasih, D., Nursnaeny, P. S., & Nengsih, N. S. (2017). Good Governance vs Sound Governance: A Comparative Theoretical Analysis. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 163. https://doi.org/10.2991/icodag-17.2017.19
Turnhout, E., Metze, T., Wyborn, C., Klenk, N., & Louder, E. (2020). The politics of coproduction: participation, power, and transformation. Advancing the Science of Actionable Knowledge for Sustainability, 42, 15–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.11.009
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa
Van Eijk, C., & Steen, T. (2015). Why engage in co-production of public services? Mixing theory and empirical evidence. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(1), 28–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314566007
Verschuere, B., Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-production: The State of the Art in Research and the Future Agenda. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4), 1083–1101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9307-8
Copyright (c) 2024 Sulikah Asmorowati, Jusuf Irianto, Dian Yulie Reindrawati, Gabby Julia Prasistya, Feny Dwintania
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JLM by Unair is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
1. The journal allows the author to hold the copyright of the article without restrictions.
2. The journal allows the author(s) to retain publishing rights without restrictions
3. The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC BY-SA).
4. The Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike (CC BY-SA) license allows re-distribution and re-use of a licensed work on the conditions that the creator is appropriately credited and that any derivative work is made available under "the same, similar or a compatible license”. Other than the conditions mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation.
