Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2013): JURNAL ILMIAH PERIKANAN DAN KELAUTAN

Date Log

Submitted
January 20, 2019
Accepted
January 20, 2019
Published
April 1, 2013

1. Copyright of the article is transferred to the journal, by the knowledge of the author, whilst the moral right of the publication belongs to the author.

2. The legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Atribusi-Non Commercial-Share alike (CC BY-NC-SA),  (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/)

3. The articles published in the journal are open access and can be used for non-commercial purposes. Other than the aims mentioned above, the editorial board is not responsible for copyright violation

 

The manuscript authentic and copyright statement submission can be downloaded ON THIS FORM. 

Pengaruh Perbedaan Jenis Pakan Alami (Skeletonema sp., Chaetosceros sp., Tetraselmis sp.) terhadap Laju Pertumbuhan dan Kandungan Nutrisi pada Artemia sp.
[Effect Of Different Live Feed Type (Skeletonema sp., Chaetosceros sp., Tetraselmis sp.) To The Growth Rate and Nutritional Content On Artemia sp. ]

https://doi.org/10.20473/jipk.v5i1.11433
Rahayu Kusdarwati
Manajemen Kesehatan Ikan dan Budidaya Perikanan, Fakultas Perikanan dan Kelautan, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia.
Muhammad Yohan Firmansyah
Program Studi Akuakultur, Fakultas Perikanan dan Kelautan, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia.
Yudi Cahyoko
Manajemen Kesehatan Ikan dan Budidaya Perikanan, Fakultas Perikanan dan Kelautan, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia.

Corresponding Author(s) : Rahayu Kusdarwati

rahayu.k@fpk.unair.ac.id

Jurnal Ilmiah Perikanan dan Kelautan, Vol. 5 No. 1 (2013): JURNAL ILMIAH PERIKANAN DAN KELAUTAN

Abstract

Abstract
Artemia is an important live feed in the hatchery. Quality of Artemia can not be separated from the feed quality that given. The quality and quantity of feed in the waters constitute factors that determine the growth rate and nutrition contentent the Artemia. This study aims to determine effect of different live feed type to the growth rate and nutritional content on Artemia sp.. The research method used was experimental with Completely Randomized Design (CRD) using four treatments and five replications. The treatments used were: silage fish (A), Skeletonema sp. (B), Chaetoceros sp. (C) and Tetraselmis sp. (D). Analysis of data uses Anova. To know the difference among the treatments were done by Duncan Multiple range test. The results showed that difference of natural feed influence highly significant (p<0,05) on the rate of growth in absolute length and significant influence (p <0,05) on average daily growth weight of Artemia sp. Absolute length growth rate was highest in treatment D (3,92mm), then a row followed by treatment C (3,275mm), A (1,89mm) and B (1,775mm). The daily growth rate of weight was highest in treatment D (25,43%), then a row followed by treatment C (21,91%), B (19,24%) and A (18,77%). . Artemia that given live feed produces highest nutritional value of D (protein 44,96%; carbohydrate 18,47% and fat 26,91%) wasted Tetraselmis sp. and the lowest obtained by treatment A (protein 41,21%; carbohydrate 8,88% and fat 29,1%) wasted silage fish. Water quality during Artemia cultivation was temperature 28-320C, pH 7, dissolved oxygen 5-8 mg/L, salinity 31 ppt and ammonia 00,25 mg/L.

Keywords

Artemia sp.live feedgrowth and nutritional content
Kusdarwati, R., Firmansyah, M. Y., & Cahyoko, Y. (2013). Pengaruh Perbedaan Jenis Pakan Alami (Skeletonema sp., Chaetosceros sp., Tetraselmis sp.) terhadap Laju Pertumbuhan dan Kandungan Nutrisi pada Artemia sp. <br><i>[Effect Of Different Live Feed Type (Skeletonema sp., Chaetosceros sp., Tetraselmis sp.) To The Growth Rate and Nutritional Content On Artemia sp. ]<i>. Jurnal Ilmiah Perikanan Dan Kelautan, 5(1), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.20473/jipk.v5i1.11433
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Djarijah A. S. 1995. Pakan Alami. Kanisius. Yogyakarta. hal 44-71.
  2. Fahardian O., Yusoff F. M. and S. Mohamed. 2009. Nutritional values of Apocyclops dengizicus (Copepoda: Cyclopoida) fed Chaetocerous calcitrans and Tetraselmis tetrathele. www. onlinelibrary.wiley.com. 08/01/2012.
  3. Gusrina. 2008. Budidaya Ikan Jilid 2. Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta. hal 185-230.
  4. Harefa F. 2003. Pembudidayaan Artemia untuk Pakan Udang dan Ikan. Penebar Swadaya. Jakarta. hal 14-25.
  5. Hastuti W. 1989. Teknik Penyediaan Makanan Alami untuk Pembenihan Udang Skala Rumah Tangga. Departemen Pertanian. Direktorat Jendral Perikanan Balai Budidaya Air Payau Jepara. Jepara. hal 7-14.
  6. Herawati V. E. 2005. Manajemen Pemberian Pakan Ikan. Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang. hal. 3-4.
  7. Isnansetyo A. dan Kurniastusti. 1995. Teknik Kultur Phytoplankton dan Zooplankton:Pakan Alami untuk Organisme Laut. Kanisius. Yogyakarta. hal 36-52.
  8. Jauncey K. and B. Ross. 1982. A guide to tilapia feeds and feeding. Institude of Aquaculture. University of Stirling. Scotland.
  9. Jusadi D. 2003. Budidaya Pakan Alami. Direktorat Pendidikan. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta. hal 12-16.
  10. Kusriningrum. 2008. Perancangan Percobaan. Airlangga University Press. Surabaya.
  11. Mudjiman, A. 1989. Udang Renik Air Asin (Artemia Salina). PT Bharata. Jakarta.
  12. Mukti, A. T., M. Arief dan W. Hastuti. 2003. Dasar-dasar Akuakultur. Program Studi Budiaya Perairan. Fakultas Kedokteran Hewan. Universitas Airlangga. Surabaya. hal 42-44.
  13. Murtidjo, B. A. 2001. Pedoman Meramu Pakan Ikan. Kanisius. Yogyakarta. 128 hal.
  14. Saputra S. W. 2007. Dinamika Populasi. Program Studi Manajemen Sumberdaya Peraian Fakultas Perikanan dan Ilmu Kelautan Universitas Diponegoro. Semarang. hal 11.
  15. Sorgelos P. 1985. Potential of Converting Microalgae Into Brine Shrimp Artemia. www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications. 25/12/2011. 3 hal.
  16. Srihartini. 1992. Budidaya Ikan. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Fisika Terapan LIPI. Subang. 9 hal.
  17. Suhartono, Adiwijaya D. dan T. Suprapto. 2008. Penggunaan Silase Ikan dalam Produksi Kista Artemia di Tambak Garam. www.isjd.pdii.lipi.go.id/. 24/12/2011. 12 hal.
  18. Supriantini E., Widowati I. dan Ambariyanto. 2007b. Kandungan Asam Lemak Omega-3 (Asam Linoleat) pada Kerang Totok Polymesoda erosa yang diberi Pakan Tetraselmis chuii dan Skeletonema costatum. www.isjd.pdii .lipi.go.id. 06/01/2012. 7 hal.
  19. Sutomo, Komala R., Wahyuni E.T. dan M. G. L. Pangabean. 2007. Pengaruh Jenis Pakan Mikroalgae Yang Berbeda Terhadap Pertumbuhan Populasi Rotifer. www.isjd.pdii.lipi.go.id/admin /jurnal/. 26/12/2011. 16 hal.
  20. Treece G. D. 2000. Artemia Production for Marine Larval Fish Culture. Southern Regional Aquaculture Center through Grant No. 97-38500-4124 from the United States Department of Agriculture, Cooperative States Research, Education, and Extension Service. Texas. hal 2-3.
  21. Vos J. and N. L. Rosa. 1980. Manual On Artemia Production In Salt Ponds In The Philippines. www.fao.org/. 12/12/2011. 3 hal.
  22. Widiarti B. D. 1986. Pengaruh Pemberian Bekatul, Tepung Kedelai dan Campuran Kudeuanya sebagai Makanan Terhadap Produksi Artemia salina Leach. Institut Pertanian Bogor. Bogor. hal 47.
Read More
Author biographies is not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF
Altmetric Badge
Trend MD
Statistic
Read Counter : 2482 Download : 11477

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 > >>